Cargando…

Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey

BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish levels of consumer involvement in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses and other studies carried out by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit across the range of research programs, predominantly in cancer and HIV. METHODS: Staff re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vale, Claire L, Thompson, Lindsay C, Murphy, Claire, Forcat, Silvia, Hanley, Bec
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22243649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-9
_version_ 1782238261841756160
author Vale, Claire L
Thompson, Lindsay C
Murphy, Claire
Forcat, Silvia
Hanley, Bec
author_facet Vale, Claire L
Thompson, Lindsay C
Murphy, Claire
Forcat, Silvia
Hanley, Bec
author_sort Vale, Claire L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish levels of consumer involvement in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses and other studies carried out by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit across the range of research programs, predominantly in cancer and HIV. METHODS: Staff responsible for studies that were included in a Unit Progress Report (MRC CTU, April 2009) were asked to complete a semi-structured questionnaire survey regarding consumer involvement. This was defined as active involvement of consumers as partners in the research process and not as subjects of that research. The electronic questionnaires combined open and closed questions, intended to capture quantitative and qualitative information on whether studies had involved consumers; types of activities undertaken; recruitment and support; advantages and disadvantages of involvement and its perceived impact on aspects of the research. RESULTS: Between October 2009 and April 2010, 138 completed questionnaires (86%) were returned. Studies had been conducted over a 20 year period from 1989, and around half were in cancer; 30% in HIV and 20% were in other disease areas including arthritis, tuberculosis and blood transfusion medicine. Forty-three studies (31%) had some consumer involvement, most commonly as members of trial management groups (TMG) [88%]. A number of positive impacts on both the research and the researcher were identified. Researchers generally felt involvement was worthwhile and some felt that consumer involvement had improved the credibility of the research. Benefits in design and quality, trial recruitment, dissemination and decision making were also perceived. Researchers felt they learned from consumer involvement, albeit that there were some barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst most researchers identified benefits of involving consumers, most of studies included in the survey had no involvement. Information from this survey will inform the development of a unit policy on consumer involvement, to guide future research conducted within the MRC Clinical Trials Unit and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33982652012-07-18 Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey Vale, Claire L Thompson, Lindsay C Murphy, Claire Forcat, Silvia Hanley, Bec Trials Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to establish levels of consumer involvement in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses and other studies carried out by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit across the range of research programs, predominantly in cancer and HIV. METHODS: Staff responsible for studies that were included in a Unit Progress Report (MRC CTU, April 2009) were asked to complete a semi-structured questionnaire survey regarding consumer involvement. This was defined as active involvement of consumers as partners in the research process and not as subjects of that research. The electronic questionnaires combined open and closed questions, intended to capture quantitative and qualitative information on whether studies had involved consumers; types of activities undertaken; recruitment and support; advantages and disadvantages of involvement and its perceived impact on aspects of the research. RESULTS: Between October 2009 and April 2010, 138 completed questionnaires (86%) were returned. Studies had been conducted over a 20 year period from 1989, and around half were in cancer; 30% in HIV and 20% were in other disease areas including arthritis, tuberculosis and blood transfusion medicine. Forty-three studies (31%) had some consumer involvement, most commonly as members of trial management groups (TMG) [88%]. A number of positive impacts on both the research and the researcher were identified. Researchers generally felt involvement was worthwhile and some felt that consumer involvement had improved the credibility of the research. Benefits in design and quality, trial recruitment, dissemination and decision making were also perceived. Researchers felt they learned from consumer involvement, albeit that there were some barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst most researchers identified benefits of involving consumers, most of studies included in the survey had no involvement. Information from this survey will inform the development of a unit policy on consumer involvement, to guide future research conducted within the MRC Clinical Trials Unit and beyond. BioMed Central 2012-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3398265/ /pubmed/22243649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-9 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vale et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Vale, Claire L
Thompson, Lindsay C
Murphy, Claire
Forcat, Silvia
Hanley, Bec
Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey
title Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey
title_full Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey
title_fullStr Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey
title_full_unstemmed Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey
title_short Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey
title_sort involvement of consumers in studies run by the medical research council clinical trials unit: results of a survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22243649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-9
work_keys_str_mv AT valeclairel involvementofconsumersinstudiesrunbythemedicalresearchcouncilclinicaltrialsunitresultsofasurvey
AT thompsonlindsayc involvementofconsumersinstudiesrunbythemedicalresearchcouncilclinicaltrialsunitresultsofasurvey
AT murphyclaire involvementofconsumersinstudiesrunbythemedicalresearchcouncilclinicaltrialsunitresultsofasurvey
AT forcatsilvia involvementofconsumersinstudiesrunbythemedicalresearchcouncilclinicaltrialsunitresultsofasurvey
AT hanleybec involvementofconsumersinstudiesrunbythemedicalresearchcouncilclinicaltrialsunitresultsofasurvey