Cargando…
Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
Chronaxie, a historically introduced excitability time parameter for electrical stimulation, has been assumed to be closely related to the time constant of the cell membrane. Therefore, it is perplexing that significantly larger chronaxies have been found for intracellular than for extracellular sti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22516015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004 |
_version_ | 1782238686541250560 |
---|---|
author | Rattay, F. Paredes, L.P. Leao, R.N. |
author_facet | Rattay, F. Paredes, L.P. Leao, R.N. |
author_sort | Rattay, F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronaxie, a historically introduced excitability time parameter for electrical stimulation, has been assumed to be closely related to the time constant of the cell membrane. Therefore, it is perplexing that significantly larger chronaxies have been found for intracellular than for extracellular stimulation. Using compartmental model analysis, this controversy is explained on the basis that extracellular stimulation also generates hyperpolarized regions of the cell membrane hindering a steady excitation as seen in the intracellular case. The largest inside/outside chronaxie ratio for microelectrode stimulation is found in close vicinity of the cell. In the case of monophasic cathodic stimulation, the length of the primarily excited zone which is situated between the hyperpolarized regions increases with electrode–cell distance. For distant electrodes this results in an excitation process comparable to the temporal behavior of intracellular stimulation. Chronaxie also varies along the neural axis, being small for electrode positions at the nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segment and larger at the soma and dendrites. As spike initiation site can change for short and long pulses, in some cases strength–duration curves have a bimodal shape, and thus, they deviate from a classical monotonic curve as described by the formulas of Lapicque or Weiss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3401985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Elsevier Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34019852012-07-24 Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes Rattay, F. Paredes, L.P. Leao, R.N. Neuroscience Article Chronaxie, a historically introduced excitability time parameter for electrical stimulation, has been assumed to be closely related to the time constant of the cell membrane. Therefore, it is perplexing that significantly larger chronaxies have been found for intracellular than for extracellular stimulation. Using compartmental model analysis, this controversy is explained on the basis that extracellular stimulation also generates hyperpolarized regions of the cell membrane hindering a steady excitation as seen in the intracellular case. The largest inside/outside chronaxie ratio for microelectrode stimulation is found in close vicinity of the cell. In the case of monophasic cathodic stimulation, the length of the primarily excited zone which is situated between the hyperpolarized regions increases with electrode–cell distance. For distant electrodes this results in an excitation process comparable to the temporal behavior of intracellular stimulation. Chronaxie also varies along the neural axis, being small for electrode positions at the nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segment and larger at the soma and dendrites. As spike initiation site can change for short and long pulses, in some cases strength–duration curves have a bimodal shape, and thus, they deviate from a classical monotonic curve as described by the formulas of Lapicque or Weiss. Elsevier Science 2012-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3401985/ /pubmed/22516015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Rattay, F. Paredes, L.P. Leao, R.N. Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
title | Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
title_full | Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
title_fullStr | Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
title_full_unstemmed | Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
title_short | Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
title_sort | strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22516015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rattayf strengthdurationrelationshipforintraversusextracellularstimulationwithmicroelectrodes AT paredeslp strengthdurationrelationshipforintraversusextracellularstimulationwithmicroelectrodes AT leaorn strengthdurationrelationshipforintraversusextracellularstimulationwithmicroelectrodes |