Cargando…
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the commonest cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Elderly patients have higher risk of VTE because of the high prevalence of predisposing co-morbidities and acute illnesses. Clinical diagnosis of VTE in the elderly patient is particularly difficult an...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Science Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.00114 |
_version_ | 1782237395228295168 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Kwok M Litton, Edward |
author_facet | Ho, Kwok M Litton, Edward |
author_sort | Ho, Kwok M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the commonest cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Elderly patients have higher risk of VTE because of the high prevalence of predisposing co-morbidities and acute illnesses. Clinical diagnosis of VTE in the elderly patient is particularly difficult and, as such, adequate VTE prophylaxis is of pivotal importance in reducing the mortality and morbidities of VTE. Omission of VTE prophylaxis is, however, very common despite continuous education. A simple way to overcome this problem is to implement universal VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized elderly patients instead of selective prophylaxis for some patients only according to individual's risk of VTE. Although pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is effective for most patients, a high prevalence of renal impairment and drug interactions in the hospitalized elderly patients suggests that a multimodality approach may be more appropriate. Mechanical VTE prophylaxis, including calf and thigh compression devices and/or an inferior vena cava filter, are often underutilized in hospitalized elderly patients who are at high-risk of bleeding and VTE. Because pneumatic compression devices and thigh length stockings are virtually risk free, mechanical VTE prophylaxis may allow early or immediate implementation of VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized elderly patients, regardless of their bleeding and VTE risk. Although the cost-effectiveness of this Multimodality Universal STat (‘MUST’) VTE prophylaxis approach for hospitalized elderly patients remains uncertain, this strategy appears to offer some advantages over the traditional ‘selective and single-modal’ VTE prophylaxis approach, which often becomes ‘hit or miss’ or not implemented promptly in many hospitalized elderly patients. A large clustered randomized controlled trial is, however, needed to assess whether early, multimodality, universal VTE prophylaxis can improve important clinical outcomes of hospitalized elderly patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3390075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Science Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33900752012-07-10 Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy Ho, Kwok M Litton, Edward J Geriatr Cardiol Review Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the commonest cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients. Elderly patients have higher risk of VTE because of the high prevalence of predisposing co-morbidities and acute illnesses. Clinical diagnosis of VTE in the elderly patient is particularly difficult and, as such, adequate VTE prophylaxis is of pivotal importance in reducing the mortality and morbidities of VTE. Omission of VTE prophylaxis is, however, very common despite continuous education. A simple way to overcome this problem is to implement universal VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized elderly patients instead of selective prophylaxis for some patients only according to individual's risk of VTE. Although pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is effective for most patients, a high prevalence of renal impairment and drug interactions in the hospitalized elderly patients suggests that a multimodality approach may be more appropriate. Mechanical VTE prophylaxis, including calf and thigh compression devices and/or an inferior vena cava filter, are often underutilized in hospitalized elderly patients who are at high-risk of bleeding and VTE. Because pneumatic compression devices and thigh length stockings are virtually risk free, mechanical VTE prophylaxis may allow early or immediate implementation of VTE prophylaxis for all hospitalized elderly patients, regardless of their bleeding and VTE risk. Although the cost-effectiveness of this Multimodality Universal STat (‘MUST’) VTE prophylaxis approach for hospitalized elderly patients remains uncertain, this strategy appears to offer some advantages over the traditional ‘selective and single-modal’ VTE prophylaxis approach, which often becomes ‘hit or miss’ or not implemented promptly in many hospitalized elderly patients. A large clustered randomized controlled trial is, however, needed to assess whether early, multimodality, universal VTE prophylaxis can improve important clinical outcomes of hospitalized elderly patients. Science Press 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3390075/ /pubmed/22783295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.00114 Text en Institute of Geriatric Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission. |
spellingShingle | Review Ho, Kwok M Litton, Edward Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy |
title | Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy |
title_full | Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy |
title_fullStr | Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy |
title_full_unstemmed | Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy |
title_short | Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: Time to consider a ‘MUST’ strategy |
title_sort | venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized elderly patients: time to consider a ‘must’ strategy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.00114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hokwokm venousthromboembolismprophylaxisinhospitalizedelderlypatientstimetoconsideramuststrategy AT littonedward venousthromboembolismprophylaxisinhospitalizedelderlypatientstimetoconsideramuststrategy |