Cargando…
Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities
Microbial biofilms assemble from cells that attach to a surface, where they develop into matrix-enclosed communities. Mechanistic insights into community assembly are crucial to better understand the functioning of natural biofilms, which drive key ecosystem processes in numerous aquatic habitats. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22237539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.205 |
_version_ | 1782238487841341440 |
---|---|
author | Besemer, Katharina Peter, Hannes Logue, Jürg B Langenheder, Silke Lindström, Eva S Tranvik, Lars J Battin, Tom J |
author_facet | Besemer, Katharina Peter, Hannes Logue, Jürg B Langenheder, Silke Lindström, Eva S Tranvik, Lars J Battin, Tom J |
author_sort | Besemer, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microbial biofilms assemble from cells that attach to a surface, where they develop into matrix-enclosed communities. Mechanistic insights into community assembly are crucial to better understand the functioning of natural biofilms, which drive key ecosystem processes in numerous aquatic habitats. We studied the role of the suspended microbial community as the source of the biofilm community in three streams using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism and 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 16S rRNA gene (as a measure for the active and the bulk community, respectively). Diversity was consistently lower in the biofilm communities than in the suspended stream water communities. We propose that the higher diversity in the suspended communities is supported by continuous inflow from various sources within the catchment. Community composition clearly differed between biofilms and suspended communities, whereas biofilm communities were similar in all three streams. This suggests that biofilm assembly did not simply reflect differences in the source communities, but that certain microbial groups from the source community proliferate in the biofilm. We compared the biofilm communities with random samples of the respective community suspended in the stream water. This analysis confirmed that stochastic dispersal from the source community was unlikely to shape the observed community composition of the biofilms, in support of species sorting as a major biofilm assembly mechanism. Bulk and active populations generated comparable patterns of community composition in the biofilms and the suspended communities, which suggests similar assembly controls on these populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3400417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34004172012-08-01 Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities Besemer, Katharina Peter, Hannes Logue, Jürg B Langenheder, Silke Lindström, Eva S Tranvik, Lars J Battin, Tom J ISME J Original Article Microbial biofilms assemble from cells that attach to a surface, where they develop into matrix-enclosed communities. Mechanistic insights into community assembly are crucial to better understand the functioning of natural biofilms, which drive key ecosystem processes in numerous aquatic habitats. We studied the role of the suspended microbial community as the source of the biofilm community in three streams using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism and 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and the 16S rRNA gene (as a measure for the active and the bulk community, respectively). Diversity was consistently lower in the biofilm communities than in the suspended stream water communities. We propose that the higher diversity in the suspended communities is supported by continuous inflow from various sources within the catchment. Community composition clearly differed between biofilms and suspended communities, whereas biofilm communities were similar in all three streams. This suggests that biofilm assembly did not simply reflect differences in the source communities, but that certain microbial groups from the source community proliferate in the biofilm. We compared the biofilm communities with random samples of the respective community suspended in the stream water. This analysis confirmed that stochastic dispersal from the source community was unlikely to shape the observed community composition of the biofilms, in support of species sorting as a major biofilm assembly mechanism. Bulk and active populations generated comparable patterns of community composition in the biofilms and the suspended communities, which suggests similar assembly controls on these populations. Nature Publishing Group 2012-08 2012-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3400417/ /pubmed/22237539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.205 Text en Copyright © 2012 International Society for Microbial Ecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Besemer, Katharina Peter, Hannes Logue, Jürg B Langenheder, Silke Lindström, Eva S Tranvik, Lars J Battin, Tom J Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
title | Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
title_full | Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
title_fullStr | Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
title_full_unstemmed | Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
title_short | Unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
title_sort | unraveling assembly of stream biofilm communities |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22237539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT besemerkatharina unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities AT peterhannes unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities AT loguejurgb unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities AT langenhedersilke unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities AT lindstromevas unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities AT tranviklarsj unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities AT battintomj unravelingassemblyofstreambiofilmcommunities |