Cargando…
Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation
The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to all demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today’s highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science. They need to be advanced and complemented by interactive and transparent forms of review, pub...
Autor principal: | Pöschl, Ulrich |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00033 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
por: Wicherts, Jelte M.
Publicado: (2016) -
Transparent peer review and open data at Communications Biology
Publicado: (2019) -
Trialing transparent peer review
por: Cosgrove, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The Necessities for the Transparent Peer-Review
por: Lee, Jung Hun, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Transparent peer review for all
Publicado: (2022)