Cargando…
External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
Background. Multivariate models are used to increase prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. An external validation of the artificial neural network (ANN) “ProstataClass” (ANN-Charité) was performed with daily routine data. Materials and Methods. The individual ANN p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scholarly Research Network
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22830050 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/643181 |
_version_ | 1782238407690289152 |
---|---|
author | Ecke, Thorsten H. Hallmann, Steffen Koch, Stefan Ruttloff, Jürgen Cammann, Henning Gerullis, Holger Miller, Kurt Stephan, Carsten |
author_facet | Ecke, Thorsten H. Hallmann, Steffen Koch, Stefan Ruttloff, Jürgen Cammann, Henning Gerullis, Holger Miller, Kurt Stephan, Carsten |
author_sort | Ecke, Thorsten H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Multivariate models are used to increase prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. An external validation of the artificial neural network (ANN) “ProstataClass” (ANN-Charité) was performed with daily routine data. Materials and Methods. The individual ANN predictions were generated with the use of the ANN application for PSA and free PSA assays, which rely on age, tPSA, %fPSA, prostate volume, and DRE (ANN-Charité). Diagnostic validity of tPSA, %fPSA, and the ANN was evaluated by ROC curve analysis and comparisons of observed versus predicted probabilities. Results. Overall, 101 (35.8%) PCa were detected. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.501 for tPSA, 0.669 for %fPSA, 0.694 for ANN-Charité, 0.713 for nomogram I, and 0.742 for nomogram II, showing a significant advantage for nomogram II (P = 0.009) compared with %fPSA while the other model did not differ from %fPSA (P = 0.15 and P = 0.41). All models overestimated the predicted PCa probability. Conclusions. Beside ROC analysis, calibration is an important tool to determine the true value of using a model in clinical practice. The worth of multivariate models is limited when external validations were performed without knowledge of the circumstances of the model's development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3399415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | International Scholarly Research Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33994152012-07-24 External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection Ecke, Thorsten H. Hallmann, Steffen Koch, Stefan Ruttloff, Jürgen Cammann, Henning Gerullis, Holger Miller, Kurt Stephan, Carsten ISRN Urol Research Article Background. Multivariate models are used to increase prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. An external validation of the artificial neural network (ANN) “ProstataClass” (ANN-Charité) was performed with daily routine data. Materials and Methods. The individual ANN predictions were generated with the use of the ANN application for PSA and free PSA assays, which rely on age, tPSA, %fPSA, prostate volume, and DRE (ANN-Charité). Diagnostic validity of tPSA, %fPSA, and the ANN was evaluated by ROC curve analysis and comparisons of observed versus predicted probabilities. Results. Overall, 101 (35.8%) PCa were detected. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.501 for tPSA, 0.669 for %fPSA, 0.694 for ANN-Charité, 0.713 for nomogram I, and 0.742 for nomogram II, showing a significant advantage for nomogram II (P = 0.009) compared with %fPSA while the other model did not differ from %fPSA (P = 0.15 and P = 0.41). All models overestimated the predicted PCa probability. Conclusions. Beside ROC analysis, calibration is an important tool to determine the true value of using a model in clinical practice. The worth of multivariate models is limited when external validations were performed without knowledge of the circumstances of the model's development. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3399415/ /pubmed/22830050 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/643181 Text en Copyright © 2012 Thorsten H. Ecke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ecke, Thorsten H. Hallmann, Steffen Koch, Stefan Ruttloff, Jürgen Cammann, Henning Gerullis, Holger Miller, Kurt Stephan, Carsten External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection |
title | External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection |
title_full | External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection |
title_fullStr | External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection |
title_short | External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection |
title_sort | external validation of an artificial neural network and two nomograms for prostate cancer detection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22830050 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/643181 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eckethorstenh externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT hallmannsteffen externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT kochstefan externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT ruttloffjurgen externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT cammannhenning externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT gerullisholger externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT millerkurt externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection AT stephancarsten externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection |