Cargando…

Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury and increased patellofemoral joint compression forces (PFJCF) may aggravate symptoms. Backward running (BR) has been suggested for exercise with reduced PFJCF. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate if BR had reduced peak PFJCF compared to forward...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roos, Paulien E., Barton, Nick, van Deursen, Robert W.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22503882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.020
_version_ 1782237534882889728
author Roos, Paulien E.
Barton, Nick
van Deursen, Robert W.M.
author_facet Roos, Paulien E.
Barton, Nick
van Deursen, Robert W.M.
author_sort Roos, Paulien E.
collection PubMed
description Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury and increased patellofemoral joint compression forces (PFJCF) may aggravate symptoms. Backward running (BR) has been suggested for exercise with reduced PFJCF. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate if BR had reduced peak PFJCF compared to forward running (FR) at the same speed, and (2) if PFJCF was reduced in BR, to investigate which biomechanical parameters explained this. It was hypothesized that (1) PFJCF would be lower in BR, and (2) that this would coincide with a reduced peak knee moment caused by altered ground reaction forces (GRFs). Twenty healthy subjects ran in forward and backward directions at consistent speed. Kinematic and ground reaction force data were collected; inverse dynamic and PFJCF analyses were performed. PFJCF were higher in FR than BR (4.5±1.5; 3.4±1.4BW; p<0.01). The majority of this difference (93.1%) was predicted by increased knee moments in FR compared to BR (157±54; 124±51 Nm; p<0.01). 54.8% of differences in knee moments could be predicted by the magnitude of the GRF (2.3±0.3; 2.4±0.2BW), knee flexion angle (44±6; 41±7) and center of pressure location on the foot (25±11; 12±6%) at time of peak knee moment. Results were not consistent in all subjects. It was concluded that BR had reduced PFJCF compared to FR. This was caused by an increased knee moment, due to differences in magnitude and location of the GRF vector relative to the knee. BR can therefore be used to exercise with decreased PFJCF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3391667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33916672012-07-19 Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running Roos, Paulien E. Barton, Nick van Deursen, Robert W.M. J Biomech Article Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury and increased patellofemoral joint compression forces (PFJCF) may aggravate symptoms. Backward running (BR) has been suggested for exercise with reduced PFJCF. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate if BR had reduced peak PFJCF compared to forward running (FR) at the same speed, and (2) if PFJCF was reduced in BR, to investigate which biomechanical parameters explained this. It was hypothesized that (1) PFJCF would be lower in BR, and (2) that this would coincide with a reduced peak knee moment caused by altered ground reaction forces (GRFs). Twenty healthy subjects ran in forward and backward directions at consistent speed. Kinematic and ground reaction force data were collected; inverse dynamic and PFJCF analyses were performed. PFJCF were higher in FR than BR (4.5±1.5; 3.4±1.4BW; p<0.01). The majority of this difference (93.1%) was predicted by increased knee moments in FR compared to BR (157±54; 124±51 Nm; p<0.01). 54.8% of differences in knee moments could be predicted by the magnitude of the GRF (2.3±0.3; 2.4±0.2BW), knee flexion angle (44±6; 41±7) and center of pressure location on the foot (25±11; 12±6%) at time of peak knee moment. Results were not consistent in all subjects. It was concluded that BR had reduced PFJCF compared to FR. This was caused by an increased knee moment, due to differences in magnitude and location of the GRF vector relative to the knee. BR can therefore be used to exercise with decreased PFJCF. Elsevier Science 2012-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3391667/ /pubmed/22503882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.020 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Roos, Paulien E.
Barton, Nick
van Deursen, Robert W.M.
Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
title Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
title_full Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
title_fullStr Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
title_full_unstemmed Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
title_short Patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
title_sort patellofemoral joint compression forces in backward and forward running
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22503882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.020
work_keys_str_mv AT roospauliene patellofemoraljointcompressionforcesinbackwardandforwardrunning
AT bartonnick patellofemoraljointcompressionforcesinbackwardandforwardrunning
AT vandeursenrobertwm patellofemoraljointcompressionforcesinbackwardandforwardrunning