Cargando…
HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that AR...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3393666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260 |
_version_ | 1782237745218846720 |
---|---|
author | Smith, M. Kumi Powers, Kimberly A. Muessig, Kathryn E. Miller, William C. Cohen, Myron S. |
author_facet | Smith, M. Kumi Powers, Kimberly A. Muessig, Kathryn E. Miller, William C. Cohen, Myron S. |
author_sort | Smith, M. Kumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3393666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33936662012-07-16 HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation Smith, M. Kumi Powers, Kimberly A. Muessig, Kathryn E. Miller, William C. Cohen, Myron S. PLoS Med Review Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention. Public Library of Science 2012-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3393666/ /pubmed/22802740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260 Text en Smith et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Smith, M. Kumi Powers, Kimberly A. Muessig, Kathryn E. Miller, William C. Cohen, Myron S. HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation |
title | HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation |
title_full | HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation |
title_fullStr | HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation |
title_full_unstemmed | HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation |
title_short | HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation |
title_sort | hiv treatment as prevention: the utility and limitations of ecological observation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3393666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithmkumi hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation AT powerskimberlya hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation AT muessigkathryne hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation AT millerwilliamc hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation AT cohenmyrons hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation |