Cargando…

Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations are widely used in clinical practice for quick assessment of kidney function. Gates method using radionuclide technique is an alternative to prediction equations for quick assessment of GFR. Aim of the study was to compare Gates method and modifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasad, N., Barai, S., Gambhir, S., Parasar, D. S., Ora, M., Gupta, A., Sharma, R. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787311
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.97123
_version_ 1782237549929955328
author Prasad, N.
Barai, S.
Gambhir, S.
Parasar, D. S.
Ora, M.
Gupta, A.
Sharma, R. K.
author_facet Prasad, N.
Barai, S.
Gambhir, S.
Parasar, D. S.
Ora, M.
Gupta, A.
Sharma, R. K.
author_sort Prasad, N.
collection PubMed
description Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations are widely used in clinical practice for quick assessment of kidney function. Gates method using radionuclide technique is an alternative to prediction equations for quick assessment of GFR. Aim of the study was to compare Gates method and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation in a sizeable patient population with wide range of renal function to evaluate their clinical utility. GFR was estimated in 897 subjects with wide range of renal function by gates method, and MDRD equation and results were compared against measured GFR. Subjects were divided in to 4 groups (0-30 ml, 31-60 ml, 61-90 ml, >90 ml) on the basis of measured GFR and comparison between two methods done through linear regression analysis. Analysis of R(2) indicated that 56% of the interindividual variability for Gates GFR was in accordance to variation in measured GFR, in the GFR range of (0-30 ml), this value dropped to 39% in the GFR range of 31-60 ml, 40% in the GFR range of 61-90 ml, 26.4% in the GFR range of >90 ml, the corresponding figure for MDRD GFR were 47.9%, 31.1%, 17.6% and 16.1%, respectively. Gates method is more precise for GFR estimation at all levels of renal function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3391806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33918062012-07-11 Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method Prasad, N. Barai, S. Gambhir, S. Parasar, D. S. Ora, M. Gupta, A. Sharma, R. K. Indian J Nephrol Original Article Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction equations are widely used in clinical practice for quick assessment of kidney function. Gates method using radionuclide technique is an alternative to prediction equations for quick assessment of GFR. Aim of the study was to compare Gates method and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation in a sizeable patient population with wide range of renal function to evaluate their clinical utility. GFR was estimated in 897 subjects with wide range of renal function by gates method, and MDRD equation and results were compared against measured GFR. Subjects were divided in to 4 groups (0-30 ml, 31-60 ml, 61-90 ml, >90 ml) on the basis of measured GFR and comparison between two methods done through linear regression analysis. Analysis of R(2) indicated that 56% of the interindividual variability for Gates GFR was in accordance to variation in measured GFR, in the GFR range of (0-30 ml), this value dropped to 39% in the GFR range of 31-60 ml, 40% in the GFR range of 61-90 ml, 26.4% in the GFR range of >90 ml, the corresponding figure for MDRD GFR were 47.9%, 31.1%, 17.6% and 16.1%, respectively. Gates method is more precise for GFR estimation at all levels of renal function. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3391806/ /pubmed/22787311 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.97123 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nephrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prasad, N.
Barai, S.
Gambhir, S.
Parasar, D. S.
Ora, M.
Gupta, A.
Sharma, R. K.
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
title Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
title_full Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
title_fullStr Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
title_short Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and Gates method
title_sort comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimated by plasma clearance method with modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation and gates method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787311
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.97123
work_keys_str_mv AT prasadn comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod
AT barais comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod
AT gambhirs comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod
AT parasards comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod
AT oram comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod
AT guptaa comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod
AT sharmark comparisonofglomerularfiltrationrateestimatedbyplasmaclearancemethodwithmodificationofdietinrenaldiseasepredictionequationandgatesmethod