Cargando…

A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System

INTRODUCTION: The Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) is used to treat patients with liver failure. Observational data suggest that citrate anticoagulation during MARS is feasible. Comparative studies on the optimal anticoagulation regimen during MARS are lacking. The aim of the current stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meijers, Björn, Laleman, Wim, Vermeersch, Pieter, Nevens, Frederik, Wilmer, Alexander, Evenepoel, Pieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22305273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11180
_version_ 1782238090761338880
author Meijers, Björn
Laleman, Wim
Vermeersch, Pieter
Nevens, Frederik
Wilmer, Alexander
Evenepoel, Pieter
author_facet Meijers, Björn
Laleman, Wim
Vermeersch, Pieter
Nevens, Frederik
Wilmer, Alexander
Evenepoel, Pieter
author_sort Meijers, Björn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) is used to treat patients with liver failure. Observational data suggest that citrate anticoagulation during MARS is feasible. Comparative studies on the optimal anticoagulation regimen during MARS are lacking. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two heparin-free anticoagulation regimens. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized open-label crossover study of regional citrate anticoagulation against no anticoagulation. Ten patients (age 55 ± 11 years) with liver failure undergoing MARS treatment were included. The primary endpoint was completion of MARS sessions. Secondary endpoints included treatment efficacy and safety. Longevity of MARS treatment was plotted as a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Fisher's exact test was used for contingency table analysis. RESULTS: Of a total of 27 6-hour sessions, four sessions had to be terminated prematurely, three due to occlusive clotting of the extracorporeal circuit and one due to uncontrollable bleeding from the vascular access site. All four events occurred in the group without anticoagulation. Between group comparison demonstrated citrate anticoagulation to significantly increase the likelihood of completed MARS treatment (Fisher's exact test, P 0.04). This translates into higher bilirubin reduction ratios when citrate was applied (reduction ratio 0.25 vs. 0.15, P 0.02). Systemic ionized calcium concentrations were significantly reduced during citrate anticoagulation (P < 0.001) but remained within a safe range. We observed no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with liver failure is feasible. Citrate anticoagulation provides superior patency of the extracorporeal circuit. Avoidance of anticoagulation during MARS results in significant loss of treatment efficacy, due to treatment downtime. Additional studies are required to identify the optimal anticoagulation regimen for extracorporeal circulation in patients with liver failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3396260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33962602012-07-13 A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System Meijers, Björn Laleman, Wim Vermeersch, Pieter Nevens, Frederik Wilmer, Alexander Evenepoel, Pieter Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) is used to treat patients with liver failure. Observational data suggest that citrate anticoagulation during MARS is feasible. Comparative studies on the optimal anticoagulation regimen during MARS are lacking. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two heparin-free anticoagulation regimens. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized open-label crossover study of regional citrate anticoagulation against no anticoagulation. Ten patients (age 55 ± 11 years) with liver failure undergoing MARS treatment were included. The primary endpoint was completion of MARS sessions. Secondary endpoints included treatment efficacy and safety. Longevity of MARS treatment was plotted as a Kaplan-Meier estimate. Fisher's exact test was used for contingency table analysis. RESULTS: Of a total of 27 6-hour sessions, four sessions had to be terminated prematurely, three due to occlusive clotting of the extracorporeal circuit and one due to uncontrollable bleeding from the vascular access site. All four events occurred in the group without anticoagulation. Between group comparison demonstrated citrate anticoagulation to significantly increase the likelihood of completed MARS treatment (Fisher's exact test, P 0.04). This translates into higher bilirubin reduction ratios when citrate was applied (reduction ratio 0.25 vs. 0.15, P 0.02). Systemic ionized calcium concentrations were significantly reduced during citrate anticoagulation (P < 0.001) but remained within a safe range. We observed no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with liver failure is feasible. Citrate anticoagulation provides superior patency of the extracorporeal circuit. Avoidance of anticoagulation during MARS results in significant loss of treatment efficacy, due to treatment downtime. Additional studies are required to identify the optimal anticoagulation regimen for extracorporeal circulation in patients with liver failure. BioMed Central 2012 2012-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3396260/ /pubmed/22305273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11180 Text en Copyright ©2012 Meijers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Meijers, Björn
Laleman, Wim
Vermeersch, Pieter
Nevens, Frederik
Wilmer, Alexander
Evenepoel, Pieter
A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System
title A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System
title_full A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System
title_fullStr A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System
title_short A prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System
title_sort prospective randomized open-label crossover trial of regional citrate anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation free liver dialysis by the molecular adsorbents recirculating system
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22305273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc11180
work_keys_str_mv AT meijersbjorn aprospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT lalemanwim aprospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT vermeerschpieter aprospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT nevensfrederik aprospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT wilmeralexander aprospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT evenepoelpieter aprospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT meijersbjorn prospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT lalemanwim prospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT vermeerschpieter prospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT nevensfrederik prospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT wilmeralexander prospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem
AT evenepoelpieter prospectiverandomizedopenlabelcrossovertrialofregionalcitrateanticoagulationvsanticoagulationfreeliverdialysisbythemolecularadsorbentsrecirculatingsystem