Cargando…

External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection

Background. Multivariate models are used to increase prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. An external validation of the artificial neural network (ANN) “ProstataClass” (ANN-Charité) was performed with daily routine data. Materials and Methods. The individual ANN p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ecke, Thorsten H., Hallmann, Steffen, Koch, Stefan, Ruttloff, Jürgen, Cammann, Henning, Gerullis, Holger, Miller, Kurt, Stephan, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scholarly Research Network 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22830050
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/643181
_version_ 1782238407690289152
author Ecke, Thorsten H.
Hallmann, Steffen
Koch, Stefan
Ruttloff, Jürgen
Cammann, Henning
Gerullis, Holger
Miller, Kurt
Stephan, Carsten
author_facet Ecke, Thorsten H.
Hallmann, Steffen
Koch, Stefan
Ruttloff, Jürgen
Cammann, Henning
Gerullis, Holger
Miller, Kurt
Stephan, Carsten
author_sort Ecke, Thorsten H.
collection PubMed
description Background. Multivariate models are used to increase prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. An external validation of the artificial neural network (ANN) “ProstataClass” (ANN-Charité) was performed with daily routine data. Materials and Methods. The individual ANN predictions were generated with the use of the ANN application for PSA and free PSA assays, which rely on age, tPSA, %fPSA, prostate volume, and DRE (ANN-Charité). Diagnostic validity of tPSA, %fPSA, and the ANN was evaluated by ROC curve analysis and comparisons of observed versus predicted probabilities. Results. Overall, 101 (35.8%) PCa were detected. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.501 for tPSA, 0.669 for %fPSA, 0.694 for ANN-Charité, 0.713 for nomogram I, and 0.742 for nomogram II, showing a significant advantage for nomogram II (P = 0.009) compared with %fPSA while the other model did not differ from %fPSA (P = 0.15 and P = 0.41). All models overestimated the predicted PCa probability. Conclusions. Beside ROC analysis, calibration is an important tool to determine the true value of using a model in clinical practice. The worth of multivariate models is limited when external validations were performed without knowledge of the circumstances of the model's development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3399415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Scholarly Research Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-33994152012-07-24 External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection Ecke, Thorsten H. Hallmann, Steffen Koch, Stefan Ruttloff, Jürgen Cammann, Henning Gerullis, Holger Miller, Kurt Stephan, Carsten ISRN Urol Research Article Background. Multivariate models are used to increase prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate and to reduce unnecessary biopsies. An external validation of the artificial neural network (ANN) “ProstataClass” (ANN-Charité) was performed with daily routine data. Materials and Methods. The individual ANN predictions were generated with the use of the ANN application for PSA and free PSA assays, which rely on age, tPSA, %fPSA, prostate volume, and DRE (ANN-Charité). Diagnostic validity of tPSA, %fPSA, and the ANN was evaluated by ROC curve analysis and comparisons of observed versus predicted probabilities. Results. Overall, 101 (35.8%) PCa were detected. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.501 for tPSA, 0.669 for %fPSA, 0.694 for ANN-Charité, 0.713 for nomogram I, and 0.742 for nomogram II, showing a significant advantage for nomogram II (P = 0.009) compared with %fPSA while the other model did not differ from %fPSA (P = 0.15 and P = 0.41). All models overestimated the predicted PCa probability. Conclusions. Beside ROC analysis, calibration is an important tool to determine the true value of using a model in clinical practice. The worth of multivariate models is limited when external validations were performed without knowledge of the circumstances of the model's development. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3399415/ /pubmed/22830050 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/643181 Text en Copyright © 2012 Thorsten H. Ecke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ecke, Thorsten H.
Hallmann, Steffen
Koch, Stefan
Ruttloff, Jürgen
Cammann, Henning
Gerullis, Holger
Miller, Kurt
Stephan, Carsten
External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
title External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_full External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_fullStr External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_full_unstemmed External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_short External Validation of an Artificial Neural Network and Two Nomograms for Prostate Cancer Detection
title_sort external validation of an artificial neural network and two nomograms for prostate cancer detection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22830050
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/643181
work_keys_str_mv AT eckethorstenh externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT hallmannsteffen externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT kochstefan externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT ruttloffjurgen externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT cammannhenning externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT gerullisholger externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT millerkurt externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection
AT stephancarsten externalvalidationofanartificialneuralnetworkandtwonomogramsforprostatecancerdetection