Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis

PURPOSE: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are effective treatment options for biceps pathology, but outcomes of revision surgery are not known. This study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone a revision biceps tenodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregory, J. M., Harwood, D. P., Gochanour, E., Sherman, S. L., Romeo, A. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787333
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.96993
_version_ 1782237544985919488
author Gregory, J. M.
Harwood, D. P.
Gochanour, E.
Sherman, S. L.
Romeo, A. A.
author_facet Gregory, J. M.
Harwood, D. P.
Gochanour, E.
Sherman, S. L.
Romeo, A. A.
author_sort Gregory, J. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are effective treatment options for biceps pathology, but outcomes of revision surgery are not known. This study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone a revision biceps tenodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients since 2004 (N = 21) who had undergone a revision biceps tenodesis with greater than 6-month follow-up was completed. A follow-up survey was carried out, and the visual analog scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were obtained, along with SF-12 Mental (MCS-12) and Physical Component Summaries (PCS-12). RESULTS: Indications for revision surgery were continued pain (14) and ruptured biceps (7). Complete follow-up examinations were performed in 15 of 21 patients (71.4%). Average follow-up was 33.4 ± 23.5 months. The mean postoperative scores were 1.9 out of 10, VAS; 79 out of 100, SANE; 10.2 out of 12, SST; 83 out of 100, ASES; 29 out of 35, UCLA; 44, PCS- 12; and 47.1, MCS- 12. Five patients were considered failures with a UCLA score below 27. Seventeen of twenty-one patient underwent concomitant procedures. Complete preoperative and postoperative data were collected for 14 patients. All scores demonstrated highly significant improvement from preoperative levels (P < 0.005), except for the MCS-12. There was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes of revision due to rupture and revision due to persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis provides significant pain relief and improvement in functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 33.4 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series, Level 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3391784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33917842012-07-11 Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis Gregory, J. M. Harwood, D. P. Gochanour, E. Sherman, S. L. Romeo, A. A. Int J Shoulder Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Biceps tenotomy and tenodesis are effective treatment options for biceps pathology, but outcomes of revision surgery are not known. This study examines the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone a revision biceps tenodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients since 2004 (N = 21) who had undergone a revision biceps tenodesis with greater than 6-month follow-up was completed. A follow-up survey was carried out, and the visual analog scale (VAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were obtained, along with SF-12 Mental (MCS-12) and Physical Component Summaries (PCS-12). RESULTS: Indications for revision surgery were continued pain (14) and ruptured biceps (7). Complete follow-up examinations were performed in 15 of 21 patients (71.4%). Average follow-up was 33.4 ± 23.5 months. The mean postoperative scores were 1.9 out of 10, VAS; 79 out of 100, SANE; 10.2 out of 12, SST; 83 out of 100, ASES; 29 out of 35, UCLA; 44, PCS- 12; and 47.1, MCS- 12. Five patients were considered failures with a UCLA score below 27. Seventeen of twenty-one patient underwent concomitant procedures. Complete preoperative and postoperative data were collected for 14 patients. All scores demonstrated highly significant improvement from preoperative levels (P < 0.005), except for the MCS-12. There was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes of revision due to rupture and revision due to persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis provides significant pain relief and improvement in functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 33.4 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case Series, Level 4. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3391784/ /pubmed/22787333 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.96993 Text en Copyright: © International Journal of Shoulder Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gregory, J. M.
Harwood, D. P.
Gochanour, E.
Sherman, S. L.
Romeo, A. A.
Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
title Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
title_full Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
title_short Clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
title_sort clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787333
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.96993
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoryjm clinicaloutcomesofrevisionbicepstenodesis
AT harwooddp clinicaloutcomesofrevisionbicepstenodesis
AT gochanoure clinicaloutcomesofrevisionbicepstenodesis
AT shermansl clinicaloutcomesofrevisionbicepstenodesis
AT romeoaa clinicaloutcomesofrevisionbicepstenodesis