Cargando…

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party

Following the failure of PROWESS-SHOCK to demonstrate efficacy, Eli Lilly and Company withdrew drotrecogin alfa (activated) from the worldwide market. Drotrecogin was initially approved after the original trial, PROWESS, was stopped early for overwhelming efficacy. These events prompt consideration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Angus, Derek C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22309988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11152
_version_ 1782238086840713216
author Angus, Derek C
author_facet Angus, Derek C
author_sort Angus, Derek C
collection PubMed
description Following the failure of PROWESS-SHOCK to demonstrate efficacy, Eli Lilly and Company withdrew drotrecogin alfa (activated) from the worldwide market. Drotrecogin was initially approved after the original trial, PROWESS, was stopped early for overwhelming efficacy. These events prompt consideration of both the initial approval decision and the later decision to withdraw. It is regrettable that the initial decision was made largely on a single trial that was stopped early. However, the decision to approve was within the bounds of normal regulatory practice and was made by many approval bodies around the world. Furthermore, the overall withdrawal rate of approved drugs remains very low. The decision to withdraw was a voluntary decision by Eli Lilly and Company and likely reflected key business considerations. Drotrecogin does have important biologic effects, and it is probable that we do not know how best to select patients who would benefit. Overall, there may still be a small advantage to drotrecogin alfa, even used non-selectively, but the costs of determining such an effect with adequate certainty are likely prohibitive, and the point is now moot. In the future, we should consider ways to make clinical trials easier and quicker so that more information can be available in a timely manner when considering regulatory approval. At the same time, more sophisticated selection of patients seems key if we are to most wisely test agents designed to manipulate the septic host response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3396243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33962432013-02-06 Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party Angus, Derek C Crit Care Commentary Following the failure of PROWESS-SHOCK to demonstrate efficacy, Eli Lilly and Company withdrew drotrecogin alfa (activated) from the worldwide market. Drotrecogin was initially approved after the original trial, PROWESS, was stopped early for overwhelming efficacy. These events prompt consideration of both the initial approval decision and the later decision to withdraw. It is regrettable that the initial decision was made largely on a single trial that was stopped early. However, the decision to approve was within the bounds of normal regulatory practice and was made by many approval bodies around the world. Furthermore, the overall withdrawal rate of approved drugs remains very low. The decision to withdraw was a voluntary decision by Eli Lilly and Company and likely reflected key business considerations. Drotrecogin does have important biologic effects, and it is probable that we do not know how best to select patients who would benefit. Overall, there may still be a small advantage to drotrecogin alfa, even used non-selectively, but the costs of determining such an effect with adequate certainty are likely prohibitive, and the point is now moot. In the future, we should consider ways to make clinical trials easier and quicker so that more information can be available in a timely manner when considering regulatory approval. At the same time, more sophisticated selection of patients seems key if we are to most wisely test agents designed to manipulate the septic host response. BioMed Central 2012 2012-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3396243/ /pubmed/22309988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11152 Text en Copyright ©2012 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Angus, Derek C
Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
title Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
title_full Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
title_fullStr Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
title_full_unstemmed Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
title_short Drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
title_sort drotrecogin alfa (activated) ... a sad final fizzle to a roller-coaster party
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22309988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11152
work_keys_str_mv AT angusderekc drotrecoginalfaactivatedasadfinalfizzletoarollercoasterparty