Cargando…

The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Objective. To examine the effects of clinical hypnosis versus NLP intervention on the success rate of ECV procedures in comparison to a control group. Methods. A prospective off-centre randomised trial of a clinical hypnosis intervention against NLP of women with a singleton breech fetus at or after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinhard, Joscha, Peiffer, Swati, Sänger, Nicole, Herrmann, Eva, Yuan, Juping, Louwen, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/626740
_version_ 1782237199296626688
author Reinhard, Joscha
Peiffer, Swati
Sänger, Nicole
Herrmann, Eva
Yuan, Juping
Louwen, Frank
author_facet Reinhard, Joscha
Peiffer, Swati
Sänger, Nicole
Herrmann, Eva
Yuan, Juping
Louwen, Frank
author_sort Reinhard, Joscha
collection PubMed
description Objective. To examine the effects of clinical hypnosis versus NLP intervention on the success rate of ECV procedures in comparison to a control group. Methods. A prospective off-centre randomised trial of a clinical hypnosis intervention against NLP of women with a singleton breech fetus at or after 37(0/7) (259 days) weeks of gestation and normal amniotic fluid index. All 80 participants heard a 20-minute recorded intervention via head phones. Main outcome assessed was success rate of ECV. The intervention groups were compared with a control group with standard medical care alone (n = 122). Results. A total of 42 women, who received a hypnosis intervention prior to ECV, had a 40.5% (n = 17), successful ECV, whereas 38 women, who received NLP, had a 44.7% (n = 17) successful ECV (P > 0.05). The control group had similar patient characteristics compared to the intervention groups (P > 0.05). In the control group (n = 122) 27.3% (n = 33) had a statistically significant lower successful ECV procedure than NLP (P = 0.05) and hypnosis and NLP (P = 0.03). Conclusions. These findings suggest that prior clinical hypnosis and NLP have similar success rates of ECV procedures and are both superior to standard medical care alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3388481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33884812012-07-09 The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Reinhard, Joscha Peiffer, Swati Sänger, Nicole Herrmann, Eva Yuan, Juping Louwen, Frank Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Objective. To examine the effects of clinical hypnosis versus NLP intervention on the success rate of ECV procedures in comparison to a control group. Methods. A prospective off-centre randomised trial of a clinical hypnosis intervention against NLP of women with a singleton breech fetus at or after 37(0/7) (259 days) weeks of gestation and normal amniotic fluid index. All 80 participants heard a 20-minute recorded intervention via head phones. Main outcome assessed was success rate of ECV. The intervention groups were compared with a control group with standard medical care alone (n = 122). Results. A total of 42 women, who received a hypnosis intervention prior to ECV, had a 40.5% (n = 17), successful ECV, whereas 38 women, who received NLP, had a 44.7% (n = 17) successful ECV (P > 0.05). The control group had similar patient characteristics compared to the intervention groups (P > 0.05). In the control group (n = 122) 27.3% (n = 33) had a statistically significant lower successful ECV procedure than NLP (P = 0.05) and hypnosis and NLP (P = 0.03). Conclusions. These findings suggest that prior clinical hypnosis and NLP have similar success rates of ECV procedures and are both superior to standard medical care alone. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3388481/ /pubmed/22778774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/626740 Text en Copyright © 2012 Joscha Reinhard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reinhard, Joscha
Peiffer, Swati
Sänger, Nicole
Herrmann, Eva
Yuan, Juping
Louwen, Frank
The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_full The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_short The Effects of Clinical Hypnosis versus Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) before External Cephalic Version (ECV): A Prospective Off-Centre Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of clinical hypnosis versus neurolinguistic programming (nlp) before external cephalic version (ecv): a prospective off-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3388481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/626740
work_keys_str_mv AT reinhardjoscha theeffectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT peifferswati theeffectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT sangernicole theeffectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT herrmanneva theeffectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT yuanjuping theeffectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT louwenfrank theeffectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT reinhardjoscha effectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT peifferswati effectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT sangernicole effectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT herrmanneva effectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT yuanjuping effectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
AT louwenfrank effectsofclinicalhypnosisversusneurolinguisticprogrammingnlpbeforeexternalcephalicversionecvaprospectiveoffcentrerandomiseddoubleblindcontrolledtrial