Cargando…

HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation

Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that AR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, M. Kumi, Powers, Kimberly A., Muessig, Kathryn E., Miller, William C., Cohen, Myron S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3393666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260
_version_ 1782237745218846720
author Smith, M. Kumi
Powers, Kimberly A.
Muessig, Kathryn E.
Miller, William C.
Cohen, Myron S.
author_facet Smith, M. Kumi
Powers, Kimberly A.
Muessig, Kathryn E.
Miller, William C.
Cohen, Myron S.
author_sort Smith, M. Kumi
collection PubMed
description Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3393666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33936662012-07-16 HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation Smith, M. Kumi Powers, Kimberly A. Muessig, Kathryn E. Miller, William C. Cohen, Myron S. PLoS Med Review Results from several observational studies of HIV-discordant couples and a randomized controlled trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052) show that antiretroviral therapy (ART) can greatly reduce heterosexual HIV transmission in stable HIV-discordant couples. However, such data do not prove that ART will reduce HIV incidence at the population level. Observational investigations using ecological measures have been used to support the implementation of HIV treatment for the specific purpose of preventing transmission at the population level. Many of these studies note ecological associations between measures of increased ART uptake and decreased HIV transmission. Given the urgency of implementing HIV prevention measures, ecological studies must de facto be used to inform current strategies. However, the hypothesis that widespread ART can eliminate HIV infection may have raised expectations beyond what we may be able to achieve. Here we review and discuss the construct of the exposure and outcome measures and analysis methods used in ecological studies. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of ecological analyses, we aim to aid understanding of the findings from these studies to inform future policy decisions regarding the use of ART for HIV prevention. Public Library of Science 2012-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3393666/ /pubmed/22802740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260 Text en Smith et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Smith, M. Kumi
Powers, Kimberly A.
Muessig, Kathryn E.
Miller, William C.
Cohen, Myron S.
HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
title HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
title_full HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
title_fullStr HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
title_full_unstemmed HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
title_short HIV Treatment as Prevention: The Utility and Limitations of Ecological Observation
title_sort hiv treatment as prevention: the utility and limitations of ecological observation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3393666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001260
work_keys_str_mv AT smithmkumi hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation
AT powerskimberlya hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation
AT muessigkathryne hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation
AT millerwilliamc hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation
AT cohenmyrons hivtreatmentaspreventiontheutilityandlimitationsofecologicalobservation