Cargando…

Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is most commonly measured via the bladder with the patient in the supine position. In the ICU, patients are nursed with the head of the bed elevated at 30° (HOB30) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study investigated whether gastri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rooban, Nirooshan, Regli, Adrian, Davis, Wendy A, De Keulenaer, Bart L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S11
_version_ 1782237422164115456
author Rooban, Nirooshan
Regli, Adrian
Davis, Wendy A
De Keulenaer, Bart L
author_facet Rooban, Nirooshan
Regli, Adrian
Davis, Wendy A
De Keulenaer, Bart L
author_sort Rooban, Nirooshan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is most commonly measured via the bladder with the patient in the supine position. In the ICU, patients are nursed with the head of the bed elevated at 30° (HOB30) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study investigated whether gastric pressure at HOB30 can be used as a surrogate measure of IAP via the bladder in the supine position. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a single-centre intensive care unit. A total of 20 patients were included. IAP was recorded simultaneously via the bladder catheter (bladder pressure, IBP) and via nasogastric tube (gastric pressures, IGP) in the supine and HOB30 position. Each patient had three sets of IAP measurements performed at least 4 h apart. RESULTS: In the supine position, mean IBP was 12.3 ± 4.5 mmHg compared to IGP of 11.8 ± 4.7 mmHg. The bias between the two groups was 0.5 and precision of 3.7 (LA, -6.8 to 7.5 mmHg). At 30 degrees, mean IBP was 15.8 ± 4.9 mmHg compared to IGP of 13.1 ± 6.1 mmHg. The bias between both groups was 2.7 with a precision of 5.5 (LA, -8.0 to 13.5). Comparing IBP in the supine position with IGP at 30° showed a bias of -0.8 and precision of 5.6 (LA, -10.1 to 11.6 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IAP measured via a nasogastric tube was less influenced by changing the body position from supine to HOB30 than was bladder pressure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3390294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33902942012-07-06 Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study Rooban, Nirooshan Regli, Adrian Davis, Wendy A De Keulenaer, Bart L Ann Intensive Care Research OBJECTIVES: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is most commonly measured via the bladder with the patient in the supine position. In the ICU, patients are nursed with the head of the bed elevated at 30° (HOB30) to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study investigated whether gastric pressure at HOB30 can be used as a surrogate measure of IAP via the bladder in the supine position. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a single-centre intensive care unit. A total of 20 patients were included. IAP was recorded simultaneously via the bladder catheter (bladder pressure, IBP) and via nasogastric tube (gastric pressures, IGP) in the supine and HOB30 position. Each patient had three sets of IAP measurements performed at least 4 h apart. RESULTS: In the supine position, mean IBP was 12.3 ± 4.5 mmHg compared to IGP of 11.8 ± 4.7 mmHg. The bias between the two groups was 0.5 and precision of 3.7 (LA, -6.8 to 7.5 mmHg). At 30 degrees, mean IBP was 15.8 ± 4.9 mmHg compared to IGP of 13.1 ± 6.1 mmHg. The bias between both groups was 2.7 with a precision of 5.5 (LA, -8.0 to 13.5). Comparing IBP in the supine position with IGP at 30° showed a bias of -0.8 and precision of 5.6 (LA, -10.1 to 11.6 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IAP measured via a nasogastric tube was less influenced by changing the body position from supine to HOB30 than was bladder pressure. Springer 2012-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3390294/ /pubmed/22873412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rooban et al.; licensee Springer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rooban, Nirooshan
Regli, Adrian
Davis, Wendy A
De Keulenaer, Bart L
Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
title Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
title_full Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
title_fullStr Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
title_short Comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
title_sort comparing intra-abdominal pressures in different body positions via a urinary catheter and nasogastric tube: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S11
work_keys_str_mv AT roobannirooshan comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy
AT regliadrian comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy
AT daviswendya comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy
AT dekeulenaerbartl comparingintraabdominalpressuresindifferentbodypositionsviaaurinarycatheterandnasogastrictubeapilotstudy