Cargando…

Thinking Animals: A Closed Case or an Open Debate?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Parrish, Audrey E., Beran, Michael J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:	Psychology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399224/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00250

Ejemplares similares

How Illusory Is the Solitaire Illusion? Assessing the Degree of Misperception of Numerosity in Adult Humans
por: Agrillo, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Commentary: A crisis in comparative psychology: where have all the undergraduates gone?
por: Beran, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Do Social Conditions Affect Capuchin Monkeys’ (Cebus apella) Choices in a Quantity Judgment Task?
por: Beran, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Exploring the Effects of Argument Map-Supported Online Group Debate Activities on College Students’ Critical Thinking
por: Chen, Xinya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Bidirectional Relation Between Counterfactual Thinking and Closeness, Controllability, and Exceptionality
por: Xie, Yibo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Thinking eyes: visual thinking strategies and the social brain
por: van Leeuwen, Janneke E. P., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Human–Autonomy Teaming: Definitions, Debates, and Directions
por: Lyons, Joseph B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Unconscious Imagination and the Mental Imagery Debate
por: Brogaard, Berit, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Editorial: Self and Memory: A Multidisciplinary Debate
por: Guerini, Rossella, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Meditate to Create: The Impact of Focused-Attention and Open-Monitoring Training on Convergent and Divergent Thinking
por: Colzato, Lorenza S., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Consistently Inconsistent Perceptual Illusions in Nonhuman Primates: The Importance of Individual Differences
por: Beran, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Thinking about Kindergarten thinking: A mixed methods study
por: Braund, Heather
Publicado: (2022)

Book Review: “Blink: the power of thinking without thinking”
por: Adhiya, Khushali
Publicado: (2015)

Defending the use of the mutual manipulability criterion in the extended cognition debate
por: Gillett, Alexander James, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Corrigendum: Book Review: “Blink: the power of thinking without thinking”
por: Adhiya, Khushali
Publicado: (2017)

Redefining Critical Thinking: Teaching Students to Think like Scientists
por: Schmaltz, Rodney M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Effect of Zhongyong Thinking on Remote Association Thinking: An EEG Study
por: Zhou, Zhijin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interactive Association of Negative Creative Thinking and Malevolent Creative Thinking
por: Dou, Xinyu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Affective Primacy vs. Cognitive Primacy: Dissolving the Debate
por: Lai, Vicky Tzuyin, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Bear in mind: the role of personal background in semantic animal fluency – The SMART-MR study
por: Smit, Annelot P., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Differential Effect of Contrast Polarity Reversals in Closed Squares and Open L-Junctions
por: Schira, Mark M., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Experiencing affective music in eyes-closed and eyes-open states: an electroencephalography study
por: Chang, Yun-Hsuan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Does Mindfulness Enhance Critical Thinking? Evidence for the Mediating Effects of Executive Functioning in the Relationship between Mindfulness and Critical Thinking
por: Noone, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Bilingualism and Creativity: Benefits in Convergent Thinking Come with Losses in Divergent Thinking
por: Hommel, Bernhard, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

“Always opening and never closing”: How dialogical therapists understand and create reflective conversations in network meetings
por: Sidis, A. E., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Open-Book Versus Closed-Book Tests in University Classes: A Field Experiment
por: Rummer, Ralf, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effects of Open Versus Closed Skill Exercise on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review
por: Gu, Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Open Scientific Debate for Conflicts in Science
por: Dieter, Michael P.
Publicado: (1997)

Updating the Debate on Behavioral Competency Development: State of the Art and Future Challenges
por: Bonesso, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Thinking twice: examining gender differences in repetitive negative thinking across the adult lifespan
por: Lilly, Kieren J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Precursors of Openness to Provide Online Counseling: The Role of Future Thinking, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior of Future Online Therapists
por: Alt, Dorit, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Thinking rhythm objects
por: Godøy, Rolf Inge
Publicado: (2022)

Perspectives on the semantics/pragmatics debate: insights from aphasia research
por: Graci, Roberto, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Construction and Validation of an Anticipatory Thinking Assessment
por: Geden, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Openness to Experience as a Moderator of the Relationship between Intelligence and Creative Thinking: A Study of Chinese Children in Urban and Rural Areas
por: Shi, Baoguo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): French Validation of a Transdiagnostic Measure of Repetitive Negative Thinking
por: Devynck, Faustine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Measuring the Candidates' Emotions in Political Debates Based on Facial Expression Recognition Techniques
por: Rodríguez-Fuertes, Alfredo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Open debate and progress in ecology and evolution
por: Moore, Allen J
Publicado: (2011)

Did You Ever Hear the One About the Horse that Could Count?
por: Beran, Michael J.
Publicado: (2012)

The comparative science of “self-control”: what are we talking about?
por: Beran, Michael J.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_d3lf4546vdhp9jcquv493crnur