Cargando…

Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, numerous studies have indicated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer without compromising the oncological outcome. OBJECTIVE: Systematic literature review and meta analysis aimed at evaluating the outcome of laparoscopic and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geetha, Puliyath, Nair, M Krishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837592
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.97584
_version_ 1782238639964553216
author Geetha, Puliyath
Nair, M Krishnan
author_facet Geetha, Puliyath
Nair, M Krishnan
author_sort Geetha, Puliyath
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, numerous studies have indicated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer without compromising the oncological outcome. OBJECTIVE: Systematic literature review and meta analysis aimed at evaluating the outcome of laparoscopic and robotic radical hysterectomy (LRH and RRH) and comparing the results with abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Reference lists were searched for articles published until January 31(st) 2011, using the terms radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robotic radical hysterectomy, surgical treatment of cervical cancer and complications of radical hysterectomy. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies that reported outcome measures of radical hysterectomy by open method, laparoscopic and robotic methods were selected. Data collection and analysis: Two independent reviewers selected studies, abstracted and tabulated the data and pooled estimates were obtained on the surgical and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Mean sample size, age and body mass index across the three types of RH studies were similar. Mean operation time across the three types of RH studies was comparable. Mean blood loss and transfusion rate are significantly higher in ARH compared to both LRH and RRH. Duration of stay in hospital for RRH was significantly less than the other two methods. The mean number of lymph nodes obtained, nodal metastasis and positive margins across the three types of RH studies were similar. Post operative infectious morbidity was significantly higher among patients who underwent ARH compared to the other two methods and a higher rate of cystotomy in LRH. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery especially robotic radical hysterectomy may be a better and safe option for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. The laparoscopic method is not free from complications. However, experience of surgeon may reduce the complications rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3401719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34017192012-07-26 Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review Geetha, Puliyath Nair, M Krishnan J Minim Access Surg Review Article BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, numerous studies have indicated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer without compromising the oncological outcome. OBJECTIVE: Systematic literature review and meta analysis aimed at evaluating the outcome of laparoscopic and robotic radical hysterectomy (LRH and RRH) and comparing the results with abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Reference lists were searched for articles published until January 31(st) 2011, using the terms radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robotic radical hysterectomy, surgical treatment of cervical cancer and complications of radical hysterectomy. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies that reported outcome measures of radical hysterectomy by open method, laparoscopic and robotic methods were selected. Data collection and analysis: Two independent reviewers selected studies, abstracted and tabulated the data and pooled estimates were obtained on the surgical and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Mean sample size, age and body mass index across the three types of RH studies were similar. Mean operation time across the three types of RH studies was comparable. Mean blood loss and transfusion rate are significantly higher in ARH compared to both LRH and RRH. Duration of stay in hospital for RRH was significantly less than the other two methods. The mean number of lymph nodes obtained, nodal metastasis and positive margins across the three types of RH studies were similar. Post operative infectious morbidity was significantly higher among patients who underwent ARH compared to the other two methods and a higher rate of cystotomy in LRH. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery especially robotic radical hysterectomy may be a better and safe option for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. The laparoscopic method is not free from complications. However, experience of surgeon may reduce the complications rate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3401719/ /pubmed/22837592 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.97584 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Geetha, Puliyath
Nair, M Krishnan
Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
title Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
title_full Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
title_fullStr Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
title_short Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review
title_sort laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837592
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.97584
work_keys_str_mv AT geethapuliyath laparoscopicroboticandopenmethodofradicalhysterectomyforcervicalcancerasystematicreview
AT nairmkrishnan laparoscopicroboticandopenmethodofradicalhysterectomyforcervicalcancerasystematicreview