Cargando…
MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare gene copy number (GCN) and protein expression of MET and to evaluate their prognostic roles in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: MET protein expression and gene amplification (GA) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in-situ hybr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.237 |
_version_ | 1782237913220644864 |
---|---|
author | Lee, H E Kim, M A Lee, H S Jung, E-J Yang, H-K Lee, B L Bang, Y-J Kim, W H |
author_facet | Lee, H E Kim, M A Lee, H S Jung, E-J Yang, H-K Lee, B L Bang, Y-J Kim, W H |
author_sort | Lee, H E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare gene copy number (GCN) and protein expression of MET and to evaluate their prognostic roles in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: MET protein expression and gene amplification (GA) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in-situ hybridisation (SISH), respectively, in a large series of gastric carcinoma. RESULTS: Protein overexpression was observed in 104 of 438 cases, with IHC 2+ in 94 and IHC 3+ in 10, and high polysomy of chromosome 7 and GA were found in 61 and 13 of 381, respectively. Direct comparison revealed a significant correlation between high level of protein expression and increased GCN. All cases with GA showed protein overexpression. Furthermore, all with IHC 3+ showed GA except 1, even which could be categorised as GA according to the ASCO/CAP guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment. IHC 3+ and GA were significantly associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: MET IHC reflects well on GA, and therefore, it could be a primary screening test for patient selection for anti-MET therapy if GA is a major determinant of drug responsiveness. Also, the prognostic role of MET indicates that anti-MET therapy is a very promising modality in adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3394975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33949752013-07-10 MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome Lee, H E Kim, M A Lee, H S Jung, E-J Yang, H-K Lee, B L Bang, Y-J Kim, W H Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare gene copy number (GCN) and protein expression of MET and to evaluate their prognostic roles in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: MET protein expression and gene amplification (GA) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in-situ hybridisation (SISH), respectively, in a large series of gastric carcinoma. RESULTS: Protein overexpression was observed in 104 of 438 cases, with IHC 2+ in 94 and IHC 3+ in 10, and high polysomy of chromosome 7 and GA were found in 61 and 13 of 381, respectively. Direct comparison revealed a significant correlation between high level of protein expression and increased GCN. All cases with GA showed protein overexpression. Furthermore, all with IHC 3+ showed GA except 1, even which could be categorised as GA according to the ASCO/CAP guideline for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assessment. IHC 3+ and GA were significantly associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: MET IHC reflects well on GA, and therefore, it could be a primary screening test for patient selection for anti-MET therapy if GA is a major determinant of drug responsiveness. Also, the prognostic role of MET indicates that anti-MET therapy is a very promising modality in adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2012-07-10 2012-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3394975/ /pubmed/22644302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.237 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics Lee, H E Kim, M A Lee, H S Jung, E-J Yang, H-K Lee, B L Bang, Y-J Kim, W H MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
title | MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
title_full | MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
title_fullStr | MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
title_short | MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
title_sort | met in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehe metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT kimma metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT leehs metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT jungej metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT yanghk metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT leebl metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT bangyj metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome AT kimwh metingastriccarcinomascomparisonbetweenproteinexpressionandgenecopynumberandimpactonclinicaloutcome |