Cargando…

A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data

Genetic structure is ubiquitous in wild populations and is the result of the processes of natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow. Genetic drift and divergent selection promotes the generation of genetic structure, while gene flow homogenizes the subpopulations. The ability to dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Owen R, Wang, Jinliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.237
_version_ 1782238376110325760
author Jones, Owen R
Wang, Jinliang
author_facet Jones, Owen R
Wang, Jinliang
author_sort Jones, Owen R
collection PubMed
description Genetic structure is ubiquitous in wild populations and is the result of the processes of natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow. Genetic drift and divergent selection promotes the generation of genetic structure, while gene flow homogenizes the subpopulations. The ability to detect genetic structure from marker data diminishes rapidly with a decreasing level of differentiation among subpopulations. Weak genetic structure may be unimportant over evolutionary time scales but could have important implications in ecology and conservation biology. In this paper we examine methods for detecting and quantifying weak genetic structures using simulated data. We simulated populations consisting of two putative subpopulations evolving for up to 50 generations with varying degrees of gene flow (migration), and varying amounts of information (allelic diversity). There are a number of techniques available to detect and quantify genetic structure but here we concentrate on four methods: F(ST), population assignment, relatedness, and sibship assignment. Under the simple mating system simulated here, the four methods produce qualitatively similar results. However, the assignment method performed relatively poorly when genetic structure was weak and we therefore caution against using this method when the analytical aim is to detect fine-scale patterns. Further work should examine situations with different mating systems, for example where a few individuals dominate reproductive output of the population. This study will help workers to design their experiments (e.g., sample sizes of markers and individuals), and to decide which methods are likely to be most appropriate for their particular data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3399169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33991692012-07-26 A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data Jones, Owen R Wang, Jinliang Ecol Evol Original Research Genetic structure is ubiquitous in wild populations and is the result of the processes of natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow. Genetic drift and divergent selection promotes the generation of genetic structure, while gene flow homogenizes the subpopulations. The ability to detect genetic structure from marker data diminishes rapidly with a decreasing level of differentiation among subpopulations. Weak genetic structure may be unimportant over evolutionary time scales but could have important implications in ecology and conservation biology. In this paper we examine methods for detecting and quantifying weak genetic structures using simulated data. We simulated populations consisting of two putative subpopulations evolving for up to 50 generations with varying degrees of gene flow (migration), and varying amounts of information (allelic diversity). There are a number of techniques available to detect and quantify genetic structure but here we concentrate on four methods: F(ST), population assignment, relatedness, and sibship assignment. Under the simple mating system simulated here, the four methods produce qualitatively similar results. However, the assignment method performed relatively poorly when genetic structure was weak and we therefore caution against using this method when the analytical aim is to detect fine-scale patterns. Further work should examine situations with different mating systems, for example where a few individuals dominate reproductive output of the population. This study will help workers to design their experiments (e.g., sample sizes of markers and individuals), and to decide which methods are likely to be most appropriate for their particular data. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3399169/ /pubmed/22837848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.237 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jones, Owen R
Wang, Jinliang
A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
title A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
title_full A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
title_fullStr A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
title_short A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
title_sort comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.237
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesowenr acomparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata
AT wangjinliang acomparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata
AT jonesowenr comparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata
AT wangjinliang comparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata