Cargando…

Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis

BACKGROUND: Providing health care services in Africa is hampered by severe scarcity of personnel, medical supplies and financial funds. Consequently, managers of health care institutions are called to measure and improve the efficiency of their facilities in order to provide the best possible servic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marschall, Paul, Flessa, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-5
_version_ 1782237927836745728
author Marschall, Paul
Flessa, Steffen
author_facet Marschall, Paul
Flessa, Steffen
author_sort Marschall, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providing health care services in Africa is hampered by severe scarcity of personnel, medical supplies and financial funds. Consequently, managers of health care institutions are called to measure and improve the efficiency of their facilities in order to provide the best possible services with their resources. However, very little is known about the efficiency of health care facilities in Africa and instruments of performance measurement are hardly applied in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study determines the relative efficiency of primary care facilities in Nouna, a rural health district in Burkina Faso. Furthermore, it analyses the factors influencing the efficiency of these institutions. METHODOLOGY: We apply a two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) based on data from a comprehensive provider and household information system. In the first stage, the relative efficiency of each institution is calculated by a traditional DEA model. In the second stage, we identify the reasons for being inefficient by regression technique. RESULTS: The DEA projections suggest that inefficiency is mainly a result of poor utilization of health care facilities as they were either too big or the demand was too low. Regression results showed that distance is an important factor influencing the efficiency of a health care institution CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the findings of existing one-stage DEA analyses of health facilities in Africa, the share of relatively efficient units is slightly higher. The difference might be explained by a rather homogenous structure of the primary care facilities in the Burkina Faso sample. The study also indicates that improving the accessibility of primary care facilities will have a major impact on the efficiency of these institutions. Thus, health decision-makers are called to overcome the demand-side barriers in accessing health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3395044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33950442012-07-16 Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis Marschall, Paul Flessa, Steffen Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: Providing health care services in Africa is hampered by severe scarcity of personnel, medical supplies and financial funds. Consequently, managers of health care institutions are called to measure and improve the efficiency of their facilities in order to provide the best possible services with their resources. However, very little is known about the efficiency of health care facilities in Africa and instruments of performance measurement are hardly applied in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study determines the relative efficiency of primary care facilities in Nouna, a rural health district in Burkina Faso. Furthermore, it analyses the factors influencing the efficiency of these institutions. METHODOLOGY: We apply a two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) based on data from a comprehensive provider and household information system. In the first stage, the relative efficiency of each institution is calculated by a traditional DEA model. In the second stage, we identify the reasons for being inefficient by regression technique. RESULTS: The DEA projections suggest that inefficiency is mainly a result of poor utilization of health care facilities as they were either too big or the demand was too low. Regression results showed that distance is an important factor influencing the efficiency of a health care institution CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the findings of existing one-stage DEA analyses of health facilities in Africa, the share of relatively efficient units is slightly higher. The difference might be explained by a rather homogenous structure of the primary care facilities in the Burkina Faso sample. The study also indicates that improving the accessibility of primary care facilities will have a major impact on the efficiency of these institutions. Thus, health decision-makers are called to overcome the demand-side barriers in accessing health care. Springer 2011-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3395044/ /pubmed/22828358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-5 Text en Copyright ©2011 Marschall and Flessa; licensee Springer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Marschall, Paul
Flessa, Steffen
Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
title Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
title_full Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
title_fullStr Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
title_short Efficiency of primary care in rural Burkina Faso. A two-stage DEA analysis
title_sort efficiency of primary care in rural burkina faso. a two-stage dea analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-1-5
work_keys_str_mv AT marschallpaul efficiencyofprimarycareinruralburkinafasoatwostagedeaanalysis
AT flessasteffen efficiencyofprimarycareinruralburkinafasoatwostagedeaanalysis