Cargando…

Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations

Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Lara L., Golonka, Sabrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205
_version_ 1782237860485660672
author Jones, Lara L.
Golonka, Sabrina
author_facet Jones, Lara L.
Golonka, Sabrina
author_sort Jones, Lara L.
collection PubMed
description Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3394378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33943782012-07-13 Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations Jones, Lara L. Golonka, Sabrina Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit—cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party—cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin—cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3394378/ /pubmed/22798950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205 Text en Copyright © 2012 Jones and Golonka. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jones, Lara L.
Golonka, Sabrina
Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
title Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
title_full Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
title_fullStr Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
title_full_unstemmed Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
title_short Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
title_sort different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22798950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205
work_keys_str_mv AT joneslaral differentinfluencesonlexicalprimingforintegrativethematicandtaxonomicrelations
AT golonkasabrina differentinfluencesonlexicalprimingforintegrativethematicandtaxonomicrelations