Cargando…

Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 61 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy using single sutures (n = 33, 54.1%) or releasable sutures (n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matlach, Juliane, Hoffmann, Niels, Freiberg, Florentina J, Grehn, Franz, Klink, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848142
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S32503
_version_ 1782238704212901888
author Matlach, Juliane
Hoffmann, Niels
Freiberg, Florentina J
Grehn, Franz
Klink, Thomas
author_facet Matlach, Juliane
Hoffmann, Niels
Freiberg, Florentina J
Grehn, Franz
Klink, Thomas
author_sort Matlach, Juliane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 61 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy using single sutures (n = 33, 54.1%) or releasable sutures (n = 28, 45.9%). The scleral flap was secured with a mean 3.9 (range 3–5) single sutures in 33 patients and with three releasable sutures in 28 patients. Primary outcomes were the success rate, based on intraocular pressure and medication usage, and the frequency of complications and post-surgical interventions. The criteria used to determine complete success were, first, intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg and, second, ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% intraocular pressure reduction without glaucoma medication. RESULTS: All patients had an intraocular pressure ≤ 21 mmHg; 87.5% in the single suture group and 92.6% in the releasable suture group had an intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg at 24 months. There was a highly significant reduction in intraocular pressure to baseline values in both groups at the last visit. Applying the first criterion, complete success was achieved in 57.6% of patients with single sutures and 71.4% with releasable sutures, and based on the second criterion, 66.7% and 71.4%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the groups with regard to intraocular pressure, or success or complication rates. CONCLUSION: The results of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures are equivalent. Therefore, the choice of suture technique should be based on individual patient requirements and surgeon experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3402124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34021242012-07-30 Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures Matlach, Juliane Hoffmann, Niels Freiberg, Florentina J Grehn, Franz Klink, Thomas Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 61 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy using single sutures (n = 33, 54.1%) or releasable sutures (n = 28, 45.9%). The scleral flap was secured with a mean 3.9 (range 3–5) single sutures in 33 patients and with three releasable sutures in 28 patients. Primary outcomes were the success rate, based on intraocular pressure and medication usage, and the frequency of complications and post-surgical interventions. The criteria used to determine complete success were, first, intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg and, second, ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% intraocular pressure reduction without glaucoma medication. RESULTS: All patients had an intraocular pressure ≤ 21 mmHg; 87.5% in the single suture group and 92.6% in the releasable suture group had an intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg at 24 months. There was a highly significant reduction in intraocular pressure to baseline values in both groups at the last visit. Applying the first criterion, complete success was achieved in 57.6% of patients with single sutures and 71.4% with releasable sutures, and based on the second criterion, 66.7% and 71.4%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the groups with regard to intraocular pressure, or success or complication rates. CONCLUSION: The results of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures are equivalent. Therefore, the choice of suture technique should be based on individual patient requirements and surgeon experience. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3402124/ /pubmed/22848142 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S32503 Text en © 2012 Matlach et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Matlach, Juliane
Hoffmann, Niels
Freiberg, Florentina J
Grehn, Franz
Klink, Thomas
Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
title Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
title_full Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
title_fullStr Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
title_short Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
title_sort comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22848142
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S32503
work_keys_str_mv AT matlachjuliane comparativestudyoftrabeculectomyusingsinglesuturesversusreleasablesutures
AT hoffmannniels comparativestudyoftrabeculectomyusingsinglesuturesversusreleasablesutures
AT freibergflorentinaj comparativestudyoftrabeculectomyusingsinglesuturesversusreleasablesutures
AT grehnfranz comparativestudyoftrabeculectomyusingsinglesuturesversusreleasablesutures
AT klinkthomas comparativestudyoftrabeculectomyusingsinglesuturesversusreleasablesutures