Cargando…
Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage?
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of total PSA (tPSA), the free/total PSA ratio (f/tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA) and the complexed/total PSA ratio (c/tPSA) in prostate cancer detection. METHODS: Frozen sera of 442 patients have been analysed for tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and cPSA. 131 patients had pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22024423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-16-10-445 |
_version_ | 1782238554668138496 |
---|---|
author | Strittmatter, F Stieber, P Nagel, D Füllhase, C Walther, S Stief, CG Waidelich, R |
author_facet | Strittmatter, F Stieber, P Nagel, D Füllhase, C Walther, S Stief, CG Waidelich, R |
author_sort | Strittmatter, F |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of total PSA (tPSA), the free/total PSA ratio (f/tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA) and the complexed/total PSA ratio (c/tPSA) in prostate cancer detection. METHODS: Frozen sera of 442 patients have been analysed for tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and cPSA. 131 patients had prostate cancer and 311 patients benign prostatic hyperplasia. RESULTS: Differences in the distribution of the biomarkers were seen as follows: tPSA, cPSA and c/tPSA were significantly higher in the PC group, and f/tPSA was significantly higher in the BPH group. In the tPSA-range of 0-4 ng/ml none of the biomarkers showed a significant difference in the distribution between both groups. In the tPSA-ranges of 0-10 ng/ml, 2-10 ng/ml, 4-10 ng/ml and <10 ng/ml, f/tPSA showed the highest specificity at high sensitivtities, followed by c/tPSA, cPSA, and tPSA, respectively. In tPSA-ranges greater than 10 ng/ml, cPSA offered the best discriminatory ability. GPSA compared to tPSA offered better specificity at high sensitivities in all tPSA-ranges. CONCLUSION: F/tPSA offers the best ability to distinguish between both groups in lower tPSA-ranges, followed by c/tPSA. CPSA compared to tPSA offers a better ability to discriminate between both groups in all PSA-ranges and could be used as an initial test for PC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3400975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34009752012-07-21 Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? Strittmatter, F Stieber, P Nagel, D Füllhase, C Walther, S Stief, CG Waidelich, R Eur J Med Res Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of total PSA (tPSA), the free/total PSA ratio (f/tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA) and the complexed/total PSA ratio (c/tPSA) in prostate cancer detection. METHODS: Frozen sera of 442 patients have been analysed for tPSA, free PSA (fPSA) and cPSA. 131 patients had prostate cancer and 311 patients benign prostatic hyperplasia. RESULTS: Differences in the distribution of the biomarkers were seen as follows: tPSA, cPSA and c/tPSA were significantly higher in the PC group, and f/tPSA was significantly higher in the BPH group. In the tPSA-range of 0-4 ng/ml none of the biomarkers showed a significant difference in the distribution between both groups. In the tPSA-ranges of 0-10 ng/ml, 2-10 ng/ml, 4-10 ng/ml and <10 ng/ml, f/tPSA showed the highest specificity at high sensitivtities, followed by c/tPSA, cPSA, and tPSA, respectively. In tPSA-ranges greater than 10 ng/ml, cPSA offered the best discriminatory ability. GPSA compared to tPSA offered better specificity at high sensitivities in all tPSA-ranges. CONCLUSION: F/tPSA offers the best ability to distinguish between both groups in lower tPSA-ranges, followed by c/tPSA. CPSA compared to tPSA offers a better ability to discriminate between both groups in all PSA-ranges and could be used as an initial test for PC. BioMed Central 2011-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3400975/ /pubmed/22024423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-16-10-445 Text en Copyright ©2011 I. Holzapfel Publishers |
spellingShingle | Research Strittmatter, F Stieber, P Nagel, D Füllhase, C Walther, S Stief, CG Waidelich, R Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? |
title | Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? |
title_full | Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? |
title_fullStr | Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? |
title_short | Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage? |
title_sort | detection of prostate cancer with complexed psa and complexed/total psa ratio - is there any advantage? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3400975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22024423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-16-10-445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strittmatterf detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage AT stieberp detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage AT nageld detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage AT fullhasec detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage AT walthers detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage AT stiefcg detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage AT waidelichr detectionofprostatecancerwithcomplexedpsaandcomplexedtotalpsaratioisthereanyadvantage |