Cargando…
Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review
A systematic review to examine the efficacy of computer-based cognitive interventions for cognitively healthy older adults was conducted. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: average sample age of at least 55 years at time of training; participants did not have Alzheimer’s disea...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22792378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588 |
_version_ | 1782237881413140480 |
---|---|
author | Kueider, Alexandra M. Parisi, Jeanine M. Gross, Alden L. Rebok, George W. |
author_facet | Kueider, Alexandra M. Parisi, Jeanine M. Gross, Alden L. Rebok, George W. |
author_sort | Kueider, Alexandra M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A systematic review to examine the efficacy of computer-based cognitive interventions for cognitively healthy older adults was conducted. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: average sample age of at least 55 years at time of training; participants did not have Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment; and the study measured cognitive outcomes as a result of training. Theoretical articles, review articles, and book chapters that did not include original data were excluded. We identified 151 studies published between 1984 and 2011, of which 38 met inclusion criteria and were further classified into three groups by the type of computerized program used: classic cognitive training tasks, neuropsychological software, and video games. Reported pre-post training effect sizes for intervention groups ranged from 0.06 to 6.32 for classic cognitive training interventions, 0.19 to 7.14 for neuropsychological software interventions, and 0.09 to 1.70 for video game interventions. Most studies reported older adults did not need to be technologically savvy in order to successfully complete or benefit from training. Overall, findings are comparable or better than those from reviews of more traditional, paper-and-pencil cognitive training approaches suggesting that computerized training is an effective, less labor intensive alternative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3394709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33947092012-07-12 Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review Kueider, Alexandra M. Parisi, Jeanine M. Gross, Alden L. Rebok, George W. PLoS One Research Article A systematic review to examine the efficacy of computer-based cognitive interventions for cognitively healthy older adults was conducted. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: average sample age of at least 55 years at time of training; participants did not have Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment; and the study measured cognitive outcomes as a result of training. Theoretical articles, review articles, and book chapters that did not include original data were excluded. We identified 151 studies published between 1984 and 2011, of which 38 met inclusion criteria and were further classified into three groups by the type of computerized program used: classic cognitive training tasks, neuropsychological software, and video games. Reported pre-post training effect sizes for intervention groups ranged from 0.06 to 6.32 for classic cognitive training interventions, 0.19 to 7.14 for neuropsychological software interventions, and 0.09 to 1.70 for video game interventions. Most studies reported older adults did not need to be technologically savvy in order to successfully complete or benefit from training. Overall, findings are comparable or better than those from reviews of more traditional, paper-and-pencil cognitive training approaches suggesting that computerized training is an effective, less labor intensive alternative. Public Library of Science 2012-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3394709/ /pubmed/22792378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588 Text en Kueider et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kueider, Alexandra M. Parisi, Jeanine M. Gross, Alden L. Rebok, George W. Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review |
title | Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22792378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040588 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kueideralexandram computerizedcognitivetrainingwitholderadultsasystematicreview AT parisijeaninem computerizedcognitivetrainingwitholderadultsasystematicreview AT grossaldenl computerizedcognitivetrainingwitholderadultsasystematicreview AT rebokgeorgew computerizedcognitivetrainingwitholderadultsasystematicreview |