Cargando…
Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm
Automatic imitation tasks measuring motor priming effects showed that we directly map observed actions of other agents onto our own motor repertoire (direct matching). A recent joint action study using a social dual-task paradigm provided evidence for task monitoring. In the present study, we aimed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00086 |
_version_ | 1782237455376711680 |
---|---|
author | Liepelt, Roman Stenzel, Anna Lappe, Markus |
author_facet | Liepelt, Roman Stenzel, Anna Lappe, Markus |
author_sort | Liepelt, Roman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Automatic imitation tasks measuring motor priming effects showed that we directly map observed actions of other agents onto our own motor repertoire (direct matching). A recent joint action study using a social dual-task paradigm provided evidence for task monitoring. In the present study, we aimed to test (a) if automatic imitation is disturbed during joint action and (b) if task monitoring is content or time dependent. We used a social dual-task that was made of an automatic imitation task (Person 1: Task 1) and a two-choice number task (Person 2: Task 2). Each participant performed one of the two tasks, which were given with a variable stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), in an individual and a joint condition. We found a regular motor priming effect in individual and joint conditions. Under joint conditions, we replicated the previous finding of an increase of reaction times for Person 2 with decreasing SOA. The latter effect was not related to the specific responses performed by both persons. Further, we did not find evidence for a representation of the other's specific S-R mappings. Our findings suggest that (a) automatic imitation is not disturbed during joint action and (b) task monitoring is time dependent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3390591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33905912012-07-10 Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm Liepelt, Roman Stenzel, Anna Lappe, Markus Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Automatic imitation tasks measuring motor priming effects showed that we directly map observed actions of other agents onto our own motor repertoire (direct matching). A recent joint action study using a social dual-task paradigm provided evidence for task monitoring. In the present study, we aimed to test (a) if automatic imitation is disturbed during joint action and (b) if task monitoring is content or time dependent. We used a social dual-task that was made of an automatic imitation task (Person 1: Task 1) and a two-choice number task (Person 2: Task 2). Each participant performed one of the two tasks, which were given with a variable stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), in an individual and a joint condition. We found a regular motor priming effect in individual and joint conditions. Under joint conditions, we replicated the previous finding of an increase of reaction times for Person 2 with decreasing SOA. The latter effect was not related to the specific responses performed by both persons. Further, we did not find evidence for a representation of the other's specific S-R mappings. Our findings suggest that (a) automatic imitation is not disturbed during joint action and (b) task monitoring is time dependent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3390591/ /pubmed/22783178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00086 Text en Copyright © 2012 Liepelt, Stenzel and Lappe. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Liepelt, Roman Stenzel, Anna Lappe, Markus Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
title | Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
title_full | Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
title_fullStr | Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed | Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
title_short | Specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
title_sort | specifying social cognitive processes with a social dual-task paradigm |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3390591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liepeltroman specifyingsocialcognitiveprocesseswithasocialdualtaskparadigm AT stenzelanna specifyingsocialcognitiveprocesseswithasocialdualtaskparadigm AT lappemarkus specifyingsocialcognitiveprocesseswithasocialdualtaskparadigm |