Cargando…

Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of one course of rituximab (two 1-g doses) compared to an alternative tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) blocker in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had experienced one previous TNFα blocker failure (eg, etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kekow, Joern, Mueller-Ladner, Ulf, Schulze-Koops, Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848150
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S32244
_version_ 1782238694599557120
author Kekow, Joern
Mueller-Ladner, Ulf
Schulze-Koops, Hendrik
author_facet Kekow, Joern
Mueller-Ladner, Ulf
Schulze-Koops, Hendrik
author_sort Kekow, Joern
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of one course of rituximab (two 1-g doses) compared to an alternative tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) blocker in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had experienced one previous TNFα blocker failure (eg, etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy of both treatments was studied in this retrospective, multicenter, noninterventional cohort study with 196 patients. All patients had active rheumatoid arthritis defined by a Disease Activity Score-28 of ≥3.2 despite having TNFα blocker therapy, and were followed over 6.6 months on average after switching to rituximab versus a second TNFα blocker (ie, switching to etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab) at baseline. RESULTS: At baseline, both cohorts showed similar demographic and disease-related characteristics (including Disease Activity Score-28). At the end of observation, mean Disease Activity Score-28 was significantly lower after treatment with rituximab than with a second TNFα blocker (−1.64 [95% confidence interval: −1.92; −1.36] versus −1.19 [95% confidence interval: −1.42; −0.96], P = 0.013). This difference between the two groups was even more pronounced when patients were seropositive for rheumatoid factor (−1.66 versus −1.17, P = 0.018) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (−1.75 versus −1.06, P = 0.002). More rituximab-treated patients achieved good European League Against Rheumatism response than TNFα blocker-treated patients (30% versus 15%), and less patients were nonresponders (22% versus 35%) according to European League Against Rheumatism criteria (P = 0.022, chi-squared test). CONCLUSION: Treatment with rituximab was more effective than a second TNFα blocker therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients after failure of the first TNFα blocker. It was found that anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies may be a useful predictive biomarker for response to rituximab in patients with TNFα blocker treatment failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3402045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34020452012-07-30 Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure Kekow, Joern Mueller-Ladner, Ulf Schulze-Koops, Hendrik Biologics Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of one course of rituximab (two 1-g doses) compared to an alternative tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) blocker in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had experienced one previous TNFα blocker failure (eg, etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy of both treatments was studied in this retrospective, multicenter, noninterventional cohort study with 196 patients. All patients had active rheumatoid arthritis defined by a Disease Activity Score-28 of ≥3.2 despite having TNFα blocker therapy, and were followed over 6.6 months on average after switching to rituximab versus a second TNFα blocker (ie, switching to etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab) at baseline. RESULTS: At baseline, both cohorts showed similar demographic and disease-related characteristics (including Disease Activity Score-28). At the end of observation, mean Disease Activity Score-28 was significantly lower after treatment with rituximab than with a second TNFα blocker (−1.64 [95% confidence interval: −1.92; −1.36] versus −1.19 [95% confidence interval: −1.42; −0.96], P = 0.013). This difference between the two groups was even more pronounced when patients were seropositive for rheumatoid factor (−1.66 versus −1.17, P = 0.018) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (−1.75 versus −1.06, P = 0.002). More rituximab-treated patients achieved good European League Against Rheumatism response than TNFα blocker-treated patients (30% versus 15%), and less patients were nonresponders (22% versus 35%) according to European League Against Rheumatism criteria (P = 0.022, chi-squared test). CONCLUSION: Treatment with rituximab was more effective than a second TNFα blocker therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients after failure of the first TNFα blocker. It was found that anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies may be a useful predictive biomarker for response to rituximab in patients with TNFα blocker treatment failure. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3402045/ /pubmed/22848150 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S32244 Text en © 2012 Kekow et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kekow, Joern
Mueller-Ladner, Ulf
Schulze-Koops, Hendrik
Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure
title Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure
title_full Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure
title_fullStr Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure
title_full_unstemmed Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure
title_short Rituximab is more effective than second anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous TNFα blocker failure
title_sort rituximab is more effective than second anti-tnf therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients and previous tnfα blocker failure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848150
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S32244
work_keys_str_mv AT kekowjoern rituximabismoreeffectivethansecondantitnftherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientsandprevioustnfablockerfailure
AT muellerladnerulf rituximabismoreeffectivethansecondantitnftherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientsandprevioustnfablockerfailure
AT schulzekoopshendrik rituximabismoreeffectivethansecondantitnftherapyinrheumatoidarthritispatientsandprevioustnfablockerfailure