Cargando…

Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities

Microbial biofilms assemble from cells that attach to a surface, where they develop into matrix-enclosed communities. Mechanistic insights into community assembly are crucial to better understand the functioning of natural biofilms, which drive key ecosystem processes in numerous aquatic habitats. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Besemer, Katharina, Peter, Hannes, Logue, Jürg B, Langenheder, Silke, Lindström, Eva S, Tranvik, Lars J, Battin, Tom J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22237539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.205
_version_ 1782238487841341440
author Besemer, Katharina
Peter, Hannes
Logue, Jürg B
Langenheder, Silke
Lindström, Eva S
Tranvik, Lars J
Battin, Tom J
author_facet Besemer, Katharina
Peter, Hannes
Logue, Jürg B
Langenheder, Silke
Lindström, Eva S
Tranvik, Lars J
Battin, Tom J
author_sort Besemer, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Microbial biofilms assemble from cells that attach to a surface, where they develop into matrix-enclosed communities. Mechanistic insights into community assembly are crucial to better understand the functioning of natural biofilms, which drive key ecosystem processes in numerous aquatic habitats. We studied the role of the suspended microbial community as the source of the biofilm community in three streams using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism and 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 16S rRNA gene (as a measure for the active and the bulk community, respectively). Diversity was consistently lower in the biofilm communities than in the suspended stream water communities. We propose that the higher diversity in the suspended communities is supported by continuous inflow from various sources within the catchment. Community composition clearly differed between biofilms and suspended communities, whereas biofilm communities were similar in all three streams. This suggests that biofilm assembly did not simply reflect differences in the source communities, but that certain microbial groups from the source community proliferate in the biofilm. We compared the biofilm communities with random samples of the respective community suspended in the stream water. This analysis confirmed that stochastic dispersal from the source community was unlikely to shape the observed community composition of the biofilms, in support of species sorting as a major biofilm assembly mechanism. Bulk and active populations generated comparable patterns of community composition in the biofilms and the suspended communities, which suggests similar assembly controls on these populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3400417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34004172012-08-01 Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities Besemer, Katharina Peter, Hannes Logue, Jürg B Langenheder, Silke Lindström, Eva S Tranvik, Lars J Battin, Tom J ISME J Original Article Microbial biofilms assemble from cells that attach to a surface, where they develop into matrix-enclosed communities. Mechanistic insights into community assembly are crucial to better understand the functioning of natural biofilms, which drive key ecosystem processes in numerous aquatic habitats. We studied the role of the suspended microbial community as the source of the biofilm community in three streams using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism and 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 16S rRNA gene (as a measure for the active and the bulk community, respectively). Diversity was consistently lower in the biofilm communities than in the suspended stream water communities. We propose that the higher diversity in the suspended communities is supported by continuous inflow from various sources within the catchment. Community composition clearly differed between biofilms and suspended communities, whereas biofilm communities were similar in all three streams. This suggests that biofilm assembly did not simply reflect differences in the source communities, but that certain microbial groups from the source community proliferate in the biofilm. We compared the biofilm communities with random samples of the respective community suspended in the stream water. This analysis confirmed that stochastic dispersal from the source community was unlikely to shape the observed community composition of the biofilms, in support of species sorting as a major biofilm assembly mechanism. Bulk and active populations generated comparable patterns of community composition in the biofilms and the suspended communities, which suggests similar assembly controls on these populations. Nature Publishing Group 2012-08 2012-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3400417/ /pubmed/22237539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.205 Text en Copyright © 2012 International Society for Microbial Ecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Besemer, Katharina
Peter, Hannes
Logue, Jürg B
Langenheder, Silke
Lindström, Eva S
Tranvik, Lars J
Battin, Tom J
Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
title Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
title_full Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
title_fullStr Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
title_full_unstemmed Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
title_short Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
title_sort unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22237539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.205
work_keys_str_mv AT besemerkatharina unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities
AT peterhannes unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities
AT loguejurgb unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities
AT langenhedersilke unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities
AT lindstromevas unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities
AT tranviklarsj unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities
AT battintomj unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities