Cargando…

MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare gene copy number (GCN) and protein expression of MET and to evaluate their prognostic roles in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: MET protein expression and gene amplification (GA) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in-situ hybr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, H E, Kim, M A, Lee, H S, Jung, E-J, Yang, H-K, Lee, B L, Bang, Y-J, Kim, W H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.237
_version_ 1782237913220644864
author Lee, H E
Kim, M A
Lee, H S
Jung, E-J
Yang, H-K
Lee, B L
Bang, Y-J
Kim, W H
author_facet Lee, H E
Kim, M A
Lee, H S
Jung, E-J
Yang, H-K
Lee, B L
Bang, Y-J
Kim, W H
author_sort Lee, H E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare gene copy number (GCN) and protein expression of MET and to evaluate their prognostic roles in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: MET protein expression and gene amplification (GA) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in-situ hybridisation (SISH), respectively, in a large series of gastric carcinoma. RESULTS: Protein overexpression was observed in 104 of 438 cases, with IHC 2+ in 94 and IHC 3+ in 10, and high polysomy of chromosome 7 and GA were found in 61 and 13 of 381, respectively. Direct comparison revealed a significant correlation between high level of protein expression and increased GCN. All cases with GA showed protein overexpression. Furthermore, all with IHC 3+ showed GA except 1, even which could be categorised as GA according to the ASCO/CAP guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment. IHC 3+ and GA were significantly associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: MET IHC reflects well on GA, and therefore, it could be a primary screening test for patient selection for anti-MET therapy if GA is a major determinant of drug responsiveness. Also, the prognostic role of MET indicates that anti-MET therapy is a very promising modality in adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3394975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33949752013-07-10 MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome Lee, H E Kim, M A Lee, H S Jung, E-J Yang, H-K Lee, B L Bang, Y-J Kim, W H Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare gene copy number (GCN) and protein expression of MET and to evaluate their prognostic roles in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: MET protein expression and gene amplification (GA) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in-situ hybridisation (SISH), respectively, in a large series of gastric carcinoma. RESULTS: Protein overexpression was observed in 104 of 438 cases, with IHC 2+ in 94 and IHC 3+ in 10, and high polysomy of chromosome 7 and GA were found in 61 and 13 of 381, respectively. Direct comparison revealed a significant correlation between high level of protein expression and increased GCN. All cases with GA showed protein overexpression. Furthermore, all with IHC 3+ showed GA except 1, even which could be categorised as GA according to the ASCO/CAP guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment. IHC 3+ and GA were significantly associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: MET IHC reflects well on GA, and therefore, it could be a primary screening test for patient selection for anti-MET therapy if GA is a major determinant of drug responsiveness. Also, the prognostic role of MET indicates that anti-MET therapy is a very promising modality in adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2012-07-10 2012-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3394975/ /pubmed/22644302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.237 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Lee, H E
Kim, M A
Lee, H S
Jung, E-J
Yang, H-K
Lee, B L
Bang, Y-J
Kim, W H
MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
title MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
title_full MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
title_fullStr MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
title_full_unstemmed MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
title_short MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
title_sort met in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.237
work_keys_str_mv AT leehe metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT kimma metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT leehs metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT jungej metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT yanghk metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT leebl metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT bangyj metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome
AT kimwh metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome