Cargando…

The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma

BRAF is a serine/threonine protein kinase activating the MAP kinase/ERK-signaling pathway. About 50 % of melanomas harbors activating BRAF mutations (over 90 % V600E). BRAFV600E has been implicated in different mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis, most of which due to the deregulated activation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ascierto, Paolo A, Kirkwood, John M, Grob, Jean-Jacques, Simeone, Ester, Grimaldi, Antonio M, Maio, Michele, Palmieri, Giuseppe, Testori, Alessandro, Marincola, Francesco M, Mozzillo, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22554099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-85
_version_ 1782237584325345280
author Ascierto, Paolo A
Kirkwood, John M
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Simeone, Ester
Grimaldi, Antonio M
Maio, Michele
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Testori, Alessandro
Marincola, Francesco M
Mozzillo, Nicola
author_facet Ascierto, Paolo A
Kirkwood, John M
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Simeone, Ester
Grimaldi, Antonio M
Maio, Michele
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Testori, Alessandro
Marincola, Francesco M
Mozzillo, Nicola
author_sort Ascierto, Paolo A
collection PubMed
description BRAF is a serine/threonine protein kinase activating the MAP kinase/ERK-signaling pathway. About 50 % of melanomas harbors activating BRAF mutations (over 90 % V600E). BRAFV600E has been implicated in different mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis, most of which due to the deregulated activation of the downstream MEK/ERK effectors. The first selective inhibitor of mutant BRAF, vemurafenib, after highly encouraging results of the phase I and II trial, was compared to dacarbazine in a phase III trial in treatment-naïve patients (BRIM-3). The study results showed a relative reduction of 63 % in risk of death and 74 % in risk of tumor progression. Considering all trials so far completed, median overall survival reached approximately 16 months for vemurafenib compared to less than 10 months for dacarbazine treatment. Vemurafenib has been extensively tested on melanoma patients expressing the BRAFV600E mutated form; it has been demonstrated to be also effective in inhibiting melanomas carrying the V600K mutation. In 2011, both FDA and EMA therefore approved vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma carrying BRAFV600 mutations. Some findings suggest that continuation of vemurafenib treatment is potentially beneficial after local therapy in a subset of patients with disease progression (PD). Among who continued vemurafenib >30 days after local therapy of PD lesion(s), a median overall survival was not reached, with a median follow-up of 15.5 months from initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy. For patients who did not continue treatment, median overall survival from the time of disease progression was 1.4 months. A clinical phase I/II trial is evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of vemurafenib in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor mAb ipilimumab. In the BRIM-7 trial vemurafenib is tested in association with GDC-0973, a potent and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1/2. Preliminary data seem to indicate that an additional inhibitor of mutated BRAF, GSK2118436, might be also active on a wider range of BRAF mutations (V600E-K-D-R); actually, treatment with such a compound is under evaluation in a phase III study among stage III-IV melanoma patients positive for BRAF mutations. Overall, BRAF inhibitors were well tolerated; common adverse events are arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea, with some variants between different inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3391993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33919932012-07-10 The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma Ascierto, Paolo A Kirkwood, John M Grob, Jean-Jacques Simeone, Ester Grimaldi, Antonio M Maio, Michele Palmieri, Giuseppe Testori, Alessandro Marincola, Francesco M Mozzillo, Nicola J Transl Med Commentary BRAF is a serine/threonine protein kinase activating the MAP kinase/ERK-signaling pathway. About 50 % of melanomas harbors activating BRAF mutations (over 90 % V600E). BRAFV600E has been implicated in different mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis, most of which due to the deregulated activation of the downstream MEK/ERK effectors. The first selective inhibitor of mutant BRAF, vemurafenib, after highly encouraging results of the phase I and II trial, was compared to dacarbazine in a phase III trial in treatment-naïve patients (BRIM-3). The study results showed a relative reduction of 63 % in risk of death and 74 % in risk of tumor progression. Considering all trials so far completed, median overall survival reached approximately 16 months for vemurafenib compared to less than 10 months for dacarbazine treatment. Vemurafenib has been extensively tested on melanoma patients expressing the BRAFV600E mutated form; it has been demonstrated to be also effective in inhibiting melanomas carrying the V600K mutation. In 2011, both FDA and EMA therefore approved vemurafenib for metastatic melanoma carrying BRAFV600 mutations. Some findings suggest that continuation of vemurafenib treatment is potentially beneficial after local therapy in a subset of patients with disease progression (PD). Among who continued vemurafenib >30 days after local therapy of PD lesion(s), a median overall survival was not reached, with a median follow-up of 15.5 months from initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy. For patients who did not continue treatment, median overall survival from the time of disease progression was 1.4 months. A clinical phase I/II trial is evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of vemurafenib in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor mAb ipilimumab. In the BRIM-7 trial vemurafenib is tested in association with GDC-0973, a potent and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1/2. Preliminary data seem to indicate that an additional inhibitor of mutated BRAF, GSK2118436, might be also active on a wider range of BRAF mutations (V600E-K-D-R); actually, treatment with such a compound is under evaluation in a phase III study among stage III-IV melanoma patients positive for BRAF mutations. Overall, BRAF inhibitors were well tolerated; common adverse events are arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea, with some variants between different inhibitors. BioMed Central 2012-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3391993/ /pubmed/22554099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-85 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ascierto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Ascierto, Paolo A
Kirkwood, John M
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Simeone, Ester
Grimaldi, Antonio M
Maio, Michele
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Testori, Alessandro
Marincola, Francesco M
Mozzillo, Nicola
The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
title The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
title_full The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
title_fullStr The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
title_full_unstemmed The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
title_short The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma
title_sort role of braf v600 mutation in melanoma
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3391993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22554099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-85
work_keys_str_mv AT asciertopaoloa theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT kirkwoodjohnm theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT grobjeanjacques theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT simeoneester theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT grimaldiantoniom theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT maiomichele theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT palmierigiuseppe theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT testorialessandro theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT marincolafrancescom theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT mozzillonicola theroleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT asciertopaoloa roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT kirkwoodjohnm roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT grobjeanjacques roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT simeoneester roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT grimaldiantoniom roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT maiomichele roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT palmierigiuseppe roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT testorialessandro roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT marincolafrancescom roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma
AT mozzillonicola roleofbrafv600mutationinmelanoma