Cargando…
Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing
BACKGROUND: Women who undergo breast cancer surgery have a high risk of developing persistent pain. We investigated brain processing of painful stimuli using electroencephalograms (EEG) to identify event-related potentials (ERPs) in patients with persistent pain after breast cancer treatment. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3392843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22792001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S30487 |
_version_ | 1782237657872465920 |
---|---|
author | van den Broeke, Emanuel N de Vries, Marjan van Goor, Harry Vissers, Kris CP van Rijn, Clementina M Wilder-Smith, Oliver HG |
author_facet | van den Broeke, Emanuel N de Vries, Marjan van Goor, Harry Vissers, Kris CP van Rijn, Clementina M Wilder-Smith, Oliver HG |
author_sort | van den Broeke, Emanuel N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women who undergo breast cancer surgery have a high risk of developing persistent pain. We investigated brain processing of painful stimuli using electroencephalograms (EEG) to identify event-related potentials (ERPs) in patients with persistent pain after breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Nineteen patients (eight women with persistent pain, eleven without persistent pain), who were surgically treated more than 1 year previously for breast cancer (mastectomy, lumpectomy, and axillary lymph node dissection) and/or had chemoradiotherapy, were recruited and compared with eleven healthy female volunteers. A block of 20 painful electrical stimuli was applied to the calf, somatopically remote from the initially injured or painful area. Simultaneously an EEG was recorded, and a visual analog scale (VAS) pain rating obtained. RESULTS: In comparison with healthy volunteers, breast cancer treatment without persistent pain is associated with accelerated stimulus processing (reduced P260 latency) and shows a tendency to be less intense (lower P260 amplitude). In comparison to patients without persistent pain, persistent pain after breast cancer treatment is associated with stimulus processing that is both delayed (ie, increased latency of the ERP positivity between 250–310 ms [P260]), and enhanced (ie, enhanced P260 amplitude). CONCLUSION: These results show that treatment and persistent pain have opposite effects on cortical responsiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3392843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33928432012-07-12 Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing van den Broeke, Emanuel N de Vries, Marjan van Goor, Harry Vissers, Kris CP van Rijn, Clementina M Wilder-Smith, Oliver HG J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Women who undergo breast cancer surgery have a high risk of developing persistent pain. We investigated brain processing of painful stimuli using electroencephalograms (EEG) to identify event-related potentials (ERPs) in patients with persistent pain after breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Nineteen patients (eight women with persistent pain, eleven without persistent pain), who were surgically treated more than 1 year previously for breast cancer (mastectomy, lumpectomy, and axillary lymph node dissection) and/or had chemoradiotherapy, were recruited and compared with eleven healthy female volunteers. A block of 20 painful electrical stimuli was applied to the calf, somatopically remote from the initially injured or painful area. Simultaneously an EEG was recorded, and a visual analog scale (VAS) pain rating obtained. RESULTS: In comparison with healthy volunteers, breast cancer treatment without persistent pain is associated with accelerated stimulus processing (reduced P260 latency) and shows a tendency to be less intense (lower P260 amplitude). In comparison to patients without persistent pain, persistent pain after breast cancer treatment is associated with stimulus processing that is both delayed (ie, increased latency of the ERP positivity between 250–310 ms [P260]), and enhanced (ie, enhanced P260 amplitude). CONCLUSION: These results show that treatment and persistent pain have opposite effects on cortical responsiveness. Dove Medical Press 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3392843/ /pubmed/22792001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S30487 Text en © 2012 van den Broeke et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research van den Broeke, Emanuel N de Vries, Marjan van Goor, Harry Vissers, Kris CP van Rijn, Clementina M Wilder-Smith, Oliver HG Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
title | Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
title_full | Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
title_fullStr | Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
title_short | Patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
title_sort | patients with persistent pain after breast cancer surgery show both delayed and enhanced cortical stimulus processing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3392843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22792001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S30487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandenbroekeemanueln patientswithpersistentpainafterbreastcancersurgeryshowbothdelayedandenhancedcorticalstimulusprocessing AT devriesmarjan patientswithpersistentpainafterbreastcancersurgeryshowbothdelayedandenhancedcorticalstimulusprocessing AT vangoorharry patientswithpersistentpainafterbreastcancersurgeryshowbothdelayedandenhancedcorticalstimulusprocessing AT visserskriscp patientswithpersistentpainafterbreastcancersurgeryshowbothdelayedandenhancedcorticalstimulusprocessing AT vanrijnclementinam patientswithpersistentpainafterbreastcancersurgeryshowbothdelayedandenhancedcorticalstimulusprocessing AT wildersmitholiverhg patientswithpersistentpainafterbreastcancersurgeryshowbothdelayedandenhancedcorticalstimulusprocessing |