Cargando…
Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy
BACKGROUND: We have developed an intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency (Disc PRF) technique, using Diskit II® needles (NeuroTherm, Wilmington, MA, USA), as a minimally invasive treatment option for chronic discogenic low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the representative outcom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Pain Society
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2012.25.3.155 |
_version_ | 1782237292066242560 |
---|---|
author | Fukui, Sei Nitta, Kazuhito Iwashita, Narihito Tomie, Hisashi Nosaka, Shuichi Rohof, Olav |
author_facet | Fukui, Sei Nitta, Kazuhito Iwashita, Narihito Tomie, Hisashi Nosaka, Shuichi Rohof, Olav |
author_sort | Fukui, Sei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We have developed an intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency (Disc PRF) technique, using Diskit II® needles (NeuroTherm, Wilmington, MA, USA), as a minimally invasive treatment option for chronic discogenic low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the representative outcomes of Disc PRF and Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET) in terms of pain relief and reduction of disability. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with chronic discogenic LBP who underwent either Disc PRF (n = 15) or IDET (n = 16) were enrolled in the study. A Diskit II® needle (15-cm length, 20-gauge needle with a 20-mm active tip) was placed centrally in the disc. PRF was applied for 15 min at a setting of 5 × 50 ms/s and 60 V. The pain intensity score on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were assessed pretreatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. RESULTS: The mean NRS was significantly improved from 7.2 ± 0.6 pretreatment to 2.5 ± 0.9 in the Disc PRF group, and from 7.5 ± 1.0 to 1.7 ± 1.5 in the IDET group, at the 6-month follow-up. The mean RMDQ also showed significant improvement in both the Disc PRF group and the IDET group at the 6-month follow-up. There were no significant differences in the pretreatment NRS and RMDQ scores between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Disc PRF appears to be an alternative to IDET as a safe, minimally invasive treatment option for patients with chronic discogenic LBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3389319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Pain Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33893192012-07-11 Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy Fukui, Sei Nitta, Kazuhito Iwashita, Narihito Tomie, Hisashi Nosaka, Shuichi Rohof, Olav Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: We have developed an intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency (Disc PRF) technique, using Diskit II® needles (NeuroTherm, Wilmington, MA, USA), as a minimally invasive treatment option for chronic discogenic low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the representative outcomes of Disc PRF and Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET) in terms of pain relief and reduction of disability. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with chronic discogenic LBP who underwent either Disc PRF (n = 15) or IDET (n = 16) were enrolled in the study. A Diskit II® needle (15-cm length, 20-gauge needle with a 20-mm active tip) was placed centrally in the disc. PRF was applied for 15 min at a setting of 5 × 50 ms/s and 60 V. The pain intensity score on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were assessed pretreatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. RESULTS: The mean NRS was significantly improved from 7.2 ± 0.6 pretreatment to 2.5 ± 0.9 in the Disc PRF group, and from 7.5 ± 1.0 to 1.7 ± 1.5 in the IDET group, at the 6-month follow-up. The mean RMDQ also showed significant improvement in both the Disc PRF group and the IDET group at the 6-month follow-up. There were no significant differences in the pretreatment NRS and RMDQ scores between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Disc PRF appears to be an alternative to IDET as a safe, minimally invasive treatment option for patients with chronic discogenic LBP. The Korean Pain Society 2012-07 2012-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3389319/ /pubmed/22787545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2012.25.3.155 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2012 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fukui, Sei Nitta, Kazuhito Iwashita, Narihito Tomie, Hisashi Nosaka, Shuichi Rohof, Olav Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy |
title | Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy |
title_full | Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy |
title_fullStr | Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy |
title_short | Results of Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Comparison with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy |
title_sort | results of intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency for lumbar discogenic pain: comparison with intradiscal electrothermal therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2012.25.3.155 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fukuisei resultsofintradiscalpulsedradiofrequencyforlumbardiscogenicpaincomparisonwithintradiscalelectrothermaltherapy AT nittakazuhito resultsofintradiscalpulsedradiofrequencyforlumbardiscogenicpaincomparisonwithintradiscalelectrothermaltherapy AT iwashitanarihito resultsofintradiscalpulsedradiofrequencyforlumbardiscogenicpaincomparisonwithintradiscalelectrothermaltherapy AT tomiehisashi resultsofintradiscalpulsedradiofrequencyforlumbardiscogenicpaincomparisonwithintradiscalelectrothermaltherapy AT nosakashuichi resultsofintradiscalpulsedradiofrequencyforlumbardiscogenicpaincomparisonwithintradiscalelectrothermaltherapy AT rohofolav resultsofintradiscalpulsedradiofrequencyforlumbardiscogenicpaincomparisonwithintradiscalelectrothermaltherapy |