Cargando…

The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis

BACKGROUND: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has been shown to have no influence on the incidence of anastomotic leakage in overall colorectal surgery. The role of MBP in elective surgery in combination with an inflammatory component such as diverticulitis is yet unclear. This study evaluates the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van’t Sant, H. P., Slieker, J. C., Hop, W. C. J., Weidema, W. F., Lange, J. F., Vermeulen, J., Contant, C. M. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22706733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0852-3
_version_ 1782238258469535744
author van’t Sant, H. P.
Slieker, J. C.
Hop, W. C. J.
Weidema, W. F.
Lange, J. F.
Vermeulen, J.
Contant, C. M. E.
author_facet van’t Sant, H. P.
Slieker, J. C.
Hop, W. C. J.
Weidema, W. F.
Lange, J. F.
Vermeulen, J.
Contant, C. M. E.
author_sort van’t Sant, H. P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has been shown to have no influence on the incidence of anastomotic leakage in overall colorectal surgery. The role of MBP in elective surgery in combination with an inflammatory component such as diverticulitis is yet unclear. This study evaluates the effects of MBP on anastomotic leakage and other septic complications in 190 patients who underwent elective surgery for colonic diverticulitis. METHODS: A subgroup analysis was performed in a prior multicenter (13 hospitals) randomized trial comparing clinical outcome of MBP versus no MBP in elective colorectal surgery. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in patients operated on for diverticulitis, and secondary endpoints were septic complications and mortality. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1,354 patients, 190 underwent elective colorectal surgery (resection with primary anastomosis) for (recurrent or stenotic) diverticulitis. One hundred and three patients underwent MBP prior to surgery and 87 did not. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7.8 % of patients treated with MBP and in 5.7 % of patients not treated with MBP (p = 0.79). There were no significant differences between the groups in septic complications and mortality. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation has no influence on the incidence of anastomotic leakage, or other septic complications, and may be safely omitted in case of elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33982492012-07-23 The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis van’t Sant, H. P. Slieker, J. C. Hop, W. C. J. Weidema, W. F. Lange, J. F. Vermeulen, J. Contant, C. M. E. Tech Coloproctol Original Article BACKGROUND: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) has been shown to have no influence on the incidence of anastomotic leakage in overall colorectal surgery. The role of MBP in elective surgery in combination with an inflammatory component such as diverticulitis is yet unclear. This study evaluates the effects of MBP on anastomotic leakage and other septic complications in 190 patients who underwent elective surgery for colonic diverticulitis. METHODS: A subgroup analysis was performed in a prior multicenter (13 hospitals) randomized trial comparing clinical outcome of MBP versus no MBP in elective colorectal surgery. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in patients operated on for diverticulitis, and secondary endpoints were septic complications and mortality. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1,354 patients, 190 underwent elective colorectal surgery (resection with primary anastomosis) for (recurrent or stenotic) diverticulitis. One hundred and three patients underwent MBP prior to surgery and 87 did not. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7.8 % of patients treated with MBP and in 5.7 % of patients not treated with MBP (p = 0.79). There were no significant differences between the groups in septic complications and mortality. CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation has no influence on the incidence of anastomotic leakage, or other septic complications, and may be safely omitted in case of elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis. Springer Milan 2012-06-16 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3398249/ /pubmed/22706733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0852-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
van’t Sant, H. P.
Slieker, J. C.
Hop, W. C. J.
Weidema, W. F.
Lange, J. F.
Vermeulen, J.
Contant, C. M. E.
The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
title The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
title_full The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
title_fullStr The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
title_full_unstemmed The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
title_short The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
title_sort influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22706733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0852-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vantsanthp theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT sliekerjc theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT hopwcj theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT weidemawf theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT langejf theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT vermeulenj theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT contantcme theinfluenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT vantsanthp influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT sliekerjc influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT hopwcj influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT weidemawf influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT langejf influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT vermeulenj influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis
AT contantcme influenceofmechanicalbowelpreparationinelectivecolorectalsurgeryfordiverticulitis