Cargando…
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations are widely used in clinical practice for quick assessment of kidney function. Gates method using radionuclide technique is an alternative to prediction equations for quick assessment of GFR. Aim of the study was to compare Gates method and modifi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787311 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.97123 |
_version_ | 1782237549929955328 |
---|---|
author | Prasad, N. Barai, S. Gambhir, S. Parasar, D. S. Ora, M. Gupta, A. Sharma, R. K. |
author_facet | Prasad, N. Barai, S. Gambhir, S. Parasar, D. S. Ora, M. Gupta, A. Sharma, R. K. |
author_sort | Prasad, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations are widely used in clinical practice for quick assessment of kidney function. Gates method using radionuclide technique is an alternative to prediction equations for quick assessment of GFR. Aim of the study was to compare Gates method and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation in a sizeable patient population with wide range of renal function to evaluate their clinical utility. GFR was estimated in 897 subjects with wide range of renal function by gates method, and MDRD equation and results were compared against measured GFR. Subjects were divided in to 4 groups (0-30 ml, 31-60 ml, 61-90 ml, >90 ml) on the basis of measured GFR and comparison between two methods done through linear regression analysis. Analysis of R(2) indicated that 56% of the interindividual variability for Gates GFR was in accordance to variation in measured GFR, in the GFR range of (0-30 ml), this value dropped to 39% in the GFR range of 31-60 ml, 40% in the GFR range of 61-90 ml, 26.4% in the GFR range of >90 ml, the corresponding figure for MDRD GFR were 47.9%, 31.1%, 17.6% and 16.1%, respectively. Gates method is more precise for GFR estimation at all levels of renal function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3391806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33918062012-07-11 Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method Prasad, N. Barai, S. Gambhir, S. Parasar, D. S. Ora, M. Gupta, A. Sharma, R. K. Indian J Nephrol Original Article Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations are widely used in clinical practice for quick assessment of kidney function. Gates method using radionuclide technique is an alternative to prediction equations for quick assessment of GFR. Aim of the study was to compare Gates method and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation in a sizeable patient population with wide range of renal function to evaluate their clinical utility. GFR was estimated in 897 subjects with wide range of renal function by gates method, and MDRD equation and results were compared against measured GFR. Subjects were divided in to 4 groups (0-30 ml, 31-60 ml, 61-90 ml, >90 ml) on the basis of measured GFR and comparison between two methods done through linear regression analysis. Analysis of R(2) indicated that 56% of the interindividual variability for Gates GFR was in accordance to variation in measured GFR, in the GFR range of (0-30 ml), this value dropped to 39% in the GFR range of 31-60 ml, 40% in the GFR range of 61-90 ml, 26.4% in the GFR range of >90 ml, the corresponding figure for MDRD GFR were 47.9%, 31.1%, 17.6% and 16.1%, respectively. Gates method is more precise for GFR estimation at all levels of renal function. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3391806/ /pubmed/22787311 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.97123 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Prasad, N. Barai, S. Gambhir, S. Parasar, D. S. Ora, M. Gupta, A. Sharma, R. K. Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method |
title | Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method |
title_full | Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method |
title_fullStr | Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method |
title_short | Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method |
title_sort | comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and gates method |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787311 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.97123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prasadn comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod AT barais comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod AT gambhirs comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod AT parasards comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod AT oram comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod AT guptaa comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod AT sharmark comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod |