Cargando…
Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participa...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205 |
_version_ | 1782237860485660672 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Lara L. Golonka, Sabrina |
author_facet | Jones, Lara L. Golonka, Sabrina |
author_sort | Jones, Lara L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3394378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33943782012-07-13 Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations Jones, Lara L. Golonka, Sabrina Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3394378/ /pubmed/22798950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205 Text en Copyright © 2012 Jones and Golonka. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Jones, Lara L. Golonka, Sabrina Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
title | Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
title_full | Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
title_fullStr | Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
title_full_unstemmed | Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
title_short | Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
title_sort | different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joneslaral differentinfluencesonlexicalprimingforintegrativethematicandtaxonomicrelations AT golonkasabrina differentinfluencesonlexicalprimingforintegrativethematicandtaxonomicrelations |