Cargando…
Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance
BACKGROUND: Medical devices increasingly depend on computing functions such as wireless communication and Internet connectivity for software-based control of therapies and network-based transmission of patients’ stored medical information. These computing capabilities introduce security and privacy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22829874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040200 |
_version_ | 1782238519944544256 |
---|---|
author | Kramer, Daniel B. Baker, Matthew Ransford, Benjamin Molina-Markham, Andres Stewart, Quinn Fu, Kevin Reynolds, Matthew R. |
author_facet | Kramer, Daniel B. Baker, Matthew Ransford, Benjamin Molina-Markham, Andres Stewart, Quinn Fu, Kevin Reynolds, Matthew R. |
author_sort | Kramer, Daniel B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical devices increasingly depend on computing functions such as wireless communication and Internet connectivity for software-based control of therapies and network-based transmission of patients’ stored medical information. These computing capabilities introduce security and privacy risks, yet little is known about the prevalence of such risks within the clinical setting. METHODS: We used three comprehensive, publicly available databases maintained by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate recalls and adverse events related to security and privacy risks of medical devices. RESULTS: Review of weekly enforcement reports identified 1,845 recalls; 605 (32.8%) of these included computers, 35 (1.9%) stored patient data, and 31 (1.7%) were capable of wireless communication. Searches of databases specific to recalls and adverse events identified only one event with a specific connection to security or privacy. Software-related recalls were relatively common, and most (81.8%) mentioned the possibility of upgrades, though only half of these provided specific instructions for the update mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of recalls and adverse events from federal government databases reveals sharp inconsistencies with databases at individual providers with respect to security and privacy risks. Recalls related to software may increase security risks because of unprotected update and correction mechanisms. To detect signals of security and privacy problems that adversely affect public health, federal postmarket surveillance strategies should rethink how to effectively and efficiently collect data on security and privacy problems in devices that increasingly depend on computing systems susceptible to malware. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3400651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34006512012-07-24 Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance Kramer, Daniel B. Baker, Matthew Ransford, Benjamin Molina-Markham, Andres Stewart, Quinn Fu, Kevin Reynolds, Matthew R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical devices increasingly depend on computing functions such as wireless communication and Internet connectivity for software-based control of therapies and network-based transmission of patients’ stored medical information. These computing capabilities introduce security and privacy risks, yet little is known about the prevalence of such risks within the clinical setting. METHODS: We used three comprehensive, publicly available databases maintained by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate recalls and adverse events related to security and privacy risks of medical devices. RESULTS: Review of weekly enforcement reports identified 1,845 recalls; 605 (32.8%) of these included computers, 35 (1.9%) stored patient data, and 31 (1.7%) were capable of wireless communication. Searches of databases specific to recalls and adverse events identified only one event with a specific connection to security or privacy. Software-related recalls were relatively common, and most (81.8%) mentioned the possibility of upgrades, though only half of these provided specific instructions for the update mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of recalls and adverse events from federal government databases reveals sharp inconsistencies with databases at individual providers with respect to security and privacy risks. Recalls related to software may increase security risks because of unprotected update and correction mechanisms. To detect signals of security and privacy problems that adversely affect public health, federal postmarket surveillance strategies should rethink how to effectively and efficiently collect data on security and privacy problems in devices that increasingly depend on computing systems susceptible to malware. Public Library of Science 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3400651/ /pubmed/22829874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040200 Text en Kramer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kramer, Daniel B. Baker, Matthew Ransford, Benjamin Molina-Markham, Andres Stewart, Quinn Fu, Kevin Reynolds, Matthew R. Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance |
title | Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance |
title_full | Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance |
title_fullStr | Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance |
title_short | Security and Privacy Qualities of Medical Devices: An Analysis of FDA Postmarket Surveillance |
title_sort | security and privacy qualities of medical devices: an analysis of fda postmarket surveillance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22829874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kramerdanielb securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance AT bakermatthew securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance AT ransfordbenjamin securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance AT molinamarkhamandres securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance AT stewartquinn securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance AT fukevin securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance AT reynoldsmatthewr securityandprivacyqualitiesofmedicaldevicesananalysisoffdapostmarketsurveillance |