Cargando…
Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study
RATIONALE: Criteria for a clinically significant bronchodilator response (BDR) are mainly based on studies in patients with obstructive lung diseases. Little is known about the BDR in healthy general populations, and even less about the worldwide patterns. METHODS: 10 360 adults aged 40 years and ol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445 |
_version_ | 1782238783704399872 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Wan C Vollmer, William M Lamprecht, Bernd Mannino, David M Jithoo, Anamika Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Ewa Mejza, Filip Gislason, Thorarinn Burney, Peter G J Buist, A Sonia |
author_facet | Tan, Wan C Vollmer, William M Lamprecht, Bernd Mannino, David M Jithoo, Anamika Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Ewa Mejza, Filip Gislason, Thorarinn Burney, Peter G J Buist, A Sonia |
author_sort | Tan, Wan C |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: Criteria for a clinically significant bronchodilator response (BDR) are mainly based on studies in patients with obstructive lung diseases. Little is known about the BDR in healthy general populations, and even less about the worldwide patterns. METHODS: 10 360 adults aged 40 years and older from 14 countries in North America, Europe, Africa and Asia participated in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Spirometry was used before and after an inhaled bronchodilator to determine the distribution of the BDR in population-based samples of healthy non-smokers and individuals with airflow obstruction. RESULTS: In 3922 healthy never smokers, the weighted pooled estimate of the 95th percentiles (95% CI) for bronchodilator response were 284 ml (263 to 305) absolute change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline (ΔFEV(1)); 12.0% (11.2% to 12.8%) change relative to initial value (%ΔFEV(1i)); and 10.0% (9.5% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (%ΔFEV(1p)). The corresponding mean changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) were 322 ml (271 to 373) absolute change from baseline (ΔFVC); 10.5% (8.9% to 12.0%) change relative to initial value (ΔFVC(i)); and 9.2% (7.9% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (ΔFVC(p)). The proportion who exceeded the above threshold values in the subgroup with spirometrically defined Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 2 and higher (FEV(1)/FVC <0.7 and FEV(1)% predicted <80%) were 11.1%, 30.8% and 12.9% respectively for the FEV(1)-based thresholds and 22.6%, 28.6% and 22.1% respectively for the FVC-based thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide reference values for bronchodilator responses worldwide that confirm guideline estimates for a clinically significant level of BDR in bronchodilator testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3402754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34027542012-07-25 Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study Tan, Wan C Vollmer, William M Lamprecht, Bernd Mannino, David M Jithoo, Anamika Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Ewa Mejza, Filip Gislason, Thorarinn Burney, Peter G J Buist, A Sonia Thorax Respiratory Epidemiology RATIONALE: Criteria for a clinically significant bronchodilator response (BDR) are mainly based on studies in patients with obstructive lung diseases. Little is known about the BDR in healthy general populations, and even less about the worldwide patterns. METHODS: 10 360 adults aged 40 years and older from 14 countries in North America, Europe, Africa and Asia participated in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Spirometry was used before and after an inhaled bronchodilator to determine the distribution of the BDR in population-based samples of healthy non-smokers and individuals with airflow obstruction. RESULTS: In 3922 healthy never smokers, the weighted pooled estimate of the 95th percentiles (95% CI) for bronchodilator response were 284 ml (263 to 305) absolute change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline (ΔFEV(1)); 12.0% (11.2% to 12.8%) change relative to initial value (%ΔFEV(1i)); and 10.0% (9.5% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (%ΔFEV(1p)). The corresponding mean changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) were 322 ml (271 to 373) absolute change from baseline (ΔFVC); 10.5% (8.9% to 12.0%) change relative to initial value (ΔFVC(i)); and 9.2% (7.9% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (ΔFVC(p)). The proportion who exceeded the above threshold values in the subgroup with spirometrically defined Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 2 and higher (FEV(1)/FVC <0.7 and FEV(1)% predicted <80%) were 11.1%, 30.8% and 12.9% respectively for the FEV(1)-based thresholds and 22.6%, 28.6% and 22.1% respectively for the FVC-based thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide reference values for bronchodilator responses worldwide that confirm guideline estimates for a clinically significant level of BDR in bronchodilator testing. BMJ Group 2012-04-29 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3402754/ /pubmed/22544896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Epidemiology Tan, Wan C Vollmer, William M Lamprecht, Bernd Mannino, David M Jithoo, Anamika Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Ewa Mejza, Filip Gislason, Thorarinn Burney, Peter G J Buist, A Sonia Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study |
title | Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study |
title_full | Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study |
title_fullStr | Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study |
title_full_unstemmed | Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study |
title_short | Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study |
title_sort | worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the burden of obstructive lung disease study |
topic | Respiratory Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22544896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanwanc worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT vollmerwilliamm worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT lamprechtbernd worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT manninodavidm worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT jithooanamika worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT nizankowskamogilnickaewa worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT mejzafilip worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT gislasonthorarinn worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT burneypetergj worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT buistasonia worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy AT worldwidepatternsofbronchodilatorresponsivenessresultsfromtheburdenofobstructivelungdiseasestudy |