Cargando…

Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory

The present study investigates the effects of trait anxiety on the neural efficiency of working memory component functions (manipulation vs. maintenance) in the absence of threat-related stimuli. For the manipulation of affectively neutral verbal information held in working memory, high- and low-anx...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basten, Ulrike, Stelzel, Christine, Fiebach, Christian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0100-3
_version_ 1782238449795858432
author Basten, Ulrike
Stelzel, Christine
Fiebach, Christian J.
author_facet Basten, Ulrike
Stelzel, Christine
Fiebach, Christian J.
author_sort Basten, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description The present study investigates the effects of trait anxiety on the neural efficiency of working memory component functions (manipulation vs. maintenance) in the absence of threat-related stimuli. For the manipulation of affectively neutral verbal information held in working memory, high- and low-anxious individuals (N = 46) did not differ in their behavioral performance, yet trait anxiety was positively related to the neural effort expended on task processing, as measured by BOLD signal changes in fMRI. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with stronger activation in two regions implicated in the goal-directed control of attention—that is, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left inferior frontal sulcus—and with stronger deactivation in a region assigned to the brain’s default-mode network—that is, rostral–ventral anterior cingulate cortex. Furthermore, anxiety was associated with a stronger functional coupling of right DLPFC with ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. We interpret our findings as reflecting reduced processing efficiency in high-anxious individuals and point out the need to consider measures of functional integration in addition to measures of regional activation strength when investigating individual differences in neural efficiency. With respect to the functions of working memory, we conclude that anxiety specifically impairs the processing efficiency of (control-demanding) manipulation processes (as opposed to mere maintenance). Notably, this study contributes to an accumulating body of evidence showing that anxiety also affects cognitive processing in the absence of threat-related stimuli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0100-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3400031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34000312012-07-25 Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory Basten, Ulrike Stelzel, Christine Fiebach, Christian J. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Article The present study investigates the effects of trait anxiety on the neural efficiency of working memory component functions (manipulation vs. maintenance) in the absence of threat-related stimuli. For the manipulation of affectively neutral verbal information held in working memory, high- and low-anxious individuals (N = 46) did not differ in their behavioral performance, yet trait anxiety was positively related to the neural effort expended on task processing, as measured by BOLD signal changes in fMRI. Higher levels of anxiety were associated with stronger activation in two regions implicated in the goal-directed control of attention—that is, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left inferior frontal sulcus—and with stronger deactivation in a region assigned to the brain’s default-mode network—that is, rostral–ventral anterior cingulate cortex. Furthermore, anxiety was associated with a stronger functional coupling of right DLPFC with ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. We interpret our findings as reflecting reduced processing efficiency in high-anxious individuals and point out the need to consider measures of functional integration in addition to measures of regional activation strength when investigating individual differences in neural efficiency. With respect to the functions of working memory, we conclude that anxiety specifically impairs the processing efficiency of (control-demanding) manipulation processes (as opposed to mere maintenance). Notably, this study contributes to an accumulating body of evidence showing that anxiety also affects cognitive processing in the absence of threat-related stimuli. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0100-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-05-29 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3400031/ /pubmed/22644759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0100-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Basten, Ulrike
Stelzel, Christine
Fiebach, Christian J.
Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
title Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
title_full Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
title_fullStr Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
title_full_unstemmed Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
title_short Trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
title_sort trait anxiety and the neural efficiency of manipulation in working memory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22644759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0100-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bastenulrike traitanxietyandtheneuralefficiencyofmanipulationinworkingmemory
AT stelzelchristine traitanxietyandtheneuralefficiencyofmanipulationinworkingmemory
AT fiebachchristianj traitanxietyandtheneuralefficiencyofmanipulationinworkingmemory