Cargando…
A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data
Genetic structure is ubiquitous in wild populations and is the result of the processes of natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow. Genetic drift and divergent selection promotes the generation of genetic structure, while gene flow homogenizes the subpopulations. The ability to dete...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.237 |
_version_ | 1782238376110325760 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Owen R Wang, Jinliang |
author_facet | Jones, Owen R Wang, Jinliang |
author_sort | Jones, Owen R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic structure is ubiquitous in wild populations and is the result of the processes of natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow. Genetic drift and divergent selection promotes the generation of genetic structure, while gene flow homogenizes the subpopulations. The ability to detect genetic structure from marker data diminishes rapidly with a decreasing level of differentiation among subpopulations. Weak genetic structure may be unimportant over evolutionary time scales but could have important implications in ecology and conservation biology. In this paper we examine methods for detecting and quantifying weak genetic structures using simulated data. We simulated populations consisting of two putative subpopulations evolving for up to 50 generations with varying degrees of gene flow (migration), and varying amounts of information (allelic diversity). There are a number of techniques available to detect and quantify genetic structure but here we concentrate on four methods: F(ST), population assignment, relatedness, and sibship assignment. Under the simple mating system simulated here, the four methods produce qualitatively similar results. However, the assignment method performed relatively poorly when genetic structure was weak and we therefore caution against using this method when the analytical aim is to detect fine-scale patterns. Further work should examine situations with different mating systems, for example where a few individuals dominate reproductive output of the population. This study will help workers to design their experiments (e.g., sample sizes of markers and individuals), and to decide which methods are likely to be most appropriate for their particular data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3399169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33991692012-07-26 A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data Jones, Owen R Wang, Jinliang Ecol Evol Original Research Genetic structure is ubiquitous in wild populations and is the result of the processes of natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, and gene flow. Genetic drift and divergent selection promotes the generation of genetic structure, while gene flow homogenizes the subpopulations. The ability to detect genetic structure from marker data diminishes rapidly with a decreasing level of differentiation among subpopulations. Weak genetic structure may be unimportant over evolutionary time scales but could have important implications in ecology and conservation biology. In this paper we examine methods for detecting and quantifying weak genetic structures using simulated data. We simulated populations consisting of two putative subpopulations evolving for up to 50 generations with varying degrees of gene flow (migration), and varying amounts of information (allelic diversity). There are a number of techniques available to detect and quantify genetic structure but here we concentrate on four methods: F(ST), population assignment, relatedness, and sibship assignment. Under the simple mating system simulated here, the four methods produce qualitatively similar results. However, the assignment method performed relatively poorly when genetic structure was weak and we therefore caution against using this method when the analytical aim is to detect fine-scale patterns. Further work should examine situations with different mating systems, for example where a few individuals dominate reproductive output of the population. This study will help workers to design their experiments (e.g., sample sizes of markers and individuals), and to decide which methods are likely to be most appropriate for their particular data. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3399169/ /pubmed/22837848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.237 Text en © 2012 The Authors. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jones, Owen R Wang, Jinliang A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
title | A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
title_full | A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
title_fullStr | A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
title_short | A comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
title_sort | comparison of four methods for detecting weak genetic structure from marker data |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesowenr acomparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata AT wangjinliang acomparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata AT jonesowenr comparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata AT wangjinliang comparisonoffourmethodsfordetectingweakgeneticstructurefrommarkerdata |