Cargando…

The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials show reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality with faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). This outcome is now examined in a routine, population-based, screening programme. METHODS: Three biennial rounds of the UK CRC screening pilot were completed in Scotland (2000–2007)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Libby, G, Brewster, D H, McClements, P L, Carey, F A, Black, R J, Birrell, J, Fraser, C G, Steele, R J C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22735907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.277
_version_ 1782237917071015936
author Libby, G
Brewster, D H
McClements, P L
Carey, F A
Black, R J
Birrell, J
Fraser, C G
Steele, R J C
author_facet Libby, G
Brewster, D H
McClements, P L
Carey, F A
Black, R J
Birrell, J
Fraser, C G
Steele, R J C
author_sort Libby, G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised trials show reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality with faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). This outcome is now examined in a routine, population-based, screening programme. METHODS: Three biennial rounds of the UK CRC screening pilot were completed in Scotland (2000–2007) before the roll out of a national programme. All residents (50–69 years) in the three pilot Health Boards were invited for screening. They received a FOBT test by post to complete at home and return for analysis. Positive tests were followed up with colonoscopy. Controls, selected from non-pilot Health Boards, were matched by age, gender, and deprivation and assigned the invitation date of matched invitee. Follow-up was from invitation date to 31 December 2009 or date of death if earlier. RESULTS: There were 379 655 people in each group (median age 55.6 years, 51.6% male). Participation was 60.6%. There were 961 (0.25%) CRC deaths in invitees, 1056 (0.28%) in controls, rate ratio (RR) 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.99) overall and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.82) for participants. Non-participants had increased CRC mortality compared with controls, RR 1.21 (95% CI 1.06–1.38). CONCLUSION: There was a 10% relative reduction in CRC mortality in a routine screening programme, rising to 27% in participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3394992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33949922013-04-17 The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study Libby, G Brewster, D H McClements, P L Carey, F A Black, R J Birrell, J Fraser, C G Steele, R J C Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Randomised trials show reduced colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality with faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). This outcome is now examined in a routine, population-based, screening programme. METHODS: Three biennial rounds of the UK CRC screening pilot were completed in Scotland (2000–2007) before the roll out of a national programme. All residents (50–69 years) in the three pilot Health Boards were invited for screening. They received a FOBT test by post to complete at home and return for analysis. Positive tests were followed up with colonoscopy. Controls, selected from non-pilot Health Boards, were matched by age, gender, and deprivation and assigned the invitation date of matched invitee. Follow-up was from invitation date to 31 December 2009 or date of death if earlier. RESULTS: There were 379 655 people in each group (median age 55.6 years, 51.6% male). Participation was 60.6%. There were 961 (0.25%) CRC deaths in invitees, 1056 (0.28%) in controls, rate ratio (RR) 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–0.99) overall and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.82) for participants. Non-participants had increased CRC mortality compared with controls, RR 1.21 (95% CI 1.06–1.38). CONCLUSION: There was a 10% relative reduction in CRC mortality in a routine screening programme, rising to 27% in participants. Nature Publishing Group 2012-07-10 2012-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3394992/ /pubmed/22735907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.277 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Libby, G
Brewster, D H
McClements, P L
Carey, F A
Black, R J
Birrell, J
Fraser, C G
Steele, R J C
The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
title The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
title_full The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
title_fullStr The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
title_short The impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
title_sort impact of population-based faecal occult blood test screening on colorectal cancer mortality: a matched cohort study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22735907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.277
work_keys_str_mv AT libbyg theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT brewsterdh theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT mcclementspl theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT careyfa theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT blackrj theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT birrellj theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT frasercg theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT steelerjc theimpactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT libbyg impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT brewsterdh impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT mcclementspl impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT careyfa impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT blackrj impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT birrellj impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT frasercg impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy
AT steelerjc impactofpopulationbasedfaecaloccultbloodtestscreeningoncolorectalcancermortalityamatchedcohortstudy