Cargando…

The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences

Ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) of mice are increasingly recognized as informative dependent variables in studies using mouse models of human diseases. While pup vocalizations primarily serve to re-establish contact with the mother, adult male “songs” were considered to be courtship signals. Alternat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammerschmidt, Kurt, Radyushkin, Konstantin, Ehrenreich, Hannelore, Fischer, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041133
_version_ 1782238344170700800
author Hammerschmidt, Kurt
Radyushkin, Konstantin
Ehrenreich, Hannelore
Fischer, Julia
author_facet Hammerschmidt, Kurt
Radyushkin, Konstantin
Ehrenreich, Hannelore
Fischer, Julia
author_sort Hammerschmidt, Kurt
collection PubMed
description Ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) of mice are increasingly recognized as informative dependent variables in studies using mouse models of human diseases. While pup vocalizations primarily serve to re-establish contact with the mother, adult male “songs” were considered to be courtship signals. Alternatively, mouse USVs may generally function as territorial signals. To distinguish between these two hypotheses, we compared the structure and usage of adult male and female USVs in staged resident-intruder encounters. If calls function primarily as courtship signals, males should respond stronger than females, specifically when presented with a female intruder. Refuting this hypothesis, we found that in response to female intruders, females called more than males (228±32 calls/min vs. 71±15 calls/min), and males called more to female than to male intruders (14±7.5 calls/min). There were no significant differences in the acoustic characteristics of the calls given by females and males. To control for the influence of the intruder's behavior on calling, we repeated the experiments using anaesthetized intruders. Again, females produced more calls to female than male intruders (173±17 calls/min vs. 71±15 calls/min), while males called more in response to female than male intruders (39±17 calls/min), and there were no acoustic differences in female and male calls. The vocal activity did not differ significantly with regard to intruder state (awake or anaesthetized), while the acoustic structure exhibited significant differences. Taken together, our findings support the view that calls do not mainly function as courtship signals, although they might serve both a territorial (sex-independent) and a courtship function. The comparison of responses to awake vs. anaesthetized intruders suggests that the latter are sufficient to elicit vocal activity. The subtle acoustic differences, however, indicate that the subject differentiates between intruder states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3398926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33989262012-07-19 The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences Hammerschmidt, Kurt Radyushkin, Konstantin Ehrenreich, Hannelore Fischer, Julia PLoS One Research Article Ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) of mice are increasingly recognized as informative dependent variables in studies using mouse models of human diseases. While pup vocalizations primarily serve to re-establish contact with the mother, adult male “songs” were considered to be courtship signals. Alternatively, mouse USVs may generally function as territorial signals. To distinguish between these two hypotheses, we compared the structure and usage of adult male and female USVs in staged resident-intruder encounters. If calls function primarily as courtship signals, males should respond stronger than females, specifically when presented with a female intruder. Refuting this hypothesis, we found that in response to female intruders, females called more than males (228±32 calls/min vs. 71±15 calls/min), and males called more to female than to male intruders (14±7.5 calls/min). There were no significant differences in the acoustic characteristics of the calls given by females and males. To control for the influence of the intruder's behavior on calling, we repeated the experiments using anaesthetized intruders. Again, females produced more calls to female than male intruders (173±17 calls/min vs. 71±15 calls/min), while males called more in response to female than male intruders (39±17 calls/min), and there were no acoustic differences in female and male calls. The vocal activity did not differ significantly with regard to intruder state (awake or anaesthetized), while the acoustic structure exhibited significant differences. Taken together, our findings support the view that calls do not mainly function as courtship signals, although they might serve both a territorial (sex-independent) and a courtship function. The comparison of responses to awake vs. anaesthetized intruders suggests that the latter are sufficient to elicit vocal activity. The subtle acoustic differences, however, indicate that the subject differentiates between intruder states. Public Library of Science 2012-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3398926/ /pubmed/22815941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041133 Text en Hammerschmidt et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hammerschmidt, Kurt
Radyushkin, Konstantin
Ehrenreich, Hannelore
Fischer, Julia
The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences
title The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences
title_full The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences
title_fullStr The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences
title_full_unstemmed The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences
title_short The Structure and Usage of Female and Male Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations Reveal only Minor Differences
title_sort structure and usage of female and male mouse ultrasonic vocalizations reveal only minor differences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3398926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041133
work_keys_str_mv AT hammerschmidtkurt thestructureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT radyushkinkonstantin thestructureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT ehrenreichhannelore thestructureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT fischerjulia thestructureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT hammerschmidtkurt structureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT radyushkinkonstantin structureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT ehrenreichhannelore structureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences
AT fischerjulia structureandusageoffemaleandmalemouseultrasonicvocalizationsrevealonlyminordifferences