Cargando…

Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to limit exposure to ionizing radiation and fully characterize three dimensional changes in the spine of patients with scoliosis reliable non-invasive methods of spinal back contour analysis (Milwaukee Topographic Scanner) (MTS) have been developed. STUDY DESIGN: The current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rankine, Leah, Liu, Xue C, Tassone, Channing, Lyon, Roger, Tarima, Sergey, Thometz, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802917
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010226
_version_ 1782238052595269632
author Rankine, Leah
Liu, Xue C
Tassone, Channing
Lyon, Roger
Tarima, Sergey
Thometz, John
author_facet Rankine, Leah
Liu, Xue C
Tassone, Channing
Lyon, Roger
Tarima, Sergey
Thometz, John
author_sort Rankine, Leah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In an effort to limit exposure to ionizing radiation and fully characterize three dimensional changes in the spine of patients with scoliosis reliable non-invasive methods of spinal back contour analysis (Milwaukee Topographic Scanner) (MTS) have been developed. STUDY DESIGN: The current study compares spinal topography measurements among different subject positions and evaluates the reproducibility of the system for both inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. METHODS: A dummy cast (plastic cast) of one patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was created in order to test the reliability of the MTS. The dummy cast was positioned and rotated in 3D while scanned by two investigators using the MTS. A total of twelve parameters including Q-angle (an analog to X-ray’s Cobb angle) were extracted. RESULTS: All measurements of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.99) with the exception of Pelvic Tilt (intra-rater ICC is 0.61) and lordosis angle (inter-rater ICC is 0.82). No significant variability among investigators was observed for all tested metrics. No significant variability due to position was observed for the majority of back contour measurements but there were significant changes in the T1-S1 angle, T1-S1 deviation, T1-NC angle, T1-NC deviation, and Back Height metric (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The MTS is a reliable method of raster stereography in the measurement of the back contour, which will help monitor the progression of children with idiopathic scoliosis and reduce the use of X-rays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3395880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33958802012-07-16 Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis Rankine, Leah Liu, Xue C Tassone, Channing Lyon, Roger Tarima, Sergey Thometz, John Open Orthop J Article OBJECTIVE: In an effort to limit exposure to ionizing radiation and fully characterize three dimensional changes in the spine of patients with scoliosis reliable non-invasive methods of spinal back contour analysis (Milwaukee Topographic Scanner) (MTS) have been developed. STUDY DESIGN: The current study compares spinal topography measurements among different subject positions and evaluates the reproducibility of the system for both inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. METHODS: A dummy cast (plastic cast) of one patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was created in order to test the reliability of the MTS. The dummy cast was positioned and rotated in 3D while scanned by two investigators using the MTS. A total of twelve parameters including Q-angle (an analog to X-ray’s Cobb angle) were extracted. RESULTS: All measurements of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.99) with the exception of Pelvic Tilt (intra-rater ICC is 0.61) and lordosis angle (inter-rater ICC is 0.82). No significant variability among investigators was observed for all tested metrics. No significant variability due to position was observed for the majority of back contour measurements but there were significant changes in the T1-S1 angle, T1-S1 deviation, T1-NC angle, T1-NC deviation, and Back Height metric (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The MTS is a reliable method of raster stereography in the measurement of the back contour, which will help monitor the progression of children with idiopathic scoliosis and reduce the use of X-rays. Bentham Open 2012-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3395880/ /pubmed/22802917 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010226 Text en © Rankine et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Rankine, Leah
Liu, Xue C
Tassone, Channing
Lyon, Roger
Tarima, Sergey
Thometz, John
Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis
title Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis
title_full Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis
title_short Reproducibility of Newly Developed Spinal Topography Measurements for Scoliosis
title_sort reproducibility of newly developed spinal topography measurements for scoliosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3395880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802917
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010226
work_keys_str_mv AT rankineleah reproducibilityofnewlydevelopedspinaltopographymeasurementsforscoliosis
AT liuxuec reproducibilityofnewlydevelopedspinaltopographymeasurementsforscoliosis
AT tassonechanning reproducibilityofnewlydevelopedspinaltopographymeasurementsforscoliosis
AT lyonroger reproducibilityofnewlydevelopedspinaltopographymeasurementsforscoliosis
AT tarimasergey reproducibilityofnewlydevelopedspinaltopographymeasurementsforscoliosis
AT thometzjohn reproducibilityofnewlydevelopedspinaltopographymeasurementsforscoliosis