Cargando…

An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative

BACKGROUND: The Wales National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) is a 16-week programme including motivational interviewing, goal setting and relapse prevention. METHOD: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with nested economic evaluation of 2160 inactive participants with coronary heart disease ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Simon Mark, Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Williams, Nefyn, Raisanen, Larry, Moore, Graham, Linck, Pat, Hounsome, Natalia, Din, Nafees Ud, Moore, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200689
_version_ 1782238782091689984
author Murphy, Simon Mark
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Williams, Nefyn
Raisanen, Larry
Moore, Graham
Linck, Pat
Hounsome, Natalia
Din, Nafees Ud
Moore, Laurence
author_facet Murphy, Simon Mark
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Williams, Nefyn
Raisanen, Larry
Moore, Graham
Linck, Pat
Hounsome, Natalia
Din, Nafees Ud
Moore, Laurence
author_sort Murphy, Simon Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Wales National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) is a 16-week programme including motivational interviewing, goal setting and relapse prevention. METHOD: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with nested economic evaluation of 2160 inactive participants with coronary heart disease risk (CHD, 1559, 72%), mild to moderate depression, anxiety or stress (79, 4%) or both (522, 24%) randomised to receive (1) NERS or (2) normal care and brief written information. Outcome measures at 12 months included the 7-day physical activity recall, the hospital anxiety and depression scale. RESULTS: Ordinal regression identified increased physical activity among those randomised to NERS compared with those receiving normal care in all participants (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.43), and among those referred for CHD only (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.60). For those referred for mental health reason alone, or in combination with CHD, there were significantly lower levels of anxiety (OR −1.56, 95% CI −2.75 to −0.38) and depression (OR −1.39, 95% CI −2.60 to −0.18), but no effect on physical activity. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £12 111 per quality adjusted life year, falling to £9741 if participants were to contribute £2 per session. CONCLUSIONS: NERS was effective in increasing physical activity among those referred for CHD risk only. Among mental health referrals, NERS did not influence physical activity but was associated with reduced anxiety and depression. Effects were dependent on adherence. NERS is likely to be cost effective with respect to prevailing payer thresholds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47680448.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3402741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34027412012-07-25 An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative Murphy, Simon Mark Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor Williams, Nefyn Raisanen, Larry Moore, Graham Linck, Pat Hounsome, Natalia Din, Nafees Ud Moore, Laurence J Epidemiol Community Health Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice BACKGROUND: The Wales National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) is a 16-week programme including motivational interviewing, goal setting and relapse prevention. METHOD: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with nested economic evaluation of 2160 inactive participants with coronary heart disease risk (CHD, 1559, 72%), mild to moderate depression, anxiety or stress (79, 4%) or both (522, 24%) randomised to receive (1) NERS or (2) normal care and brief written information. Outcome measures at 12 months included the 7-day physical activity recall, the hospital anxiety and depression scale. RESULTS: Ordinal regression identified increased physical activity among those randomised to NERS compared with those receiving normal care in all participants (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.43), and among those referred for CHD only (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.60). For those referred for mental health reason alone, or in combination with CHD, there were significantly lower levels of anxiety (OR −1.56, 95% CI −2.75 to −0.38) and depression (OR −1.39, 95% CI −2.60 to −0.18), but no effect on physical activity. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £12 111 per quality adjusted life year, falling to £9741 if participants were to contribute £2 per session. CONCLUSIONS: NERS was effective in increasing physical activity among those referred for CHD risk only. Among mental health referrals, NERS did not influence physical activity but was associated with reduced anxiety and depression. Effects were dependent on adherence. NERS is likely to be cost effective with respect to prevailing payer thresholds. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47680448. BMJ Group 2012-05-10 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3402741/ /pubmed/22577180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200689 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice
Murphy, Simon Mark
Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor
Williams, Nefyn
Raisanen, Larry
Moore, Graham
Linck, Pat
Hounsome, Natalia
Din, Nafees Ud
Moore, Laurence
An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
title An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
title_full An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
title_fullStr An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
title_short An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the national exercise referral scheme in wales, uk: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative
topic Evidence-Based Public Health Policy and Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200689
work_keys_str_mv AT murphysimonmark anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT edwardsrhiannontudor anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT williamsnefyn anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT raisanenlarry anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT mooregraham anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT linckpat anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT hounsomenatalia anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT dinnafeesud anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT moorelaurence anevaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT murphysimonmark evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT edwardsrhiannontudor evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT williamsnefyn evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT raisanenlarry evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT mooregraham evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT linckpat evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT hounsomenatalia evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT dinnafeesud evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative
AT moorelaurence evaluationoftheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofthenationalexercisereferralschemeinwalesukarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapublichealthpolicyinitiative