Cargando…

Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Bo, Liu, Yanping, Zhang, Yifei, Chen, Yuhong, Yang, Zhifang, Zhu, Ying, Zhan, Weiwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-51
_version_ 1782238325989441536
author Zhao, Bo
Liu, Yanping
Zhang, Yifei
Chen, Yuhong
Yang, Zhifang
Zhu, Ying
Zhan, Weiwei
author_facet Zhao, Bo
Liu, Yanping
Zhang, Yifei
Chen, Yuhong
Yang, Zhifang
Zhu, Ying
Zhan, Weiwei
author_sort Zhao, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed CIMT in T2DM patients over a 4-year follow-up period. METHODS: 355 T2DM patients (mean age 59 years; 54.9% women) were included in the present study. CIMT were measured using Color Doppler ultrasound. CIMT was measured at baseline (CIMT) in 2006 and at follow-up in 2010. Biochemical and clinical measurements were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Mean value of CIMT1 and CIMT2 were 0.740 ± 0.148 mm and 0.842 ± 0.179 mm, respectively. Men had higher CIMT than women both at baseline and at follow-up (CIMT1: 0.762 ± 0.149 vs 0.723 ± 0.146 mm, P = 0.0149; CIMT2: 0.880 ± 0.189 vs 0.810 ± 0.164 mm, P = 0.0002). Mean annual progression of CIMT (dCIMT) was 0.025 ± 0.022 mm/year. dCIMT was larger in men than in women (0.030 ± 0.025 vs 0.022 ± 0.019 mm, P = 0.0006). In multiple regression analyses, age was an independent risk factor of CIMT in both genders, while dCIMT was associated with age only in men. CONCLUSIONS: Gender difference in CIMT was confirmed in T2DM patients. Moreover, impact of ageing on CIMT progression only existed in men, which might be the reason that gender difference in CIMT increased with age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33988442012-07-18 Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study Zhao, Bo Liu, Yanping Zhang, Yifei Chen, Yuhong Yang, Zhifang Zhu, Ying Zhan, Weiwei Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Different population studies have reported gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), which is proved to be a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases. However, few longitudinal researches examine this gender difference in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Therefore, we prospectively analyzed CIMT in T2DM patients over a 4-year follow-up period. METHODS: 355 T2DM patients (mean age 59 years; 54.9% women) were included in the present study. CIMT were measured using Color Doppler ultrasound. CIMT was measured at baseline (CIMT) in 2006 and at follow-up in 2010. Biochemical and clinical measurements were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Mean value of CIMT1 and CIMT2 were 0.740 ± 0.148 mm and 0.842 ± 0.179 mm, respectively. Men had higher CIMT than women both at baseline and at follow-up (CIMT1: 0.762 ± 0.149 vs 0.723 ± 0.146 mm, P = 0.0149; CIMT2: 0.880 ± 0.189 vs 0.810 ± 0.164 mm, P = 0.0002). Mean annual progression of CIMT (dCIMT) was 0.025 ± 0.022 mm/year. dCIMT was larger in men than in women (0.030 ± 0.025 vs 0.022 ± 0.019 mm, P = 0.0006). In multiple regression analyses, age was an independent risk factor of CIMT in both genders, while dCIMT was associated with age only in men. CONCLUSIONS: Gender difference in CIMT was confirmed in T2DM patients. Moreover, impact of ageing on CIMT progression only existed in men, which might be the reason that gender difference in CIMT increased with age. BioMed Central 2012-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3398844/ /pubmed/22583598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-51 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Zhao, Bo
Liu, Yanping
Zhang, Yifei
Chen, Yuhong
Yang, Zhifang
Zhu, Ying
Zhan, Weiwei
Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
title Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
title_full Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
title_fullStr Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
title_short Gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
title_sort gender difference in carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetic patients: a 4-year follow-up study
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22583598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-51
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaobo genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy
AT liuyanping genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy
AT zhangyifei genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy
AT chenyuhong genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy
AT yangzhifang genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy
AT zhuying genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy
AT zhanweiwei genderdifferenceincarotidintimamediathicknessintype2diabeticpatientsa4yearfollowupstudy