Cargando…
Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity
A common problem in molecular biology is to use experimental data, such as microarray data, to infer knowledge about the structure of interactions between important molecules in subsystems of the cell. By approximating the state of each molecule as “on” or “off”, it becomes possible to simplify the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040330 |
_version_ | 1782238447060123648 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Guanyu Rong, Yongwu Chen, Hao Pearson, Carl Du, Chenghang Simha, Rahul Zeng, Chen |
author_facet | Wang, Guanyu Rong, Yongwu Chen, Hao Pearson, Carl Du, Chenghang Simha, Rahul Zeng, Chen |
author_sort | Wang, Guanyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | A common problem in molecular biology is to use experimental data, such as microarray data, to infer knowledge about the structure of interactions between important molecules in subsystems of the cell. By approximating the state of each molecule as “on” or “off”, it becomes possible to simplify the problem, and exploit the tools of Boolean analysis for such inference. Amongst Boolean techniques, the process-driven approach has shown promise in being able to identify putative network structures, as well as stability and modularity properties. This paper examines the process-driven approach more formally, and makes four contributions about the computational complexity of the inference problem, under the “dominant inhibition” assumption of molecular interactions. The first is a proof that the feasibility problem (does there exist a network that explains the data?) can be solved in polynomial-time. Second, the minimality problem (what is the smallest network that explains the data?) is shown to be NP-hard, and therefore unlikely to result in a polynomial-time algorithm. Third, a simple polynomial-time heuristic is shown to produce near-minimal solutions, as demonstrated by simulation. Fourth, the theoretical framework explains how multiplicity (the number of network solutions to realize a given biological process), which can take exponential-time to compute, can instead be accurately estimated by a fast, polynomial-time heuristic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3399897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-33998972012-07-19 Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity Wang, Guanyu Rong, Yongwu Chen, Hao Pearson, Carl Du, Chenghang Simha, Rahul Zeng, Chen PLoS One Research Article A common problem in molecular biology is to use experimental data, such as microarray data, to infer knowledge about the structure of interactions between important molecules in subsystems of the cell. By approximating the state of each molecule as “on” or “off”, it becomes possible to simplify the problem, and exploit the tools of Boolean analysis for such inference. Amongst Boolean techniques, the process-driven approach has shown promise in being able to identify putative network structures, as well as stability and modularity properties. This paper examines the process-driven approach more formally, and makes four contributions about the computational complexity of the inference problem, under the “dominant inhibition” assumption of molecular interactions. The first is a proof that the feasibility problem (does there exist a network that explains the data?) can be solved in polynomial-time. Second, the minimality problem (what is the smallest network that explains the data?) is shown to be NP-hard, and therefore unlikely to result in a polynomial-time algorithm. Third, a simple polynomial-time heuristic is shown to produce near-minimal solutions, as demonstrated by simulation. Fourth, the theoretical framework explains how multiplicity (the number of network solutions to realize a given biological process), which can take exponential-time to compute, can instead be accurately estimated by a fast, polynomial-time heuristic. Public Library of Science 2012-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3399897/ /pubmed/22815739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040330 Text en Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Guanyu Rong, Yongwu Chen, Hao Pearson, Carl Du, Chenghang Simha, Rahul Zeng, Chen Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity |
title | Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity |
title_full | Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity |
title_fullStr | Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity |
title_full_unstemmed | Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity |
title_short | Process-Driven Inference of Biological Network Structure: Feasibility, Minimality, and Multiplicity |
title_sort | process-driven inference of biological network structure: feasibility, minimality, and multiplicity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22815739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangguanyu processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity AT rongyongwu processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity AT chenhao processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity AT pearsoncarl processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity AT duchenghang processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity AT simharahul processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity AT zengchen processdriveninferenceofbiologicalnetworkstructurefeasibilityminimalityandmultiplicity |