Cargando…
Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is most commonly measured via the bladder with the patient in the supine position. In the ICU, patients are nursed with the head of the bed elevated at 30° (HOB30) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study investigated whether gastri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S11 |
_version_ | 1782237422164115456 |
---|---|
author | Rooban, Nirooshan Regli, Adrian Davis, Wendy A De Keulenaer, Bart L |
author_facet | Rooban, Nirooshan Regli, Adrian Davis, Wendy A De Keulenaer, Bart L |
author_sort | Rooban, Nirooshan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is most commonly measured via the bladder with the patient in the supine position. In the ICU, patients are nursed with the head of the bed elevated at 30° (HOB30) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study investigated whether gastric pressure at HOB30 can be used as a surrogate measure of IAP via the bladder in the supine position. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a single-centre intensive care unit. A total of 20 patients were included. IAP was recorded simultaneously via the bladder catheter (bladder pressure, IBP) and via nasogastric tube (gastric pressures, IGP) in the supine and HOB30 position. Each patient had three sets of IAP measurements performed at least 4 h apart. RESULTS: In the supine position, mean IBP was 12.3 ± 4.5 mmHg compared to IGP of 11.8 ± 4.7 mmHg. The bias between the two groups was 0.5 and precision of 3.7 (LA, -6.8 to 7.5 mmHg). At 30 degrees, mean IBP was 15.8 ± 4.9 mmHg compared to IGP of 13.1 ± 6.1 mmHg. The bias between both groups was 2.7 with a precision of 5.5 (LA, -8.0 to 13.5). Comparing IBP in the supine position with IGP at 30° showed a bias of -0.8 and precision of 5.6 (LA, -10.1 to 11.6 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IAP measured via a nasogastric tube was less influenced by changing the body position from supine to HOB30 than was bladder pressure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3390294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33902942012-07-06 Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study Rooban, Nirooshan Regli, Adrian Davis, Wendy A De Keulenaer, Bart L Ann Intensive Care Research OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is most commonly measured via the bladder with the patient in the supine position. In the ICU, patients are nursed with the head of the bed elevated at 30° (HOB30) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study investigated whether gastric pressure at HOB30 can be used as a surrogate measure of IAP via the bladder in the supine position. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a single-centre intensive care unit. A total of 20 patients were included. IAP was recorded simultaneously via the bladder catheter (bladder pressure, IBP) and via nasogastric tube (gastric pressures, IGP) in the supine and HOB30 position. Each patient had three sets of IAP measurements performed at least 4 h apart. RESULTS: In the supine position, mean IBP was 12.3 ± 4.5 mmHg compared to IGP of 11.8 ± 4.7 mmHg. The bias between the two groups was 0.5 and precision of 3.7 (LA, -6.8 to 7.5 mmHg). At 30 degrees, mean IBP was 15.8 ± 4.9 mmHg compared to IGP of 13.1 ± 6.1 mmHg. The bias between both groups was 2.7 with a precision of 5.5 (LA, -8.0 to 13.5). Comparing IBP in the supine position with IGP at 30° showed a bias of -0.8 and precision of 5.6 (LA, -10.1 to 11.6 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IAP measured via a nasogastric tube was less influenced by changing the body position from supine to HOB30 than was bladder pressure. Springer 2012-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3390294/ /pubmed/22873412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rooban et al.; licensee Springer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rooban, Nirooshan Regli, Adrian Davis, Wendy A De Keulenaer, Bart L Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
title | Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
title_full | Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
title_short | Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
title_sort | comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390294/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roobannirooshan comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy AT regliadrian comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy AT daviswendya comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy AT dekeulenaerbartl comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy |