Cargando…

Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines

In this work, a chromatographic method for identification of volatile organic compounds was compared with canine recognition. Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC–TOF MS) were used for determination of concentrations of trace gases present in human breath. The technique enables rapid determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buszewski, Bogusław, Ligor, Tomasz, Jezierski, Tadeusz, Wenda-Piesik, Anna, Walczak, Marta, Rudnicka, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22660158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6102-8
_version_ 1782237286464749568
author Buszewski, Bogusław
Ligor, Tomasz
Jezierski, Tadeusz
Wenda-Piesik, Anna
Walczak, Marta
Rudnicka, Joanna
author_facet Buszewski, Bogusław
Ligor, Tomasz
Jezierski, Tadeusz
Wenda-Piesik, Anna
Walczak, Marta
Rudnicka, Joanna
author_sort Buszewski, Bogusław
collection PubMed
description In this work, a chromatographic method for identification of volatile organic compounds was compared with canine recognition. Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC–TOF MS) were used for determination of concentrations of trace gases present in human breath. The technique enables rapid determination of compounds in human breath, at the parts per billion level. Linear correlations were from 0.83–234.05 ppb, the limit of detection was the range 0.31–0.75 ppb, and precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was less than 10.00 %. Moreover, trained dogs are able to discriminate breath samples of patients with diagnosed cancer. We found a positive correlation between dog indications and the ethyl acetate and 2-pentanone content of breath (r = 0.85 and r = 0.97, respectively). The methods presented for detection of lung cancer markers in exhaled air could be used as a potential non-invasive tool for screening. In addition, the canine method is relatively simple and inexpensive in comparison with chromatography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3389235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33892352012-07-11 Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines Buszewski, Bogusław Ligor, Tomasz Jezierski, Tadeusz Wenda-Piesik, Anna Walczak, Marta Rudnicka, Joanna Anal Bioanal Chem Original Paper In this work, a chromatographic method for identification of volatile organic compounds was compared with canine recognition. Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC–TOF MS) were used for determination of concentrations of trace gases present in human breath. The technique enables rapid determination of compounds in human breath, at the parts per billion level. Linear correlations were from 0.83–234.05 ppb, the limit of detection was the range 0.31–0.75 ppb, and precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was less than 10.00 %. Moreover, trained dogs are able to discriminate breath samples of patients with diagnosed cancer. We found a positive correlation between dog indications and the ethyl acetate and 2-pentanone content of breath (r = 0.85 and r = 0.97, respectively). The methods presented for detection of lung cancer markers in exhaled air could be used as a potential non-invasive tool for screening. In addition, the canine method is relatively simple and inexpensive in comparison with chromatography. Springer-Verlag 2012-06-03 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3389235/ /pubmed/22660158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6102-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Buszewski, Bogusław
Ligor, Tomasz
Jezierski, Tadeusz
Wenda-Piesik, Anna
Walczak, Marta
Rudnicka, Joanna
Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
title Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
title_full Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
title_fullStr Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
title_full_unstemmed Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
title_short Identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
title_sort identification of volatile lung cancer markers by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: comparison with discrimination by canines
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22660158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6102-8
work_keys_str_mv AT buszewskibogusław identificationofvolatilelungcancermarkersbygaschromatographymassspectrometrycomparisonwithdiscriminationbycanines
AT ligortomasz identificationofvolatilelungcancermarkersbygaschromatographymassspectrometrycomparisonwithdiscriminationbycanines
AT jezierskitadeusz identificationofvolatilelungcancermarkersbygaschromatographymassspectrometrycomparisonwithdiscriminationbycanines
AT wendapiesikanna identificationofvolatilelungcancermarkersbygaschromatographymassspectrometrycomparisonwithdiscriminationbycanines
AT walczakmarta identificationofvolatilelungcancermarkersbygaschromatographymassspectrometrycomparisonwithdiscriminationbycanines
AT rudnickajoanna identificationofvolatilelungcancermarkersbygaschromatographymassspectrometrycomparisonwithdiscriminationbycanines