Cargando…

Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling has led to a subclassification of breast cancers independent of established clinical parameters, such as the Sorlie–Perou subtypes. Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, but it is unknown if MD is associated with molec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksson, L, Hall, P, Czene, K, dos Santos Silva, I, McCormack, V, Bergh, J, Bjohle, J, Ploner, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.234
_version_ 1782237310102798336
author Eriksson, L
Hall, P
Czene, K
dos Santos Silva, I
McCormack, V
Bergh, J
Bjohle, J
Ploner, A
author_facet Eriksson, L
Hall, P
Czene, K
dos Santos Silva, I
McCormack, V
Bergh, J
Bjohle, J
Ploner, A
author_sort Eriksson, L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling has led to a subclassification of breast cancers independent of established clinical parameters, such as the Sorlie–Perou subtypes. Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, but it is unknown if MD is associated with molecular subtypes of this carcinoma. METHODS: We investigated whether MD was associated with breast cancer subtypes in 110 women with breast cancer, operated in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1994 to 1996. Subtypes were defined using expression data from HGU133A+B chips. The MD of the unaffected breast was measured using the Cumulus software. We used multinomial logistic models to investigate the relationship between MD and Sorlie–Perou subtypes. RESULTS: Although the distribution of molecular subtypes differed in women with high vs low MD, this was statistically non-significant (P=0.249), and further analyses revealed no association between the MD and Sorlie–Perou subtypes as a whole, nor with individual subtypes. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that although MD is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, it does not seem to be differentially associated with breast cancer molecular subtypes. However, larger studies with more comprehensive covariate information are needed to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3389424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33894242013-06-26 Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer Eriksson, L Hall, P Czene, K dos Santos Silva, I McCormack, V Bergh, J Bjohle, J Ploner, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling has led to a subclassification of breast cancers independent of established clinical parameters, such as the Sorlie–Perou subtypes. Mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, but it is unknown if MD is associated with molecular subtypes of this carcinoma. METHODS: We investigated whether MD was associated with breast cancer subtypes in 110 women with breast cancer, operated in Stockholm, Sweden, during 1994 to 1996. Subtypes were defined using expression data from HGU133A+B chips. The MD of the unaffected breast was measured using the Cumulus software. We used multinomial logistic models to investigate the relationship between MD and Sorlie–Perou subtypes. RESULTS: Although the distribution of molecular subtypes differed in women with high vs low MD, this was statistically non-significant (P=0.249), and further analyses revealed no association between the MD and Sorlie–Perou subtypes as a whole, nor with individual subtypes. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that although MD is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer, it does not seem to be differentially associated with breast cancer molecular subtypes. However, larger studies with more comprehensive covariate information are needed to confirm these results. Nature Publishing Group 2012-06-26 2012-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3389424/ /pubmed/22644308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.234 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Eriksson, L
Hall, P
Czene, K
dos Santos Silva, I
McCormack, V
Bergh, J
Bjohle, J
Ploner, A
Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
title Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
title_full Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
title_fullStr Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
title_short Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
title_sort mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.234
work_keys_str_mv AT erikssonl mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT hallp mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT czenek mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT dossantossilvai mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT mccormackv mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT berghj mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT bjohlej mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer
AT plonera mammographicdensityandmolecularsubtypesofbreastcancer