Cargando…

Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis

How people make decisions under risk remains an as-yet-unresolved but fundamental question. Mainstream theories about risky decision making assume that the core processes involved in reaching a risky decision include weighting each payoff or reward magnitude by its probability and then summing the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Li-Lin, Li, Shu, Jiang, Tianzi, Zhou, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041048
_version_ 1782238331213447168
author Rao, Li-Lin
Li, Shu
Jiang, Tianzi
Zhou, Yuan
author_facet Rao, Li-Lin
Li, Shu
Jiang, Tianzi
Zhou, Yuan
author_sort Rao, Li-Lin
collection PubMed
description How people make decisions under risk remains an as-yet-unresolved but fundamental question. Mainstream theories about risky decision making assume that the core processes involved in reaching a risky decision include weighting each payoff or reward magnitude by its probability and then summing the outcomes. However, recently developed theories question whether payoffs are necessarily weighted by probability when making a risky choice. Using functional connectivity analysis, we aimed to provide neural evidence to answer whether this key assumption of computing expectations holds when making a risky choice. We contrasted a trade-off instruction choice that required participants to integrate probability and payoff information with a preferential choice that did not. Based on the functional connectivity patterns between regions in which activity was detected during both of the decision-making tasks, we classified the regions into two networks. One network includes primarily the left and right lateral prefrontal cortices and posterior parietal cortices, which were found to be related to probability in previous reports, and the other network is composed of the bilateral basal ganglia, which have been implicated in payoff. We also found that connectivity between the payoff network and some regions in the probability network (including the left lateral prefrontal cortices and bilateral inferior parietal lobes) were stronger during the trade-off instruction choice task than during the preferential choice task. This indicates that the functional integration between the probability and payoff networks during preferential choice was not as strong as the integration during trade-off instruction choice. Our results provide neural evidence that the weighting process uniformly predicted by the mainstream theory is unnecessary during preferential choice. Thus, our functional integration findings can provide a new direction for the investigation of the principles of risky decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33988692012-07-19 Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis Rao, Li-Lin Li, Shu Jiang, Tianzi Zhou, Yuan PLoS One Research Article How people make decisions under risk remains an as-yet-unresolved but fundamental question. Mainstream theories about risky decision making assume that the core processes involved in reaching a risky decision include weighting each payoff or reward magnitude by its probability and then summing the outcomes. However, recently developed theories question whether payoffs are necessarily weighted by probability when making a risky choice. Using functional connectivity analysis, we aimed to provide neural evidence to answer whether this key assumption of computing expectations holds when making a risky choice. We contrasted a trade-off instruction choice that required participants to integrate probability and payoff information with a preferential choice that did not. Based on the functional connectivity patterns between regions in which activity was detected during both of the decision-making tasks, we classified the regions into two networks. One network includes primarily the left and right lateral prefrontal cortices and posterior parietal cortices, which were found to be related to probability in previous reports, and the other network is composed of the bilateral basal ganglia, which have been implicated in payoff. We also found that connectivity between the payoff network and some regions in the probability network (including the left lateral prefrontal cortices and bilateral inferior parietal lobes) were stronger during the trade-off instruction choice task than during the preferential choice task. This indicates that the functional integration between the probability and payoff networks during preferential choice was not as strong as the integration during trade-off instruction choice. Our results provide neural evidence that the weighting process uniformly predicted by the mainstream theory is unnecessary during preferential choice. Thus, our functional integration findings can provide a new direction for the investigation of the principles of risky decision making. Public Library of Science 2012-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3398869/ /pubmed/22815908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041048 Text en Rao et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rao, Li-Lin
Li, Shu
Jiang, Tianzi
Zhou, Yuan
Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis
title Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis
title_full Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis
title_fullStr Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis
title_short Is Payoff Necessarily Weighted by Probability When Making a Risky Choice? Evidence from Functional Connectivity Analysis
title_sort is payoff necessarily weighted by probability when making a risky choice? evidence from functional connectivity analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041048
work_keys_str_mv AT raolilin ispayoffnecessarilyweightedbyprobabilitywhenmakingariskychoiceevidencefromfunctionalconnectivityanalysis
AT lishu ispayoffnecessarilyweightedbyprobabilitywhenmakingariskychoiceevidencefromfunctionalconnectivityanalysis
AT jiangtianzi ispayoffnecessarilyweightedbyprobabilitywhenmakingariskychoiceevidencefromfunctionalconnectivityanalysis
AT zhouyuan ispayoffnecessarilyweightedbyprobabilitywhenmakingariskychoiceevidencefromfunctionalconnectivityanalysis