Cargando…

Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes

Chronaxie, a historically introduced excitability time parameter for electrical stimulation, has been assumed to be closely related to the time constant of the cell membrane. Therefore, it is perplexing that significantly larger chronaxies have been found for intracellular than for extracellular sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rattay, F., Paredes, L.P., Leao, R.N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22516015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004
_version_ 1782238686541250560
author Rattay, F.
Paredes, L.P.
Leao, R.N.
author_facet Rattay, F.
Paredes, L.P.
Leao, R.N.
author_sort Rattay, F.
collection PubMed
description Chronaxie, a historically introduced excitability time parameter for electrical stimulation, has been assumed to be closely related to the time constant of the cell membrane. Therefore, it is perplexing that significantly larger chronaxies have been found for intracellular than for extracellular stimulation. Using compartmental model analysis, this controversy is explained on the basis that extracellular stimulation also generates hyperpolarized regions of the cell membrane hindering a steady excitation as seen in the intracellular case. The largest inside/outside chronaxie ratio for microelectrode stimulation is found in close vicinity of the cell. In the case of monophasic cathodic stimulation, the length of the primarily excited zone which is situated between the hyperpolarized regions increases with electrode–cell distance. For distant electrodes this results in an excitation process comparable to the temporal behavior of intracellular stimulation. Chronaxie also varies along the neural axis, being small for electrode positions at the nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segment and larger at the soma and dendrites. As spike initiation site can change for short and long pulses, in some cases strength–duration curves have a bimodal shape, and thus, they deviate from a classical monotonic curve as described by the formulas of Lapicque or Weiss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3401985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34019852012-07-24 Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes Rattay, F. Paredes, L.P. Leao, R.N. Neuroscience Article Chronaxie, a historically introduced excitability time parameter for electrical stimulation, has been assumed to be closely related to the time constant of the cell membrane. Therefore, it is perplexing that significantly larger chronaxies have been found for intracellular than for extracellular stimulation. Using compartmental model analysis, this controversy is explained on the basis that extracellular stimulation also generates hyperpolarized regions of the cell membrane hindering a steady excitation as seen in the intracellular case. The largest inside/outside chronaxie ratio for microelectrode stimulation is found in close vicinity of the cell. In the case of monophasic cathodic stimulation, the length of the primarily excited zone which is situated between the hyperpolarized regions increases with electrode–cell distance. For distant electrodes this results in an excitation process comparable to the temporal behavior of intracellular stimulation. Chronaxie also varies along the neural axis, being small for electrode positions at the nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segment and larger at the soma and dendrites. As spike initiation site can change for short and long pulses, in some cases strength–duration curves have a bimodal shape, and thus, they deviate from a classical monotonic curve as described by the formulas of Lapicque or Weiss. Elsevier Science 2012-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3401985/ /pubmed/22516015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Rattay, F.
Paredes, L.P.
Leao, R.N.
Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
title Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
title_full Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
title_fullStr Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
title_full_unstemmed Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
title_short Strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
title_sort strength–duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3401985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22516015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT rattayf strengthdurationrelationshipforintraversusextracellularstimulationwithmicroelectrodes
AT paredeslp strengthdurationrelationshipforintraversusextracellularstimulationwithmicroelectrodes
AT leaorn strengthdurationrelationshipforintraversusextracellularstimulationwithmicroelectrodes