Cargando…

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: Adenosine receptor stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) may cause A(2B) and/or A(3) receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction, of particular concern to physicians testing patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A Phase 4, randomized, dou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prenner, Bruce M., Bukofzer, Stan, Behm, Sarah, Feaheny, Kathleen, McNutt, Bruce E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22484721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9547-4
_version_ 1782237971166003200
author Prenner, Bruce M.
Bukofzer, Stan
Behm, Sarah
Feaheny, Kathleen
McNutt, Bruce E.
author_facet Prenner, Bruce M.
Bukofzer, Stan
Behm, Sarah
Feaheny, Kathleen
McNutt, Bruce E.
author_sort Prenner, Bruce M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adenosine receptor stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) may cause A(2B) and/or A(3) receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction, of particular concern to physicians testing patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A Phase 4, randomized, double-blind study (NCT00862641) assessed the safety of the selective A(2A) receptor agonist, regadenoson, compared with placebo in subjects with asthma or COPD who represented likely candidates for MPI. RESULTS: Overall, 356 and 176 subjects with asthma and 316 and 151 subjects with COPD received regadenoson and placebo, respectively. The percentage of subjects experiencing a >15% decrease in FEV(1) from baseline to any assessment up to 24 hours post-baseline was not statistically significantly different between the regadenoson and the placebo groups in the asthma or COPD stratum. Dyspnea, the most frequent respiratory adverse event, occurred with higher incidence (P < .0001) in the regadenoson group than the placebo group in the asthma (10.7% vs 1.1%) and COPD (18.0% vs 2.6%) strata. No subjects experienced severe bronchoconstriction, although the occurrence of such reactions with adenosine receptor agonists cannot be ruled out, such that caution is advised. CONCLUSIONS: This information may be helpful to physicians selecting a pharmacologic stress agent for MPI in patients with asthma or COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3395344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33953442013-01-02 A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Prenner, Bruce M. Bukofzer, Stan Behm, Sarah Feaheny, Kathleen McNutt, Bruce E. J Nucl Cardiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Adenosine receptor stress agents for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) may cause A(2B) and/or A(3) receptor-mediated bronchoconstriction, of particular concern to physicians testing patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A Phase 4, randomized, double-blind study (NCT00862641) assessed the safety of the selective A(2A) receptor agonist, regadenoson, compared with placebo in subjects with asthma or COPD who represented likely candidates for MPI. RESULTS: Overall, 356 and 176 subjects with asthma and 316 and 151 subjects with COPD received regadenoson and placebo, respectively. The percentage of subjects experiencing a >15% decrease in FEV(1) from baseline to any assessment up to 24 hours post-baseline was not statistically significantly different between the regadenoson and the placebo groups in the asthma or COPD stratum. Dyspnea, the most frequent respiratory adverse event, occurred with higher incidence (P < .0001) in the regadenoson group than the placebo group in the asthma (10.7% vs 1.1%) and COPD (18.0% vs 2.6%) strata. No subjects experienced severe bronchoconstriction, although the occurrence of such reactions with adenosine receptor agonists cannot be ruled out, such that caution is advised. CONCLUSIONS: This information may be helpful to physicians selecting a pharmacologic stress agent for MPI in patients with asthma or COPD. Springer-Verlag 2012-04-07 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3395344/ /pubmed/22484721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9547-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prenner, Bruce M.
Bukofzer, Stan
Behm, Sarah
Feaheny, Kathleen
McNutt, Bruce E.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_fullStr A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_short A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_sort randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the safety and tolerability of regadenoson in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22484721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9547-4
work_keys_str_mv AT prennerbrucem arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT bukofzerstan arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT behmsarah arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT feahenykathleen arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT mcnuttbrucee arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT prennerbrucem randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT bukofzerstan randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT behmsarah randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT feahenykathleen randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT mcnuttbrucee randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudyassessingthesafetyandtolerabilityofregadenosoninsubjectswithasthmaorchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease