Cargando…
The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Black individuals are far more likely than white individuals to develop end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported to be less prevalent among blacks. This disparity remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-4 |
_version_ | 1782238267985362944 |
---|---|
author | Arora, Pradeep Rajagopalan, Srini Patel, Nilang Nainani, Neha Venuto, Rocco C Lohr, James W |
author_facet | Arora, Pradeep Rajagopalan, Srini Patel, Nilang Nainani, Neha Venuto, Rocco C Lohr, James W |
author_sort | Arora, Pradeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Black individuals are far more likely than white individuals to develop end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported to be less prevalent among blacks. This disparity remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the lower prevalence of CKD among blacks in early stages of CKD might be due in part to an inability of the MDRD equation to accurately determine early stages of CKD in both the black and white population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 97, 451 patients seen in primary care clinic in Veterans Integrated Service Network 2 (VISN 2) over a 7 year period to determine the prevalence of CKD using both the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation and the more recently developed CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Demographic data, comorbid conditions, prescription of medications, and laboratory data were recorded. Logistic regression and quantile regression models were used to compare the prevalence of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) categories between black and white individuals. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CKD was lower when the CKD-EPI equation was used. Prevalence of CKD in whites was 53.2% by MDRD and 48.4% by CKD-EPI, versus 34.1% by MDRD and 34.5% by CKD-EPI in blacks. The cumulative logistic regression and quantile regression showed that when eGFR was calculated by the EPI method, blacks were as likely to present with an eGFR value less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2 )as whites. Using the CKD-EPI equation, blacks were more likely than white individuals to have stage 3b, 4 and 5 CKD. Using the MDRD method, the prevalence in blacks was only higher than in whites for stage 4 and 5 CKD. Similar results were obtained when the analysis was confined to patients over 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The MDRD equation overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites and underestimates the prevalence of CKD in blacks compared to the CKD-EPI equation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3398292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33982922012-07-18 The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study Arora, Pradeep Rajagopalan, Srini Patel, Nilang Nainani, Neha Venuto, Rocco C Lohr, James W BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Black individuals are far more likely than white individuals to develop end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported to be less prevalent among blacks. This disparity remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the lower prevalence of CKD among blacks in early stages of CKD might be due in part to an inability of the MDRD equation to accurately determine early stages of CKD in both the black and white population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 97, 451 patients seen in primary care clinic in Veterans Integrated Service Network 2 (VISN 2) over a 7 year period to determine the prevalence of CKD using both the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation and the more recently developed CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Demographic data, comorbid conditions, prescription of medications, and laboratory data were recorded. Logistic regression and quantile regression models were used to compare the prevalence of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) categories between black and white individuals. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CKD was lower when the CKD-EPI equation was used. Prevalence of CKD in whites was 53.2% by MDRD and 48.4% by CKD-EPI, versus 34.1% by MDRD and 34.5% by CKD-EPI in blacks. The cumulative logistic regression and quantile regression showed that when eGFR was calculated by the EPI method, blacks were as likely to present with an eGFR value less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2 )as whites. Using the CKD-EPI equation, blacks were more likely than white individuals to have stage 3b, 4 and 5 CKD. Using the MDRD method, the prevalence in blacks was only higher than in whites for stage 4 and 5 CKD. Similar results were obtained when the analysis was confined to patients over 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The MDRD equation overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites and underestimates the prevalence of CKD in blacks compared to the CKD-EPI equation. BioMed Central 2012-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3398292/ /pubmed/22264268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-4 Text en Copyright ©2012 Arora et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Arora, Pradeep Rajagopalan, Srini Patel, Nilang Nainani, Neha Venuto, Rocco C Lohr, James W The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study |
title | The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | The MDRD equation underestimates the prevalence of CKD among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of CKD among whites compared to the CKD-EPI equation: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | mdrd equation underestimates the prevalence of ckd among blacks and overestimates the prevalence of ckd among whites compared to the ckd-epi equation: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22264268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arorapradeep themdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT rajagopalansrini themdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT patelnilang themdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT nainanineha themdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT venutoroccoc themdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lohrjamesw themdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT arorapradeep mdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT rajagopalansrini mdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT patelnilang mdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT nainanineha mdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT venutoroccoc mdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lohrjamesw mdrdequationunderestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongblacksandoverestimatestheprevalenceofckdamongwhitescomparedtotheckdepiequationaretrospectivecohortstudy |