Cargando…

The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird

Little is understood about how environmental heterogeneity influences the spatial dynamics of sexual selection. Within human-dominated systems, habitat modification creates environmental heterogeneity that could influence the adaptive value of individual phenotypes. Here, we used the gray catbird to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryder, Thomas B, Fleischer, Robert C, Shriver, W Greg, Marra, Peter P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.254
_version_ 1782238374754516992
author Ryder, Thomas B
Fleischer, Robert C
Shriver, W Greg
Marra, Peter P
author_facet Ryder, Thomas B
Fleischer, Robert C
Shriver, W Greg
Marra, Peter P
author_sort Ryder, Thomas B
collection PubMed
description Little is understood about how environmental heterogeneity influences the spatial dynamics of sexual selection. Within human-dominated systems, habitat modification creates environmental heterogeneity that could influence the adaptive value of individual phenotypes. Here, we used the gray catbird to examine if the ecological conditions experienced in the suburban matrix (SM) and embedded suburban parks (SP) influence reproductive strategies and the strength of sexual selection. Our results show that these habitats varied in a key ecological factor, breeding density. Moreover, this ecological factor was closely tied to reproductive strategies such that local breeding density predicted the probability that a nest would contain extra-pair offspring. Partitioning reproductive variance showed that while within-pair success was more important in both habitats, extra-pair success increased the opportunity for sexual selection by 39% at higher breeding densities. Body size was a strong predictor of relative reproductive success and was under directional selection in both habitats. Importantly, our results show that the strength of sexual selection did not differ among habitats at the landscape scale but rather that fine-scale variation in an ecological factor, breeding density, influenced sexual selection on male phenotypes. Here, we document density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory bird and hypothesize that coarse-scale environmental heterogeneity, in this case generated by anthropogenic habitat modification, changed the fine-scale ecological conditions that drove the spatial dynamics of sexual selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3399163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33991632012-07-26 The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird Ryder, Thomas B Fleischer, Robert C Shriver, W Greg Marra, Peter P Ecol Evol Original Research Little is understood about how environmental heterogeneity influences the spatial dynamics of sexual selection. Within human-dominated systems, habitat modification creates environmental heterogeneity that could influence the adaptive value of individual phenotypes. Here, we used the gray catbird to examine if the ecological conditions experienced in the suburban matrix (SM) and embedded suburban parks (SP) influence reproductive strategies and the strength of sexual selection. Our results show that these habitats varied in a key ecological factor, breeding density. Moreover, this ecological factor was closely tied to reproductive strategies such that local breeding density predicted the probability that a nest would contain extra-pair offspring. Partitioning reproductive variance showed that while within-pair success was more important in both habitats, extra-pair success increased the opportunity for sexual selection by 39% at higher breeding densities. Body size was a strong predictor of relative reproductive success and was under directional selection in both habitats. Importantly, our results show that the strength of sexual selection did not differ among habitats at the landscape scale but rather that fine-scale variation in an ecological factor, breeding density, influenced sexual selection on male phenotypes. Here, we document density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory bird and hypothesize that coarse-scale environmental heterogeneity, in this case generated by anthropogenic habitat modification, changed the fine-scale ecological conditions that drove the spatial dynamics of sexual selection. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3399163/ /pubmed/22837842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.254 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ryder, Thomas B
Fleischer, Robert C
Shriver, W Greg
Marra, Peter P
The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
title The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
title_full The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
title_fullStr The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
title_full_unstemmed The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
title_short The ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
title_sort ecological–evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.254
work_keys_str_mv AT ryderthomasb theecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT fleischerrobertc theecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT shriverwgreg theecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT marrapeterp theecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT ryderthomasb ecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT fleischerrobertc ecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT shriverwgreg ecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird
AT marrapeterp ecologicalevolutionaryinterplaydensitydependentsexualselectioninamigratorysongbird