Cargando…

Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two fixed combinations, ie, timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% (TBD) versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% (TB) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: We performed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baiza-Durán, Leopoldo Martín, Llamas-Moreno, Juan Francisco, Ayala-Barajas, Clotilde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848147
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S33578
_version_ 1782238703328952320
author Baiza-Durán, Leopoldo Martín
Llamas-Moreno, Juan Francisco
Ayala-Barajas, Clotilde
author_facet Baiza-Durán, Leopoldo Martín
Llamas-Moreno, Juan Francisco
Ayala-Barajas, Clotilde
author_sort Baiza-Durán, Leopoldo Martín
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two fixed combinations, ie, timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% (TBD) versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% (TB) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: We performed a 3-month, randomized, double-blind study in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and an intraocular pressure of 21–30 mmHg. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one drop of TBD or TB twice a day. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in intraocular pressure after 3 months of treatment. Safety measures were assessed by the presence of adverse events. RESULTS: Mean baseline intraocular pressure was similar at 8 am and 4 pm in the treatment groups (TBD 22.3 ± 0.9 mmHg, TB 22.4 ± 1.8 mmHg, P = 0.558; TBD 19.02 ± 1.3, TB 19.08 ± 1.2, P = 0.536, respectively). At the end of the study, the mean intraocular pressure was significantly lower in the TBD group at both 8 am (16.19 ± 2.0 mmHg versus 18.35 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.000) and 4 pm (14.74 ± 2.4 mmHg versus 16.77 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Fixed-combination TBD was more effective than fixed-combination TB for reducing IOP in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3402120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34021202012-07-30 Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension Baiza-Durán, Leopoldo Martín Llamas-Moreno, Juan Francisco Ayala-Barajas, Clotilde Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two fixed combinations, ie, timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% (TBD) versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% (TB) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: We performed a 3-month, randomized, double-blind study in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and an intraocular pressure of 21–30 mmHg. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one drop of TBD or TB twice a day. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in intraocular pressure after 3 months of treatment. Safety measures were assessed by the presence of adverse events. RESULTS: Mean baseline intraocular pressure was similar at 8 am and 4 pm in the treatment groups (TBD 22.3 ± 0.9 mmHg, TB 22.4 ± 1.8 mmHg, P = 0.558; TBD 19.02 ± 1.3, TB 19.08 ± 1.2, P = 0.536, respectively). At the end of the study, the mean intraocular pressure was significantly lower in the TBD group at both 8 am (16.19 ± 2.0 mmHg versus 18.35 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.000) and 4 pm (14.74 ± 2.4 mmHg versus 16.77 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Fixed-combination TBD was more effective than fixed-combination TB for reducing IOP in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3402120/ /pubmed/22848147 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S33578 Text en © 2012 Baiza-Durán et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Baiza-Durán, Leopoldo Martín
Llamas-Moreno, Juan Francisco
Ayala-Barajas, Clotilde
Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_full Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_fullStr Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_short Comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a Mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
title_sort comparison of timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% + dorzolamide 2% versus timolol 0.5% + brimonidine 0.2% in a mexican population with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848147
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S33578
work_keys_str_mv AT baizaduranleopoldomartin comparisonoftimolol05brimonidine02dorzolamide2versustimolol05brimonidine02inamexicanpopulationwithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT llamasmorenojuanfrancisco comparisonoftimolol05brimonidine02dorzolamide2versustimolol05brimonidine02inamexicanpopulationwithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension
AT ayalabarajasclotilde comparisonoftimolol05brimonidine02dorzolamide2versustimolol05brimonidine02inamexicanpopulationwithprimaryopenangleglaucomaorocularhypertension