Cargando…

Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is increasingly diagnosed in current aging society. Echocardiography is the most important tool in the assessment of AS and its severity. However, load-dependency of Doppler measurement could affect the accuracy of AS severity assessment. We tried to evaluate the imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sung-A, Kim, Hyung-Kwan, Sohn, Dae-Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Echocardiography 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787524
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2012.20.2.79
_version_ 1782237527960190976
author Chang, Sung-A
Kim, Hyung-Kwan
Sohn, Dae-Won
author_facet Chang, Sung-A
Kim, Hyung-Kwan
Sohn, Dae-Won
author_sort Chang, Sung-A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is increasingly diagnosed in current aging society. Echocardiography is the most important tool in the assessment of AS and its severity. However, load-dependency of Doppler measurement could affect the accuracy of AS severity assessment. We tried to evaluate the impact of afterload on the assessment of AS severity by modification of afterload using pneumatic compression (Pcom). METHODS: Forty patients diagnosed as moderate or severe AS [effective orifice area of aortic valve (EOA(AV)) by continuity equation of < 1.5 cm(2)] were consecutively enrolled. Patients with severely uncontrolled hypertension, severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and other significant valve disease were excluded. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed at baseline to assess AS severity. Then, pneumatic compression of the lower extremities by 100 mmHg was applied to increase LV afterload. After 3 minutes, echocardiography was repeated to assess AS severity. RESULTS: Mean blood pressure was significantly increased under Pcom (p < 0.001), while heart rate remained unchanged. Peak aortic valve velocity (V(max)) was slightly, but significantly decreased under Pcom (p = 0.03). However, Doppler velocity index and EOA(AV) by continuity equation were not affected by Pcom. CONCLUSION: AS severity assessment by echocardiography was not dependent on the change of LV afterload imposed by Pcom. AV V(max) was slightly decreased with LV afterload increment, but these changes were too small to alter treatment plan of AS patients. EOA(AV) and Doppler velocity index are more stable parameters for AS severity assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3391632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Korean Society of Echocardiography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33916322012-07-11 Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis Chang, Sung-A Kim, Hyung-Kwan Sohn, Dae-Won J Cardiovasc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is increasingly diagnosed in current aging society. Echocardiography is the most important tool in the assessment of AS and its severity. However, load-dependency of Doppler measurement could affect the accuracy of AS severity assessment. We tried to evaluate the impact of afterload on the assessment of AS severity by modification of afterload using pneumatic compression (Pcom). METHODS: Forty patients diagnosed as moderate or severe AS [effective orifice area of aortic valve (EOA(AV)) by continuity equation of < 1.5 cm(2)] were consecutively enrolled. Patients with severely uncontrolled hypertension, severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and other significant valve disease were excluded. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed at baseline to assess AS severity. Then, pneumatic compression of the lower extremities by 100 mmHg was applied to increase LV afterload. After 3 minutes, echocardiography was repeated to assess AS severity. RESULTS: Mean blood pressure was significantly increased under Pcom (p < 0.001), while heart rate remained unchanged. Peak aortic valve velocity (V(max)) was slightly, but significantly decreased under Pcom (p = 0.03). However, Doppler velocity index and EOA(AV) by continuity equation were not affected by Pcom. CONCLUSION: AS severity assessment by echocardiography was not dependent on the change of LV afterload imposed by Pcom. AV V(max) was slightly decreased with LV afterload increment, but these changes were too small to alter treatment plan of AS patients. EOA(AV) and Doppler velocity index are more stable parameters for AS severity assessment. Korean Society of Echocardiography 2012-06 2012-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3391632/ /pubmed/22787524 http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2012.20.2.79 Text en Copyright © 2012 Korean Society of Echocardiography http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chang, Sung-A
Kim, Hyung-Kwan
Sohn, Dae-Won
Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
title Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
title_full Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
title_fullStr Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
title_short Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
title_sort impact of afterload on the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787524
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2012.20.2.79
work_keys_str_mv AT changsunga impactofafterloadontheassessmentofseverityofaorticstenosis
AT kimhyungkwan impactofafterloadontheassessmentofseverityofaorticstenosis
AT sohndaewon impactofafterloadontheassessmentofseverityofaorticstenosis