Cargando…

Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men

OBJECTIVES: Considerable interest and controversy over a possible decline in semen quality during the 20th century raised concern that semen quality could have reached a critically low level where it might affect human reproduction. The authors therefore initiated a study to assess reproductive heal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jørgensen, Niels, Joensen, Ulla Nordström, Jensen, Tina Kold, Jensen, Martin Blomberg, Almstrup, Kristian, Olesen, Inge Ahlmann, Juul, Anders, Andersson, Anna-Maria, Carlsen, Elisabeth, Petersen, Jørgen Holm, Toppari, Jorma, Skakkebæk, Niels E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000990
_version_ 1782237519375499264
author Jørgensen, Niels
Joensen, Ulla Nordström
Jensen, Tina Kold
Jensen, Martin Blomberg
Almstrup, Kristian
Olesen, Inge Ahlmann
Juul, Anders
Andersson, Anna-Maria
Carlsen, Elisabeth
Petersen, Jørgen Holm
Toppari, Jorma
Skakkebæk, Niels E
author_facet Jørgensen, Niels
Joensen, Ulla Nordström
Jensen, Tina Kold
Jensen, Martin Blomberg
Almstrup, Kristian
Olesen, Inge Ahlmann
Juul, Anders
Andersson, Anna-Maria
Carlsen, Elisabeth
Petersen, Jørgen Holm
Toppari, Jorma
Skakkebæk, Niels E
author_sort Jørgensen, Niels
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Considerable interest and controversy over a possible decline in semen quality during the 20th century raised concern that semen quality could have reached a critically low level where it might affect human reproduction. The authors therefore initiated a study to assess reproductive health in men from the general population and to monitor changes in semen quality over time. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of men from the general Danish population. Inclusion criteria were place of residence in the Copenhagen area, and both the man and his mother being born and raised in Denmark. Men with severe or chronic diseases were not included. SETTING: Danish one-centre study. PARTICIPANTS: 4867 men, median age 19 years, included from 1996 to 2010. OUTCOME MEASURES: Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology. RESULTS: Only 23% of participants had optimal sperm concentration and sperm morphology. Comparing with historic data of men attending a Copenhagen infertility clinic in the 1940s and men who recently became fathers, these two groups had significantly better semen quality than our study group from the general population. Over the 15 years, median sperm concentration increased from 43 to 48 million/ml (p=0.02) and total sperm count from 132 to 151 million (p=0.001). The median percentage of motile spermatozoa and abnormal spermatozoa were 68% and 93%, and did not change during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This large prospective study of semen quality among young men of the general population showed an increasing trend in sperm concentration and total sperm count. However, only one in four men had optimal semen quality. In addition, one in four will most likely face a prolonged waiting time to pregnancy if they in the future want to father a child and another 15% are at risk of the need of fertility treatment. Thus, reduced semen quality seems so frequent that it may impair the fertility rates and further increase the demand for assisted reproduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3391374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33913742012-07-10 Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men Jørgensen, Niels Joensen, Ulla Nordström Jensen, Tina Kold Jensen, Martin Blomberg Almstrup, Kristian Olesen, Inge Ahlmann Juul, Anders Andersson, Anna-Maria Carlsen, Elisabeth Petersen, Jørgen Holm Toppari, Jorma Skakkebæk, Niels E BMJ Open Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: Considerable interest and controversy over a possible decline in semen quality during the 20th century raised concern that semen quality could have reached a critically low level where it might affect human reproduction. The authors therefore initiated a study to assess reproductive health in men from the general population and to monitor changes in semen quality over time. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of men from the general Danish population. Inclusion criteria were place of residence in the Copenhagen area, and both the man and his mother being born and raised in Denmark. Men with severe or chronic diseases were not included. SETTING: Danish one-centre study. PARTICIPANTS: 4867 men, median age 19 years, included from 1996 to 2010. OUTCOME MEASURES: Semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology. RESULTS: Only 23% of participants had optimal sperm concentration and sperm morphology. Comparing with historic data of men attending a Copenhagen infertility clinic in the 1940s and men who recently became fathers, these two groups had significantly better semen quality than our study group from the general population. Over the 15 years, median sperm concentration increased from 43 to 48 million/ml (p=0.02) and total sperm count from 132 to 151 million (p=0.001). The median percentage of motile spermatozoa and abnormal spermatozoa were 68% and 93%, and did not change during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This large prospective study of semen quality among young men of the general population showed an increasing trend in sperm concentration and total sperm count. However, only one in four men had optimal semen quality. In addition, one in four will most likely face a prolonged waiting time to pregnancy if they in the future want to father a child and another 15% are at risk of the need of fertility treatment. Thus, reduced semen quality seems so frequent that it may impair the fertility rates and further increase the demand for assisted reproduction. BMJ Group 2012-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3391374/ /pubmed/22761286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000990 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Jørgensen, Niels
Joensen, Ulla Nordström
Jensen, Tina Kold
Jensen, Martin Blomberg
Almstrup, Kristian
Olesen, Inge Ahlmann
Juul, Anders
Andersson, Anna-Maria
Carlsen, Elisabeth
Petersen, Jørgen Holm
Toppari, Jorma
Skakkebæk, Niels E
Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
title Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
title_full Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
title_fullStr Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
title_full_unstemmed Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
title_short Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
title_sort human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men
topic Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000990
work_keys_str_mv AT jørgensenniels humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT joensenullanordstrom humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT jensentinakold humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT jensenmartinblomberg humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT almstrupkristian humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT oleseningeahlmann humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT juulanders humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT anderssonannamaria humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT carlsenelisabeth humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT petersenjørgenholm humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT topparijorma humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men
AT skakkebæknielse humansemenqualityinthenewmillenniumaprospectivecrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyof4867men