Cargando…

The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming

Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiseman, Richard, Watt, Caroline, ten Brinke, Leanne, Porter, Stephen, Couper, Sara-Louise, Rankin, Calum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040259
_version_ 1782237896756953088
author Wiseman, Richard
Watt, Caroline
ten Brinke, Leanne
Porter, Stephen
Couper, Sara-Louise
Rankin, Calum
author_facet Wiseman, Richard
Watt, Caroline
ten Brinke, Leanne
Porter, Stephen
Couper, Sara-Louise
Rankin, Calum
author_sort Wiseman, Richard
collection PubMed
description Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no previous research has examined its validity. In Study 1 the eye movements of participants who were lying or telling the truth were coded, but did not match the NLP patterning. In Study 2 one group of participants were told about the NLP eye-movement hypothesis whilst a second control group were not. Both groups then undertook a lie detection test. No significant differences emerged between the two groups. Study 3 involved coding the eye movements of both liars and truth tellers taking part in high profile press conferences. Once again, no significant differences were discovered. Taken together the results of the three studies fail to support the claims of NLP. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3394779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33947792012-07-17 The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming Wiseman, Richard Watt, Caroline ten Brinke, Leanne Porter, Stephen Couper, Sara-Louise Rankin, Calum PLoS One Research Article Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no previous research has examined its validity. In Study 1 the eye movements of participants who were lying or telling the truth were coded, but did not match the NLP patterning. In Study 2 one group of participants were told about the NLP eye-movement hypothesis whilst a second control group were not. Both groups then undertook a lie detection test. No significant differences emerged between the two groups. Study 3 involved coding the eye movements of both liars and truth tellers taking part in high profile press conferences. Once again, no significant differences were discovered. Taken together the results of the three studies fail to support the claims of NLP. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. Public Library of Science 2012-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3394779/ /pubmed/22808128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040259 Text en Wiseman et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wiseman, Richard
Watt, Caroline
ten Brinke, Leanne
Porter, Stephen
Couper, Sara-Louise
Rankin, Calum
The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
title The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
title_full The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
title_fullStr The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
title_full_unstemmed The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
title_short The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
title_sort eyes don’t have it: lie detection and neuro-linguistic programming
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040259
work_keys_str_mv AT wisemanrichard theeyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT wattcaroline theeyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT tenbrinkeleanne theeyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT porterstephen theeyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT coupersaralouise theeyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT rankincalum theeyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT wisemanrichard eyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT wattcaroline eyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT tenbrinkeleanne eyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT porterstephen eyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT coupersaralouise eyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming
AT rankincalum eyesdonthaveitliedetectionandneurolinguisticprogramming