Cargando…

Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)

Objective To assess the efficacy at 12 months of an early psychosocial counselling and support programme for outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their primary care givers. Design Multicentre, randomised, controlled, rater blinded trial. Setting Primary care and memory clinics in five Danis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waldorff, F B, Buss, D V, Eckermann, A, Rasmussen, M L H, Keiding, N, Rishøj, S, Siersma, V, Sørensen, J, Sørensen, L V, Vogel, A, Waldemar, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22807076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4693
_version_ 1782238329620660224
author Waldorff, F B
Buss, D V
Eckermann, A
Rasmussen, M L H
Keiding, N
Rishøj, S
Siersma, V
Sørensen, J
Sørensen, L V
Vogel, A
Waldemar, G
author_facet Waldorff, F B
Buss, D V
Eckermann, A
Rasmussen, M L H
Keiding, N
Rishøj, S
Siersma, V
Sørensen, J
Sørensen, L V
Vogel, A
Waldemar, G
author_sort Waldorff, F B
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the efficacy at 12 months of an early psychosocial counselling and support programme for outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their primary care givers. Design Multicentre, randomised, controlled, rater blinded trial. Setting Primary care and memory clinics in five Danish districts. Participants 330 outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their 330 primary care givers. Interventions Participating dyads (patient and primary care giver) were randomised to control support during follow-up or to control support plus DAISY intervention (multifaceted and semi-tailored counselling, education, and support). Main outcome measures Primary outcomes at 12 months for patients were change from baseline in mini mental state examination (MMSE) score, Cornell depression scale score, and proxy rated European quality of life visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) score. For care givers, outcomes were change from baseline in geriatric depression scale (GDS 30 items) score and EQ-VAS score. Results Because of multiple testing, statistical significance was set at an adjusted P limit of <0.0005. At 12 months there were no significant differences between the two allocation groups in changes from baseline in the primary and secondary outcomes. However, although non-significant with the adjusted P limit, a small difference was observed for one of the primary patient outcomes (Cornell depression scale score) in patients in favour of the DAISY intervention group before and after adjusting for attrition (P=0.0146 and P=0.0103 respectively). Conclusions The multifaceted, semi-tailored intervention with counselling, education, and support for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their care givers did not have any significant effect beyond that with well structured follow-up support at 12 months after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The small positive effect found in the unadjusted primary outcome addressing depressive symptoms in patients may call for further research focusing on patients with Alzheimer’s disease and comorbid depression. Trial registration ISRCTN74848736.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33988602012-07-18 Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY) Waldorff, F B Buss, D V Eckermann, A Rasmussen, M L H Keiding, N Rishøj, S Siersma, V Sørensen, J Sørensen, L V Vogel, A Waldemar, G BMJ Research Objective To assess the efficacy at 12 months of an early psychosocial counselling and support programme for outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their primary care givers. Design Multicentre, randomised, controlled, rater blinded trial. Setting Primary care and memory clinics in five Danish districts. Participants 330 outpatients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their 330 primary care givers. Interventions Participating dyads (patient and primary care giver) were randomised to control support during follow-up or to control support plus DAISY intervention (multifaceted and semi-tailored counselling, education, and support). Main outcome measures Primary outcomes at 12 months for patients were change from baseline in mini mental state examination (MMSE) score, Cornell depression scale score, and proxy rated European quality of life visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) score. For care givers, outcomes were change from baseline in geriatric depression scale (GDS 30 items) score and EQ-VAS score. Results Because of multiple testing, statistical significance was set at an adjusted P limit of <0.0005. At 12 months there were no significant differences between the two allocation groups in changes from baseline in the primary and secondary outcomes. However, although non-significant with the adjusted P limit, a small difference was observed for one of the primary patient outcomes (Cornell depression scale score) in patients in favour of the DAISY intervention group before and after adjusting for attrition (P=0.0146 and P=0.0103 respectively). Conclusions The multifaceted, semi-tailored intervention with counselling, education, and support for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease and their care givers did not have any significant effect beyond that with well structured follow-up support at 12 months after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The small positive effect found in the unadjusted primary outcome addressing depressive symptoms in patients may call for further research focusing on patients with Alzheimer’s disease and comorbid depression. Trial registration ISRCTN74848736. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2012-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3398860/ /pubmed/22807076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4693 Text en © Waldorff et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Waldorff, F B
Buss, D V
Eckermann, A
Rasmussen, M L H
Keiding, N
Rishøj, S
Siersma, V
Sørensen, J
Sørensen, L V
Vogel, A
Waldemar, G
Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
title Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
title_full Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
title_fullStr Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
title_short Efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY)
title_sort efficacy of psychosocial intervention in patients with mild alzheimer’s disease: the multicentre, rater blinded, randomised danish alzheimer intervention study (daisy)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22807076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4693
work_keys_str_mv AT waldorfffb efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT bussdv efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT eckermanna efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT rasmussenmlh efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT keidingn efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT rishøjs efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT siersmav efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT sørensenj efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT sørensenlv efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT vogela efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy
AT waldemarg efficacyofpsychosocialinterventioninpatientswithmildalzheimersdiseasethemulticentreraterblindedrandomiseddanishalzheimerinterventionstudydaisy