Cargando…

Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics

In the recent years, we have been witnessing a very dynamic development of diagnostic methods of imaging. In contemporary radiology, the carrier of the diagnostic information is the image, obtained as a result of an X-ray beam transmitted through the patient’s body, with modulation of intensity, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oborska-Kumaszyńska, Dominika, Wiśniewska-Kubka, Sylwia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802780
_version_ 1782237364738850816
author Oborska-Kumaszyńska, Dominika
Wiśniewska-Kubka, Sylwia
author_facet Oborska-Kumaszyńska, Dominika
Wiśniewska-Kubka, Sylwia
author_sort Oborska-Kumaszyńska, Dominika
collection PubMed
description In the recent years, we have been witnessing a very dynamic development of diagnostic methods of imaging. In contemporary radiology, the carrier of the diagnostic information is the image, obtained as a result of an X-ray beam transmitted through the patient’s body, with modulation of intensity, and processing of data collected by the detector. Depending on the diagnostic method used, signals can be detected with analog (x-ray film) or digital systems (CR, DR and DDR). Each of these methods of image acquisition, due to its own technological solutions, determines a different quality of imaging (diagnostic data). The introduction of digital image receptors, instead of conventional SF systems, increased the patient dose, as a result of a gradually increasing exposure. This followed from the fact that in digital systems, the increased radiation dose reduces image noise and improves image quality, and that is owing to the data capacity of these systems (impossible in SF systems with a limited data capacity of the image detector). The availability of the multitude of imaging systems, each characterized by disparate qualitative and quantitative parameters, implies the problem of evaluation and enforcement of a proper efficiency from manufacturers of these systems. At the same time, there is a legal problem present in our country, i.e. the lack of laws and regulations regarding standards of the scope of quality control (parameters) and measurement methodology for the systems of digital image acquisition. In the European countries, the scope and standards of control are regulated by the manufacturers and European Guidelines, whereas in the United States, AAPM Reports have been introduced, that specifically describe methods of tests performance, their frequency, as well as target values and limits. This paper is a review of both, the scope of quality control parameters of image detectors in analog and digital systems of imaging, and the measurement methodology. The parameters determining the image quality are as follows: detection efficiency, dynamic range, spatial sampling, contrast resolution, spatial resolution, noise, and quantitative detection efficiency. Validation of the measurement methods, establishing standards of radiographic techniques for the performed examinations, and creating a uniform system of supervision, appears to be the only way to ensure an effective control of imaging systems and to eliminate an increasing exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3389874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33898742012-07-16 Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics Oborska-Kumaszyńska, Dominika Wiśniewska-Kubka, Sylwia Pol J Radiol Review Article In the recent years, we have been witnessing a very dynamic development of diagnostic methods of imaging. In contemporary radiology, the carrier of the diagnostic information is the image, obtained as a result of an X-ray beam transmitted through the patient’s body, with modulation of intensity, and processing of data collected by the detector. Depending on the diagnostic method used, signals can be detected with analog (x-ray film) or digital systems (CR, DR and DDR). Each of these methods of image acquisition, due to its own technological solutions, determines a different quality of imaging (diagnostic data). The introduction of digital image receptors, instead of conventional SF systems, increased the patient dose, as a result of a gradually increasing exposure. This followed from the fact that in digital systems, the increased radiation dose reduces image noise and improves image quality, and that is owing to the data capacity of these systems (impossible in SF systems with a limited data capacity of the image detector). The availability of the multitude of imaging systems, each characterized by disparate qualitative and quantitative parameters, implies the problem of evaluation and enforcement of a proper efficiency from manufacturers of these systems. At the same time, there is a legal problem present in our country, i.e. the lack of laws and regulations regarding standards of the scope of quality control (parameters) and measurement methodology for the systems of digital image acquisition. In the European countries, the scope and standards of control are regulated by the manufacturers and European Guidelines, whereas in the United States, AAPM Reports have been introduced, that specifically describe methods of tests performance, their frequency, as well as target values and limits. This paper is a review of both, the scope of quality control parameters of image detectors in analog and digital systems of imaging, and the measurement methodology. The parameters determining the image quality are as follows: detection efficiency, dynamic range, spatial sampling, contrast resolution, spatial resolution, noise, and quantitative detection efficiency. Validation of the measurement methods, establishing standards of radiographic techniques for the performed examinations, and creating a uniform system of supervision, appears to be the only way to ensure an effective control of imaging systems and to eliminate an increasing exposure. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3389874/ /pubmed/22802780 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2010 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Oborska-Kumaszyńska, Dominika
Wiśniewska-Kubka, Sylwia
Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
title Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
title_full Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
title_fullStr Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
title_short Analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
title_sort analog and digital systems of imaging in roentgenodiagnostics
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3389874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802780
work_keys_str_mv AT oborskakumaszynskadominika analoganddigitalsystemsofimaginginroentgenodiagnostics
AT wisniewskakubkasylwia analoganddigitalsystemsofimaginginroentgenodiagnostics