Cargando…
Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
BACKGROUND: Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-51 |
_version_ | 1782238325989441536 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Bo Liu, Yanping Zhang, Yifei Chen, Yuhong Yang, Zhifang Zhu, Ying Zhan, Weiwei |
author_facet | Zhao, Bo Liu, Yanping Zhang, Yifei Chen, Yuhong Yang, Zhifang Zhu, Ying Zhan, Weiwei |
author_sort | Zhao, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed CIMT in T2DM patients over a 4-year follow-up period. METHODS: 355 T2DM patients (mean age 59 years; 54.9% women) were included in the present study. CIMT were measured using Color Doppler ultrasound. CIMT was measured at baseline (CIMT) in 2006 and at follow-up in 2010. Biochemical and clinical measurements were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Mean value of CIMT1 and CIMT2 were 0.740 ± 0.148 mm and 0.842 ± 0.179 mm, respectively. Men had higher CIMT than women both at baseline and at follow-up (CIMT1: 0.762 ± 0.149 vs 0.723 ± 0.146 mm, P = 0.0149; CIMT2: 0.880 ± 0.189 vs 0.810 ± 0.164 mm, P = 0.0002). Mean annual progression of CIMT (dCIMT) was 0.025 ± 0.022 mm/year. dCIMT was larger in men than in women (0.030 ± 0.025 vs 0.022 ± 0.019 mm, P = 0.0006). In multiple regression analyses, age was an independent risk factor of CIMT in both genders, while dCIMT was associated with age only in men. CONCLUSIONS: Gender difference in CIMT was confirmed in T2DM patients. Moreover, impact of ageing on CIMT progression only existed in men, which might be the reason that gender difference in CIMT increased with age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3398844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33988442012-07-18 Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study Zhao, Bo Liu, Yanping Zhang, Yifei Chen, Yuhong Yang, Zhifang Zhu, Ying Zhan, Weiwei Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed CIMT in T2DM patients over a 4-year follow-up period. METHODS: 355 T2DM patients (mean age 59 years; 54.9% women) were included in the present study. CIMT were measured using Color Doppler ultrasound. CIMT was measured at baseline (CIMT) in 2006 and at follow-up in 2010. Biochemical and clinical measurements were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Mean value of CIMT1 and CIMT2 were 0.740 ± 0.148 mm and 0.842 ± 0.179 mm, respectively. Men had higher CIMT than women both at baseline and at follow-up (CIMT1: 0.762 ± 0.149 vs 0.723 ± 0.146 mm, P = 0.0149; CIMT2: 0.880 ± 0.189 vs 0.810 ± 0.164 mm, P = 0.0002). Mean annual progression of CIMT (dCIMT) was 0.025 ± 0.022 mm/year. dCIMT was larger in men than in women (0.030 ± 0.025 vs 0.022 ± 0.019 mm, P = 0.0006). In multiple regression analyses, age was an independent risk factor of CIMT in both genders, while dCIMT was associated with age only in men. CONCLUSIONS: Gender difference in CIMT was confirmed in T2DM patients. Moreover, impact of ageing on CIMT progression only existed in men, which might be the reason that gender difference in CIMT increased with age. BioMed Central 2012-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3398844/ /pubmed/22583598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-51 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Zhao, Bo Liu, Yanping Zhang, Yifei Chen, Yuhong Yang, Zhifang Zhu, Ying Zhan, Weiwei Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
title | Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
title_full | Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
title_fullStr | Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
title_short | Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
title_sort | gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-51 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaobo genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy AT liuyanping genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy AT zhangyifei genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy AT chenyuhong genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy AT yangzhifang genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy AT zhuying genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy AT zhanweiwei genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy |